FP - Biological explanations of offending behaviour: Genetic and neural Flashcards
Epigenetics
Refers to the material in each cell of the body that acts like a set of ‘switches’ to turn genes on or off.
Genetic explanations
The likelihood of behaving in a particular way is determined by a person’s genetic make-up, i.e. it is inherited from parents.
Neural explanations
Involve areas of the brain and nervous system and the action of chemical messengers in the brain known as neurotransmitters in controlling behaviour.
What do genetic explanations propose?
That one or more genes predispose individuals to criminal behaviour.
What do we talk about in genetic explanations of offending behaviour?
Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA)
Cadherin 13 (CDH13)
Diathesis-stress
What type of explanation is the genetic and neural approach?
Biological explanation
What is the case study for personality change via brain damage?
Explain it
Gage, 1894
Railway worker - catastrophic damage to pre-frontal lobes caused by a metal bolt catapulting through his cheek and up through his eye into his brain (pre-frontal area).
Recovered physically but went from being a sober, quiet family man to a violent drunk.
Pre-frontal lobes keep behaviour in check, moderate impulses.
What was Mobley’s claim (he was ‘born to be criminal’) based on?
Research by Han Brunner.
What is the key study for genetic explanations and the MAOA gene?
Brunner, 1993
What did Brunner (1993) do?
A study of violence in a family with genetic abnormality.
What was the aim of Brunner’s (1993) study?
To explain the behaviour of a large family in the Netherlands where the males are affected by a syndrome of borderline mental retardation and abnormals violent behaviour (i.e. impulsive aggression, arson, attempted rape, exhibitionism).
What was the method of Brunner et als. (1993) study on a dutch family?
Clinical examination of male family members and comparison with normal family members.
What did the clinical examination of the dutch family studied by Brunner include?
Behavioural examination.
Clinical examination.
DNA analysis.
What was found in the behaviour examination of the dutch family studied by Brunner?
- Repeated episodes of aggressive and sometimes violent behaviour (often out of proportion to provocation).
- Sleep disturbances and night terrors.
- Inappropriate sexual behaviour towards sisters and female relatives.
- Arson.
What was found in the clinical examination of the dutch family studied by Brunner?
- All 9 males mentally retarded (average IQ 85). Only 1 completed primary education (all unaffected males attended school and were employed).
- All females, including carriers, appear normal.
What was found in the DNA analysis of the dutch family studied by Brunner?
- Data was collected from the analysis of urine samples over a 24h period.
- All affected males showed genetic mutations in the genes producing MAO-A.
What explanation did Brunner give for the aggressive males having genetic mutations in the genes producing MAO-A causing their behaviour?
MAO-A breaks down and removes 3 neurotransmitters; noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin.
Therefore, lower activity levels of MAO-A will lead to increased levels of these nt (arousal, emotional arousal and sleep).
What are the consequences of the affected males in Brunner’s study having lower activity levels of MAO-A?
- Increased serotonin may have caused their criminal behaviours as impulse control is inhibited.
- Low levels of dopamine and noradrenaline have been known to cause spontaneous and irritable aggression in animals so could be responsible for their criminal behaviour.
- Disturbed behaviour may also have been due to arousal seeking behaviour.
Briefly explain the case of Stephen Mobley
(1966-2005)
- Convicted murderer executed by the state of Georgia for the 1991 killing of John C. Collins, a 25y/o college student working nights as a Domino’s Pizza store manager.
- On appeal, Mobley’s attorneys advanced a novel argument that Mobley was genetically predisposed to seeking violent solutions to conflict.
- The case was described as “perhaps the most widely cited case in which defence lawyers used genetic factors in the defence of their client”.