Gastrointestinal Cancers Lecture Flashcards
LO:
- Organs of the gastrointestinal tract: Summarise the structure of gastrointestinal organs and relate these to their functions
- Gastrooesophageal disorders: Summarise the pathology and pathophysiology of gastrooesophageal disorders
- Gastrooesophageal disorders: Describe the clinical features and treatment options of gastrooesophageal disorders
- Hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders: Summarise the pathology and pathophysiology of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders
- Hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders: Describe the clinical features and treatment options of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders
- Intestinal disorders: Summarise the pathology and pathophysiology of small and large intestine disorders.
- Intestinal disorders: Describe the clinical features and treatment options of small and large intestine disorders
Session Plan:

Terms: -Cancer -Primary -Secondary
Cancer
“A term for diseases in which abnormal cells divide without control and can invade nearby tissues. Cancer cells can also spread to other parts of the body through the blood and lymph systems”
Primary
•Arising directly from the cells in an organ
Secondary/Metastasis
•Spread from another organ, directly or by other means (blood or lymph)

What is Cancer? The Hallmarks of Cancer
Six biological capabilities acquired by tumours are:
Hanahan and Weinberg published a paper, it was called The Hallmarks of Cancer. And in that, they described six biological capabilities that are required by cancers during the multi-step development of human tumours.
So if we look at this diagram here, we start at the top. These are the six by the first six biological capabilities that are required by humans. They are first sustaining proliferative signalling. Second, evading growth suppressors. They can also activate invasion and metastasis. They can enable replicative immortality in the microenvironment around them. They can induce angiogenesis. And that’s essentially to get the blood supply to support the tumour that’s growing. And they have resistance to cell death. So they were the first Hallmark’s for six described.
Basically take home message of this, is there is too much go, and not enough stop. So everything is driving things to replicate, get bigger and grow.

The following underlie these hallmarks:
They publisehd a second paper, 2011, where they described another two emerging hallmarks of cancer, and they described these as deregulating cellular energetics and avoiding immune destruction by the host body that is trying to destroy the cancers.
They also identified a couple of enabling characteristics, which they described as genome instability and mutation, and tumour promoting inflammation.
So basically what’s happening here is that cancers are gaining a selective advantage that give them an edge over their neighbours. So these can be acquired through genetic change, but also through epigenetic dysregulation. So, for example, chronic inflammation can affect gene expression patterns in the absence of actual sequence changes themselves. So we’re looking at GI cancers. What we’re describing is normal tissue in GI tract that inquires these features in a stepwise manner. So you go from a normal mucosa to primitive lesions, which eventually become an invasive cancer. Happens in a stepwise manner. And you’ll see this throughout the cancers that we discuss.

A Few Instant Truths
- Cancer is a genetic disease
- Cancers contain multiple genetic errors which occur in a stepwise fashion
- Cancers contain more than just malignant cells (They have a structure. You will have stromal cells. You will have neovascular vessels, etc.)
- Killing cancer cells is easy (ie in chemotherapy)
- ONLY killing cancer cells and not affectig other cells around them is very hard
- Developing novel therapies for cancer fraught with problems

Types of Cancer
Last year, we looked at cells of the GI tract. We talked briefly about a squamous cell cancer going on in the oesophagus. And most of our focus was on adenocarcinomas within the GI tract. We’ll be focussing on another adenocarcinoma a bit later. But we’ll also be looking at some specialised cells- neuroendocrine cells, which cause neuroendocrine tumours.
We’ve got connective tissue, smooth muscle causes, Leiomyosarcomas, adipose tissue causes, liposarcomas, etc.
Note: Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) are mesenchymal cells located within the muscle layers of the alimentary tract, they act as the pacemaker of the GI Smooth Muscle.

GI Cancers
You can get neuroendocrine tumours throughout the GI tract, from the oesophagus to the stomach to the duodenum them to the pancreas, to the large bowel, small bowel and rectum.

New Cases of Cancer – UK, 2017

In the UK in 2017, the new cases of cancer recorded 367,167. And this is essentially the instance. You see the commonest is breast cancer, followed by prostate cancer, followed by lung cancer.
The one cancer we’re going to be talking about in gastroenterology is bowel cancer. That’s the fourth commonest. But then if we go down incident wise. It takes us a while before we get to oesophagus and pancreas, then stomach and liver. So the incidence of those cancers are low.
Cancer Deaths – UK, 2018

Deaths from cancers in the UK in 2018 reached 165, 000 or so. But what’s causing the death? Well, lung cancer, yes, but bowel cancer is up there. And now we’re seeing pancreas which instances low and oesophagus and liver, they’re all at that age. They are nasty cancers and the cause early death.
Death Rates by Cancer Type
And this is just to reiterate those two slides. This is looking at death rates by cancer type. Essentially, we’re looking at the incidence versus death ratio. So when we look at that liver, pancreas, oesophagus, stomach, gall bladder, these are all gastrointestinal tumours, for incidence, is low, but the death rate is high. So there are serious problems that need answers to.

Screening – Catching the Disease Early
How many people survive 5 years from diagnosis? CRUK data
So how does one go about? Managing patients cancer?
Well, I think it’s worth mentioning screening for cancers. This is a slide which shows how many people survive five years from their diagnosis. So, for instance, if you go to colorectal cancer, the overall five year survival rate is pretty high. It’s 60 percent over five years. The percentage of patients that are diagnosed at the stage where they can have their cancer resected is actually high, just less than 50 percent. Is it 45 percent. And that is reflected in the five year survival of those that have resectable diagnoses, so 90 percent are alive at five years. And probably the answer to that is, if you think about the the anatomy is that large bowel is relatively mobile, it has a mesentery and it usually keeps to itself. Other cancers, such as pancreatic, oesophageal and cholangiocarcinoma certainly, involve structures very quickly.
Pancreas overall survival rate is appalling at five percent. But also the percentage of patients that can have their disease resected at the time of diagnosis is only I would say ten to fifteen, but here we have 15 to 20 percent. And that’s reflected in the five year survival for those that have their disease resected, only being around 20 percent. And it’s similar with oesophageal, liver-hepatocellular cancer, gall bladder cancer, and cholangiocarcinomas.
The big problem is finding these cancers early. All these cancers are presenting late before you can do anything about it. So essentially, the earlier you identify cancer, the better the chance you have to dissecting it. And that is subsequently reflected in a better five year survival.

Screening for Cancer
Cancer screening
- Testing of asymptomatic individuals to identify cancer at an early stage.
- What diseases are suitable for screening? Wilson & Jungner criteria.
- Depends on the epidemiology of a disease & features of the test.
So let’s talk about cancer screening. Essentially, that’s testing an asymptomatic individual to try and identify cancer at an early stage before the patient even knows about it.
What diseases are suitable for screening? This brings us to the Wilson and Jungner criteria. Now, this is a paper out from about the 1960s. It was entitled Principles and Practise of Screening for Disease. It’s become a public health classic. And what that’s doing is looking for the criteria of screening for cancers early. So they came up with seven criteria.
First, the condition sort of what you’re looking for should be an important health problem. So lots of people should be dying from it. It needs to be addressed.
Second, if you identify that cancer early, there has to be an accepted treatment for those patients for that recognised disease. So there’s no point finding cancer early. You can’t do anything about it.
You have to have the facilities or the infrastructure for the diagnosis and the treatment. So that should be available.
There should be recognisable latent or early symptomatic stage. I mentioned asymptomatic before, but that was the phraseology they used back in 1968?
You need to have a suitable test or an examination that can identify it easily.
The test should be acceptable to the population, so, for instance, if you’re screening for colorectal cancer, a colonoscopy has to be acceptable to patients. It can’t be a thoroughly unpleasant thing where no one will turn up to have their test done.
And seven, the natural history of the condition, including the development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood. So that’s important. Adequately, but not necessarily completely.
So that’s the sort of criteria you need if you’re looking to set up a screening programme. It also depends on the epidemiology of the disease. So you’ll find that rare cancers such as pancreatic cancer. There isn’t any economic sense in screening because you’ll pick up rate is going to be so low that you’re not actually going to be saving that many lives. So you need something that’s the incidence is high and there’s something you can do about it.

Screening in GI Cancer
(note: Besides these, specific screening programmes exist for individuals with genetic predisposition or strong family histories.)
Colorectal cancer
Offered to healthy individuals:
- Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) - detects haemoglobin in faeces, every 2 years for everyone aged 60-74
- One-off sigmoidoscopy for everyone aged >55 to remove polyps (reducing future risk of cancer).

Screening in GI Cancer
Oesophageal cancer
Regular endoscopy only offered to patients with:
- Barrett’s oesophagus
- or Low- or high-grade dysplasia.

Screening in GI Cancer
Pancreatic & Gastric cancer
- No test exists that meets the W & J criteria.
- Depends on incidence - Japan screens for gastric cancer (as incidence of gastric cancer in Japan is very high, so they offer screening programmes which consist of endoscopies, because the pickup rate there is a lot higher due to ther higher incidence, so it makes economical and clinical sense.)

Screening in GI Cancer
Hepatocellular cancer ie primary cancer of the liver
- Regular ultrasound & AFP for high-risk individuals with cirrhosis
- Viral hepatitis
- Alcoholic hepatitis.
ie patients who have been identified as having cirrhotic livers either secondary to viral hepatitis or alcoholic hepatitis or even now we are looking at patients with NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis). They are offered regular ultrasound scans and AFPs (blood test for alpha fetoprotein)

Besides these, specific screening programmes exist for individuals with genetic predisposition or strong family histories. Explain
Eg patients with FAP (familial adenomatous polyposis), they have increased risk of having multiple polyps in their colon, some have multiple polyps in their duodenum, and they are at high risk of developing colorectal cancer or duodenal cancer. So in a lot of cases, if they’ve got thousands of polyps, they are offered prophylactic resections before something becomes a cancer. Offered yearly colonoscopies if they haven’t had their bowel removed or if they have they are offered sigmoidoscopies to look at what’s left of the rectal stump, that’s to look for rectal polyps, and they have yearly OGDs (Oesophago-Gastric-Duodeno-Scopies), for duodenal polyps.
There are patients that have hereditary pancreatitis from genetic mutations (think PanCreaS) of PRSS1 (press 1), SPINK1 and cystic fibrosis gene CFTR. Those patients have a 40 percent lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer and some of them were offered prophylactic resections when you see changes. But if not, they essentially have a yearly imaging of the pancreas, plus or minus endoscopic ultrasound scans trying to pick up cancers early if they haven’t had prophylactic surgery.
The Patient’s Cancer Journey:
DST (D.STephen)
Best treatment is to actually take it away so there’s nothing there to cause problems. That’s often not possible, as we saw in an earlier slide. Treatment options would then consist of systemic chemotherapy or local radiotherapy.

The Cancer Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)-what is the path from pickup?
Anyone has anything worrying about a cancer can get referred to what’s called a two week wait cancer pathway. So essentially within two weeks of say a GP saying this patient may have a cancer, that patient has to have had at least diagnostic tests and at least been discussed in an MDT (multi disciplinary team) meeting. And then offer treatment as as required

The Cancer Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)
So what does an MDT consist of?
Surgeon-operating
Oncologist-chemotherapy
etc.

Pathologist:
- Confirms the diagnosis of cancer using biopsy samples
- Provides histologic typing, i.e. what type of cell does the cancer come from?
- Provides Molecular typing, i.e. what Mutations does this cancer have?
- Provides the tumour grade, i.e. how aggressive is the cancer?
Very important to know exactly what cancer you’re dealing with because different cancers can be treated better or worse with surgery or better or worse with chemotherapy. And your chemotherapy choice depends exactly on what that tumour is.

Radiologist
- Reviews scans
- Provides radiological tumour stage, i.e. how far has the cancer spread?
- Provides re-staging after treatment.
- Interventional Radiology
T2 is relatively small. N0 is no lymph nodes involved and M0 again is no evidence of metastastes.
But a patient with the T3 tumour, it would be bigger in size. N1 being it looks like it’s got lymph nodes involved. Remember, it’s never a hundred percent sure till you actually get histological confirmation, you’re just looking at radiological images and N1 has got metastases, so that patient is probably not going to be curable. But again, it depends on on the cancer.
And there are also specialised radiologists who are interventional radiologists. And they will be taking percutaneous biopsies of, let’s say, liver or retroperitoneal pancreas that can’t be reached by endoscopic means and they’ll be putting in radiological stents. So if someone presents with obstructive jaundice secondary to a cholangiocarcinoma in the liver, you can’t get their endoscopicly. It has to be done percutaneously via, remember from last year, PTC per cutaneous tranhepatic cholangiography.

Surgeon & Gastroenterologist (tend to work in tandem)
They can take oesophageal and gastric biopsies to get the diagnosis. They can put in oesophageal endoscopic stents to combat dysphagia.
We have the ERCP to relieve biliary obstruction and endoscopic ultrasound biopsies if required.

Oncologist
Coordinate the whole thing.

So some some cancers, let’s say get gastric, will have preoperative chemotherapy because there’s a lot of evidence to show that patients who have the preoperative chemotherapy do better than those to go straight to surgery.
So remember, there’s a big difference between neo adjuvant and adjuvants. Neoadjuvant is before surgery sometimes to try and get the tumour to become smaller, to make it operable.
Adjuvant is essentially the tumour has been taken away. In theory, there’s nothing left there. But there is hard evidence that patients that have no chemotherapy after their cancer surgery operation compared with cancer patients that have adjuvant therapy, the adjuvant therapy patients will do better if they are offered that.
Overall, is this patient suitable for radical ie potentially curative cancer? We say potentially because you never know what’s going to happen in the future.
Or should they have palliative therapy. So that’s chemotherapy, knowing that you’re not going to cure the patient. But the aim there is to extend that person’s life.
Or palliative care, which is no treatment at all. And they allow the disease to progress. They’re not fit enough for any other treatment.
If the patient has decided, they’re not fit enough for any form of treatment, and that she was going to make them worse. They will be then seen by another member of the MDT team called Palliative Care Physicians, and they’re supported by CNS’s and CNS. You saw in the previous slide is cancer nurse specialist.















