From Receptor Signal to Perception Flashcards
INTRO
- linking retinal filtering of edges to perception
- visual processing beyond retina in primate/human brain
- human/animal colour vision
WHY DOES RETINA FILTER EDGES SO EARLY IN VISUAL PATHWAY?
RAW IMAGE PROJECTION
- receptor signals are distributed spatially in continuous/noisy patterns; threshold required to detect contrasts
PROCESSED IMAGE
- contrast edges (areas of change) contain info
VISUAL PROCESSING: EARLY STAGES
- involve edge filtering & enhancement
- lateral inhibition (found in centre-surroind (CS) receptive fields of many retina ganglion cells) explain hard-wired phenomena in perception ie. Herrman grid
- we see grey dots that aren’t there; during eye movements, same part of image is viewed by foveal receptors & ganglion cells/peripheral ones
- CS receptive fields = smallest in fovea (highest spatial resolution) & larger the further in periphery of retina they are
HUMAN SPATIAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY (CSF) FUNCTION
- ganglion cells w/CS receptive fields:
1. enhance edges
2. compresses info (only respond when in receptive field)
3. filters info according to spatial frequencies (dif sized receptive fields/varying sensitivity across retina)
OWSLEY (2016); GHIM & HODOS (2006)
- vision & aging
- inter/intraspecific variations in acuity/contrast sensitivity
- both humans (Owsley) & birds (Ghim & Hodos) have similar negative correlation between contrast sensitivity & spatial frequency
CROWDED VISUAL SCENES
- seeing/recognising objects/mates/predators/prey = important for many tasks
- BUT visual scenes = oft crowded (typically not monochrome); contrast enhancement of edges = important for many visual tasks
- major tasks of visual system = segregating objects/backgrounds automatically/quickly
- other tasks require further computations to extract info
EGELHAAF ET AL. (2012); KANG ET AL (2012)
- spatial vision in insects = fascilitated by shaping dynamics of visual input through behavioural action
- camoflauge through active choice of resting spot/body orientation in moths
- insects land preferably at edge of objects
- moths actively choose spots; vary orientation to align w/lines in background for better camoflauge against avian predators
HATEREN ET AL. (1990)
- insects discriminate/generalise stripe patterns & recognise illusory contours
- bees were trained w/variations of stripe pattern; each tested group learned to discriminate particular orientation of these patterns; experiment trained bees to Kanisza rectangles
LOOKING: PHOTORECEPTOR SIGNALS
- change very quickly; are noisy
- movements (eyes/head/body) change/stabilise gaze for very short periods of time; fast main function filtering decomposing images into elementary features in peripheral visual system layers
- early segregation fed into parallel visual streams for unconscious/conscious visual perception
ACTIVELY LOOKING & SEEING: UNCONSCIOUS PERCEPTION
- can be fast/slow/filtered depending on task/pathway can be invariant/selective/less noisy
- guides fast/slow actions; analyses scenes/objects; changes are perceived via task outcomes (ie. consequence of beh response/change in internal state/top-down control (ie. gaze/conscious decision-making in humans))
SEEING: CONSCIOUS VISUAL PERCEPTION
- in humans = stable/slow/invariant/affected by filtering BUT less selective than unconscious perception/low noise
- only pronounced eye/head/body movements result in perceived change of viewed scene/object; conscious vision seems relevant for some specific tasks; can exert some top-down control but mostly results from processes at lvl 1/2; some = hard-wired
- humans = difficult to generate evidence clearly separating domains 2/3
- animals = lvl 3 studied w/brain imaging in monkeys/modelling
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO STUDYING SENSING/PERCEPTION
PSYCHOPHYSICS
NEUROANATOMY
FUNCTIONAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY/NEUROGENETICS
THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCE/COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING
METH APPROACHES: PSYCHOPHYSICS
- links variation in stimulus w/changes in beh (ie. eye/body responses/verbal responses/task acquisition/execution)
METH APPROACHES: NEUROANATOMY
- provides info about connectivity in sensory organs/brain/motor systems
METH APPROACHS: FUNCTIONAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY/NEUROGENETICS
- links neural response patterns to connectivity/behaviour
- tests concepts/algorithms