Forensics - Cognitive explanations Flashcards
what is level of moral reasoning
- ways a person thinks about right and wrong
what is moral development
Kholberg
- created the theory of moral reasoning
- offenders show a lower level of moral reasoning
- found that a group of violent youths were at a significantly lower level
what is Kholber’s theory of moral reasoning
Level 1 - pre conventional morality
- rules obeyed to avoid punishment
- rules obeyed for personal gain
Level 2 - conventional morality
- rules obeyed for approval
- rules obeyed to maintain social order
Level 3 - post-conventional morality
- rules challenged if they infringe on rights of others
- individuals have a personal set of ethics and morals
what is the link between criminality and moral reasoning
- offenders more likely to be classified at the pre-conventional morality
- at this level offenders can get away with crime and gain rewards
what are the strengths of moral reasoning
Palmer and Hollin
- compared moral reasoning in 332 non-offenders and 126 convicted offenders
- answered 11 moral dilemma questions
- offender group showed less mature moral reasoning than non-offender
what are the limitations of moral reasoning
Thornton and Reid
- people who committed crimes for financial gain were more likely to show pre-conventional moral reasoning than those convicted of impulsive crimes
- pre-conventional moral reasoning is associated with crimes where offenders believe they have a change of evading punishment
what are cognitive distortions
- faulty biased and irrational ways of thinking that mean we perceive ourselves, other people and the world inaccurately
what is hostile attribution bias
- tendency to judge ambiguous situations as aggressive and threatening when they may not be
Schoenberg and Justye
- presented 55 violent offenders with images of emotionally ambiguous faces
- violent offenders more likely to perceive the images as angry and hostile
what is minimalization
- downplay the significance of an event or emotion
Barbaree
- among 26 incarcerated rapists
- 54% denied they committed the crimes
- 40% minimised the harm they caused
what is the strength of cognitive distortions
Real World application
- CBT therapy challenges irrational thinking
- offenders encouraged to face up to their actions and establish a less distorted view of their actions
- reduced denial and minimalization in therapy is highly associated with a reduced risk of reoffending
what is the limitation of cognitive distortions
Howitt and Sheldon
- gathered questionnaires responses from sexual offenders
- non-contact sex offenders used more cognitive distortions than contact sex offenders
- those who had a previous history of offending were more likely to use distortions as a justification
- distortions not used in the same way