Freedom of Speech + Assembly Flashcards

1
Q

What is speech?

A

Words, symbols, and expressive conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

list (2)

expressive conduct is speech when:

A
  1. it is inherently expressive -OR-
  2. the conduct is intended to convey a message and reasonably likely to be perceived as conveying a message
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is unprotected speech

A

categories of speech that are speech but NOT protected under 1A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

list (2)

Incitement (speech) can be censored if:

A
  1. Intended to produce an imminent lawless action and
  2. Likely to produce such action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fighting words can be censored if:

A

likely to incite immediate physical retaliation in an average person

annoying words wont do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True threats can be censored if:

A

words that have the intent of conveying a serious threat of bodily harm to someone

** even if don’t intend to carry out **

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is obscene speech protected?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

list (3)

Speech is obscene if:

A
  1. appeals to prurient interest in sex - using a contemporary community standard
    1. aka is the speech trying too hard to turn you on
  2. is patently offensive - using contemporary community standards -AND-
  3. lacks serious value - using nat’l reasonable person standard contemporary community standard aka is it grossly offensive to local community?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are mere nudity, soft-core porn, and dirty words obscene?

A

NO - protected under 1A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can cartoons sexualizing minors be banned?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What must P show for defamation:

A

actual malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

list (2)

How does P prove actual malice

A

Must show through clear and convincing evidence that defamatory statement was made with:

  1. knowledge that it was false OR
  2. reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity aka reg flags that info in statement was in fact false
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

list (2)

who are public officials

A
  1. ppl holding or running for elective office at any level -AND-
  2. public employees in position of public importance (prosecutors, police officers, schools principle)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

who are public figures

A

people who

  1. assumed roles of prominence in society
  2. achieved pervasive fame and notoriety -OR-
  3. thrust themselves into particular public controversies to influence their resolution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

list (3)

If defamatory statement is about public officials, P must show:

A
  1. Defamation elements +
  2. falsity +
  3. some degree of fault
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If P is a private figure and defamatory speech about them involves a matter or public concern,

1) What does the P need to show to recover
2) What damages does the P recover

A
  1. Actual damages → Negligence
  2. Punitive/Presumed damages → Actual Malice (made statements in knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of truth)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

If P is a private figures and defamatory speech about involves a matter or private concern,

A

1A does not appy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Commercial speech is

(iow: what falls under commercial speech)

A

ads, promotions, brand marketing etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Commercial speech is not protected if

A

It is:

  1. false
  2. misleading or
  3. about illegal products
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

List (3)

Regulations on commercial speech are upheld if

What test?

A

Intermediate scrutiny test

  1. Serves a substantial govt interest
  2. Directly advances that interest AND
  3. is narrowly tailored to serve that interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

General speech restrictions are categorized as:

A

Content based

or

content neutral

22
Q

What are content based regulations

A

Restriction based on the message (content)

23
Q

What are content neutral regulations

A

Restriction regardless of the message

24
Q

Content based regulations are subject to what test

A

Strict Scrutiny

25
Content **neutral** regulations are subject to what test
Intermediate scrutiny
26
What is the two prong IS test for **content neutral** clause?
1. advance **impt** interest **unrelated** to suppression of speech 2. cant **substantially burden** speech more than necessary to meet govt interest - *time, place, manner on how speech can occur* *\*\**NOTE: *regulation* *does not have to be a perfect fit (SS) but close \*\**
27
Speech restrictions on gov't property depend on:
What type of gov't property *public forum, designated public forum limited public forum, or nonpublic forum*
28
public forum
public property that has historically been open to speech-related activities
29
public property that has historically been open to speech-related activities is called a
public forum
30
designated public forum
public property that HAS **NOT** been historically open to speech-related activities **BUT** which gov't has opened for such activities on a **permanent or limited basis** by practice or policy
31
public property that HAS **NOT** been historically open to speech-related activities **BUT** which gov't has opened for such activities on a **permanent or limited basis** by practice or policy is called a
designated public forum
32
If a speech regulation is subject to SS, this means that the regulation must be
necessary to achieve a compelling interest
33
If a speech regulation is subject to IS, this means that the regulation must be
1. narrowly tailed **-AND-** 2. leave open **alternative** mean of communication
34
In a **public** **forum or designated public forum**, scrutiny used is:
1. Content-based → SS 2. Content-neutral → IS 1. narrowly tailed **-AND-** 2. leave open **alternative** mean of communication
35
how are **injunctions** against speech in public forums treated
same as other speech restrictions CB → SS CN → IS
36
limited public forum
gov't forums **not** historically open generally for speech and assembly **BUT** opened for specific speech activity *(school gym used to host a debate for a community issue)*
37
gov't forums **not** historically open generally for speech and assembly **BUT** opened for specific speech activity
limited public forum
38
nonpublic forum
gov't property **NOT** historically open generally for speech and assembly and **NOT** held open for specific speech activities (*ie military bases or gov't workplaces)*
39
gov't property **NOT** historically open generally for speech and assembly and **NOT** held open for specific speech activities
nonpublic forum
40
In a **limited** **public** and **nonpublic** **forum,** scrutiny used is:
If regulation is CB or CN and: 1. **View-point based** → SS 2. **View-point neutral** → reasonably related to a **legit** govt purpose
41
Speech restricted in pubic schools applies to which grades?
primary and secondary **NOT** public universities (use forum doctrine)
42
Personal student speech **on** campus is restricted if: drugs?
causes substantial disruption drugs dont need any showing of disruption can be outright banned
43
Personal student speech **off** campus restricted?
It depends *if it has to do with. cheating, bullying, threats etc **restricted***
44
Restriction related to school's teaching restricted if:
**reasonably related** to **legitimate** pedagogical concerns *includes students speaking as part of an activity, band playing, cheerleading etc*
45
# list (2) Is it protected speech if it's by a **public employee** regarding **private** concern ?
1. **No** if it is **disruptive to** work environment 2. Employer can punish if employee (1) speaks during job and (2) pursuant to **employees official duties …** even if speech is about a **matter of _public_ concern**
46
If speech is a matter of **public concern** but not made pursuant to employee's duties:
use a **balancing test** value of speech vs. effect on workplace environment
47
If speech is a matter of **private concern and** not made pursuant to employee's duties:
unclear test - appears protected
48
49
50
51
Prior restraints that **prevent** speech ***before*** it occurs
**RARELY ALLOWED** CB → SS; CN → IS but govt has a **heavy** burden to justify a prior restraint ***_Example_**: injunction **allowed** to prevent releasing D-day invasion plans **vs.** injunction **not allowed** to prevent release of Panama papers*
52
# list (3) To have a valid **prior restraint** need:
1. safeguard is narrowly drawn, reasonable, and definite 2. injunction must be **properly** sought 3. must be a **prompt** and **final judicial** determination