forgetting Flashcards
what is the two types of interference
proactive and retro active interference
what is proactive interference
old memories interfere with new memories
e.g. writing jan 2024 when its jan 2025
what is retro active interference
new memories interfere with old memories
e.g. forgetting how to do long division manually after learning how to do it on a calculator
strengths of the interference theory of forgetting
1) support from research by McGeoch and McDonald on accuracy of recall. similar words = confusion and worse recall
2) practical application. tulving pps learned categorical list one at time. improved when categories given. shows only temporarily loose info
3) real life evidence. Baddeley and Hitch rugby players + remembering names. interference irl
weakness for inference theory of forgetting
P; methodological issue
E: often time between learning and recall is short
E: tries to stop effect of drop outs
L: does not accurately reflect how memory works irl
what are the two features of retrieval failure as a theory for forgetting
context dependant and state dependant
description of context dependant
context in which information is learned is the cue
description of state dependant
state in which the infomation is learned is the cue
research for context dependant
Gorden + Baddeley
- 4 conditions = learned/ recalled underwater and learned/ recalled on land
- 50% better recall when in same context
- cues do improve
research for state dependant
Carter and Cassady
- 4 conditions = learned/ recalled on AH and learned/ recalled on placebo
- performance was best when the state remained the same for learning and recall
strengths for retrieval failure as a theory of forgetting
1) practical application - Baker and chewing gum - recall best when chewing gum at learning and recall. useful ways to improve memory
2) real life examples - upstaris and forget. context of learning and recall are different struggle to remember. positive suggestion for retrieval
weaknesses for retrieval failure as a theory of forgetting
1) criticises by Gordon and Baddeley as limited. changed recall test for recognition and found no difference in results in state. only occurs during free recall
2) lacks falsifiability as can’t prove right or wrong. assume cue has been encoded. based on assumption as cannot tell is encoded or not