Fixation disparity Flashcards
What is fixation disparity?
Fixation disparity (FD) is a small misalignment or offset of the visual axes
Visual axes do not intersect precisely…slight under or over convergence
Fixation point not projected onto centre of fovea in both eyes. It occurs without causing diplopia, still have BSV as this is still within Panum’s Fusional Area (PFA)
Fixation disparity is also known as
An ‘associated phoria’
Amount the visual axes drift without dissociation
Exo disparity- axes slightly divergent
Eso disparity- axes slightly convergent
Vertical disparity
Can also have a torsional FD but not measured clinically
Eso fixation disparity is when
there is slight over-convergence of right eye
Stimulation of point nasal to fovea
Inward shift of the horopter
Object lies beyond horopter
Uncrossed retinal disparity
Exo fixation disparity is when
There is slight under-convergence
Stimulation of a point temporal to fovea
Outward shift of the horopter
Object lies in front of horopter
Crossed retinal disparity
BSV and fixation disparity
As long as the magnitude of the Fixation Disparity is not larger than the width of PFA (Panum’s Fusional area) the patient can maintain BSV.
This is because the disparate retinal points are within Panum’s fusional area.
Fixation disparity norms
Typically less than 10 minutes of arc (Elliott, 2013) (p167)
Mean -6.6 mins of arc (exo)
Range +20 (eso) to -60 (exo) mins arc (Jaschinski et al, 2010)
10 mins arc = 0.16 degrees = approx. 0.32 PD
60 mins arc = 0.96 degrees = approx. 1.92 PD
Fixation disparity size
‘A common misunderstanding is the belief that FD is comparable to a small angle of anomaly’ (Decker et al., 1975)
Not related to movement on CT so not directly comparable to a microtropia
Is it the stage prior to anomalous BSV? (Crone, 1969)
Orthophoria -> fixation disparity -> heterophoria -> microtropia (Crone, 1969)
Fixation disparity is measured by
Optoms:
Sometimes: 85%
Always: 35%
(Karania and Evans, 2006)
Fixation disparity testing to check
Eyes partially dissociated
Part of target seen by each eye (monocular markers) – are these aligned?
Part target seen by both eyes (binocular/fusion lock)
Nonius Lines
Presented dichoptically (one to each eye)
Eyes are associated (not magnitude of heterophoria)
Measure the offset
Tests for fixation disparity
Mallet Unit
Saladin card
Wesson card
Infrared eye tracker system (De Luca et al, 2009)
Mallet unit for fixation disparity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFwuXIV66Js
Near or distance (FD can differ)
Polarised filter glasses
Fusion lock = OXO (Eyes are assoc as viewing similar images which aid sensory fusion)
One red line seen by RE, other by LE
Give prismatic power until aligned
Rather than magnitude of FD the tests measure the strength of prism required to eliminate the FD = Aligning prism
Can turn test to measure vertical FD
Saladin card
Polarisation for monocular markers
Which circle contains lines which are aligned?
Wesson card
Polarisation for monocular markers
One eye sees lines and the other sees an arrow…
which line does the arrow point to?
Does fixation disparity matter?
Large FD can be associated with asthenopic symptoms
Can cause stress on the binocular system
Associated with reduced stereopsis
If there is no fixation disparity
If no FD there are better fusional reserves to cope with any existing heterophoria
E.g. patient with 3 dioptre heterophoria…
If no/little FD = asymptomatic
If larger FD = some may have asthenopic symptoms
Should prisms be prescribed to eliminate FD?