forensic psychology Flashcards
what are the 2 issues when defining crime?
crime is culturally specific i.e, a crime in one culture isnt a crime in another e.g. having one than one wife
crime is historically specific i.e. a crime changes over time e.g. homosexuality used to be a crime
define crime
any act which breaks the law and warrants a form of punishment
what are the 3 main ways of measuring crime?
offender surveys
victim surveys
official statistics
describe and evaluate offender surveys
offenders voluntarily survey the number of crimes they have committed. it targets groups of likely offenders
W- people may be unwilling to give up information about themselves
describe and evaluate victim surveys
asks 50,000 random households to document the crimes they have been victim to in the last year
W- don’t account for victimless crimes e.g. littering
W- ‘telescoping’ may occur when the victim misremembers the crime as happening in the last year when in fact it didn’t.
S- has greater accuracy than OS and may include crimes that weren’t reported to the police
describe and evaluate official statistics
is the total number of crimes reported by the police.
published by the home office annually
it allows gov to develop crime prevention strategies
W- many crimes are unreported due to embarrassment, fear of reprisals or considered a ‘family matter’. 75% of crimes go unreported, known as ‘dark crimes’
national statistics denote how successful the gov is therefore they may influence the figures to make themselves look good
because crime is historically specific it makes it difficult to judge how crime has changed
what are the 2 aspects of offender profiling
topdown approach and bottomup approach
how was the topdown approach developed
through carrying out interviews on 36 sexually motivated serial killers. they used this to develop categories of crime.
what are the 2 main aspects of the topdown approach
organised and disorganised killers
describe the characteristics of organised killers
crime scene- evidence of a planned attack, victim is deliberately targets as a ‘type’, maintained control and operate with surgical precision
offender- above average intelligence, in skilled profession, socially and sexually competent and often married with kids
describe the characteristics of a disorganised killer
crime scene- no planning (spontaneous), impulsive nature, body still at crime scene with little control from the offender
offender- below average IQ, unskilled profession, history of sexual dysfunction and lives alone and close to the scene
evaluate the topdown approach, including HOWARD and HOLMES and 2 other weaknesses
it can only be applied to crimes such as murder and rape, HOWARD, a police officer claimed that his son had killed everyone in his family and then committed suicide. analysis of the crime scene showed the killer was a skilled marksman, the police officer was later convicted. crimes like burlgary isnt suited for topdown approach because it reveals little about the offender
HOLMES suggested that there are 4 types of killers, visionary, missionary, power and hedonistic, the 2 categories are too simplistic
1 made by 36 serial killers which question generalisability
2 the bottomup approach is a better alternative
how was the bottomup approach developed?
by david canter, forensic psychologists take evidence and develop a hypothesis about the likely characteristics and motivations and social background of the offender.
describe investigative psychology regarding the bottomup approach
details of the crime is matched with statistical analysis of typical offender behaviour. this included; interpersonal coherance (in which the offenders actions may reflect their day-to-day behaviour), significance of time/place (which may indicate where the offender lives) and forensic awareness (describes individuals who have been investigated before)
describe geographical profiling regarding the bottomup approach, refer to the marauder and the commuter
is based on the spatial consistency in which the offender restricts their work to specific areas they’re familiar with. according to the circle theory, if a circle is drawn linked to all the crimes the offender will live somewhere in the middle.
the marauder operates in close proximity to their home.
the commuter travels a distance from their base
describe the investigation that supports the idea that supporters geographical profiling regarding internal representations
CANTER used the location of John Duffy (the railway rapists) attacks to predict that hed be involved with the railway network- it turned out that he was a carpenter for British rail
evaluation of bottumup approach, including LUNDRIGAN and CANTER and COPSON and 2 other strengths and 1 strength
LUNDRIGAN and CANTER identified patterns of geographical constancy in 120 murder cases using a program called ‘smallest space analysis’
S1- can be applied to a wider range of offences than the topdown approach
S2- more scientific as it attempts to add statistical procedure
COPSON surveyed 48 British police and identified that advice from profiler was useful 89% of the time but was only accurate 3% of the time
W1- is deterministic in terms of interpersonal coherence that a offenders personality in day-to-day life will determine his behaviour at the crime scene
describe and evaluate LOMOBROSO’s biological explanation for criminal behaviour
1 W and 1S and GOERING
criminals are ‘genetic throwbacks’ who have failed to evolve and therefore have a savage animal nature which means they cant meet the demands of living in a civilized society
they have specific characteristics, dark skin, extra toes/nipples/fingers, prominent jaw.
murders have bloodshot eyes, curly hair and long ears.
rapists have fleshy lips, glinting eyes and projecting ears
fraudesters are thin and reedy
all are insensitive to pain and have slang tattoos and are unemployed
W- is clearly controversial and offensive
S- he did attempt to study criminal behaviour in a scientific way
GOERING, lomobroso’s didnt look at non-criminals as a control group and all his Ps had psychological disorder.. Goering conducted a study of 3000 criminals and noncriminals. he concluded that there is no evidence that offenders are a distinctive group