Authentication, Writings, and Real Evidence Flashcards
What level of proof is needed for a writing to be authenticated?
Proof that is sufficient to support a jury finding** **of** **genuineness
List (8), “X-Plethoraas”
What are the methods of authentication
- X-rays, EKGs etc
- Photographs and Videos
- Reply Letter Doctrine
- Eyewitness Testimony
- Handwriting verifications
- Opponent’s Admission
- Ancient documents
- Admit through pleadings or stipulation
List (4), WANT
How are X-Rays, EKGs, etc established as authentic?
Lay-person cannot authenticate instead must show:
- W: Machine was in working order
- A: Process used was accurate
- N: Establish that machine has not been tampered with
- T: Operator was qualified/trained to operate machine
List (2)
When are Photographs and Videos admissible?
Admissible only if:
- Portrayal: Photo/video was identified by witness as a portrayal of facts relevant to issue at hand
- Verification: verified by witness as fair and accurate representation of those facts
Define
Reply Letter Doctrine
A writing can be authenticated by evidence that the writing was written into response to a communication to the alleged author
Define
How does Eyewitness testimony authenticate a writing
Writing authenticated by someone who saw the writing executed or heard the writing being acknowledged
NOTE: Testimony can be by anyone
ex: execution of a will
List (3)
Handwriting verifications
Authenticate that handwriting is genuine through:
- Opinion of lay witness who has familiarity with alleged writer’s handwriting
- Opinion of expert who has compared writing with samples of alleged writer’s handwriting
- Jury/fact-finder’s comparison of writing with samples of alleged writer’s handwriting
List (2)
How does an Opponent’s Admission authenticate a writing
Opponent authenticates writing either through:
- admission -or-
- acts upon the writing as it being authentic
List (3)
Ancient Documents
A document can be authenticated by evidence that it:
- is at least 20 years old
- is in a condition which creates no suspicion to it’s authenticity
- found in a place where such document would likely be kept
Applies to all writings not just dispositive instruments (i.e. wills + deeds)
Ancient documents hearsay exception
the related hearsay exception for ancient document will only apply if the document was created before 1998.
Rationale: older documents are presumably more reliable because they are less likely to have been doctored up to win a lawsuit.
List (2)
Unattended camera - admissible?
YES if can show that
- Camera properly operating at relevant time
- Photo or video was downloaded from the camera which recorded the event
List (2)
Through what means can oral statements be authenticated
- Voice identification
- Telephone conversations
Define
Voice identification
Voice can be ID’ed by anyone who has heard the voice at any time (including after litigation has begun)
List (4)
Voice in Telephone conversations can be authenticated by
By a party to the phone convo who:
- Recognize: party (who was part of convo) recognized speaker’s voice
- Certain facts: speaker had knowledge of certain facts only a particular person would have
- Voice answering: party called a particular person’s number and voice answered as that person or person’s residence
- Business: called a business and spoke with a person who answered Qs related to the business
Self-Authenticating Documents
Hint: what type of evidence is not required?
Documents that by themselves prove that extrinsic evidence is NOT required
Best Evidence Rule
(aka original document rule)
To prove content of writing, recording, or photo the ORIGINAL writing, recording, photo must be produced if terms of writing, or content of recording, or photo are MATERIAL.
When is secondary evidence (aka not the original writing) permitted under the Best Evidence Rule (original document rule)
Only when there is a satisfactory excuse for the original’s absence