Final Flashcards
Type of questions asked in comparative politics
Cause-effect; why
Empirical
Ask and explain why the world is the way it is
Normative
How the world ought to be
Concepts
Abstract ideas we use to think about the phenomena, facts and processes we study
Good concepts are
Clear, coherent, consistent, useful
Conceptualization
Process of creating and selecting social science concepts we want to use
Operationalization
Process of making basic concepts measurable
Challenges of measurement
Validity- extent that a measure captures what we are researching
Reliability- extent that a measure produces consistent results
Theory
Explanation for political phenomena
Hypothesis
Specific and empirically testable prediction that is often derived from a theory
Empirical evidence
Facts supporting an argument
Correlation
Relationship between two variables in which they tend to move in a predictable relationship to one another
Causation
Relationship between two variables in which change in one variable causes change in another
Comparative politics
Su field of political science that explains political phenomena using the comparative method
Omitted variable
Z–>X & Z–>Y
Reverse causation
X
Endogeneity
XY
Intervening variable
X–>Z–>Y
Spurious correlation
X?Y
Empirical critique
Identifying evidence that does not support a given theory–deviant cases
Theoretical critique
Showing logical limitations
The comparative method
Examine cases, look at how variables interact, focus on causal relations
Most similar system design
Similar case, different outcomes
Most different system design
Different cases, same outcome
Comparative checking
Testing conclusions from a set of comparisons against additional cases or evidence
Within case comparison
Comparing variation over time or in distinct parts of a single case
Limits of the comparative method
Relationship between variables are probability and likelihood, not laws; can’t have controlled experiments; sometimes only correlation not causation
The modern state
Central political institution with a monopoly on the legitimate use of force, expected to perform certain functions
Nation state
Represent and embody one nation
Nation
A large and geographically bound population with a common history, culture, identity, political aspirations
Characteristics of modern state
Sovereignty, bureaucracy, impersonality
Sovereignty
Ultimate authority within specifically demarcated territories
Bureaucracy
Organization with individuals operating under established, specific, and complex rules and procedures
Impersonality
States identified with institutions rather than their leaders
What do modern states typically do?
Defense, policing, taxation, manage economy, provide social welfare, provide infrastructure/other public goods
Regime
Fundamental rules and norms of politics, embodies basic principles of political life in a society
Government
Administrative apparatus of the state
O’Neil quote
If state is machinery, regime is programming, gov is operator
State capacity
States capacity to govern and perform its functions
Why do modern states emerge?
Bellicist theory: war made the state (centralized authority, tax, mobilize)
Economic theory: economic interest for ruling class
Cultural theory: Protestantism reshape attitudes toward institutions/emergence of nationalism
Diffusion theory: states w/military dominate; needs of economic interests pushed for state creation everywhere; state organization became cultural reality
Indicators measuring development
GDP, poverty rate, inequality, employment/inflation, HDI, happiness index, consumption
Potential costs of development
Loss of culture and tradition; environment/sustainability
Theories explaining development
Market v state (market is invisible hand v state intervention will push investment, coordinate, infrastructure)
Institutions: need to be strong & proper
Culture: high levels of trust/social capital; religious world views shaped incentives
Structural/systematic: world system favors rich countries; geography favors rich countries
Neoliberalism
Liberal democracy and market led development
Import substitution
State helps industries produce for domestic market by substituting these goods with previously imported
Historical institutionalism
Emphasis on the power of institutions to shape individual behavior and how this operates over time
New institutionalism
Emphasis on the power of institutions to shape individual behavior and the recent turn to this
Rational institutionalism
Emphasis on the power of institutions to shape individual behavior and implications for individuals strategic choices
Sociological institutions
How institutions create meaning
Authoritarianism
Favors closed, concentrated and hierarchies process of decision making
Personalistic dictatorship/sultan ian
Form of authoritarianism that centers on the personality of the dictator
Bureaucratic authoritarian regimes
State is controlled by a group of elites
Totalitarian regimes
Aims to control everything about the lives of its subject population
Theocracy
Controlled by religious leaders
Why do authoritarian regimes exist?
Historical institutionalism: coalitions have enduring effects
Poverty/inequality: more poverty effects because populace more concerned about economy, distrust
State weakness: weak institutions; may be predatory state or intervening variable
Political culture: cultural values more suited
Rational calculations/personal incentive
Barriers to collective action
Democracy
A form of regime associated with rule by the people with rights and liberties for citizens
Political v civil rights
Political: can participate in elections
Civil: freedom of speech, etc
Procedural democracy
Basic rules, procedures required
Substantive democracy
Emphasis on end goals
Democratization
Regime change becoming more democratic
Direct democracy
Direct citizen involvement
Representative democracy
Politicians represent the electorate
Why is there democracy?
Emergent middle class (urbanization, education, industrialization)
Modernization prevents breakdown (economic dev)
Norms and attitudes
Global powers (Cold War)
Institutions (federalism may mitigate conflict, electoral rules)
Prominent leaders as triggers (gandhi, Mandela)
Hybrid regimes
Regimes not in pure ideal forms
Electoral authoritarianism
Authoritarian regime but nominal elections are held
Competitive authoritarianism
Authoritarian regime that tolerates some political competition
Delegative democracy
democracy but electorate delegates much authority to the government
Illiberal democracy
Democracy but not all rights are protected
Why hybrid regimes?
Incomplete democratization (Russia) Authoritarian regime improves (China) Democratic breakdown (Venezuela)
Primitive communism
Egalitarian, common property
Modern communism
Create equality by eliminating private prett and market; no exploitation/repression
Marx evolution of human society
Primitive–>slavery–>feudalism–>capitalism–>communism
Why transition from capitalism–>communism?
Increased productivity, exploitative social relations; surplus
Socialism
Economic equality through state action
First communist regime
Commune of Paris
Communist regimes
Russia, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba
Pink states
Socialist democratic regimes in western and Northern European countries
Why did communism rise?
Marx: advance productivity-->class struggle-->working class Lenin: role of vanguard party (communist party) Mao: importance of strategy in revolutions; nationalism Intl: comminterm/ussr; WW2
Why did communism decline?
Adaptation of capitalism
Decay of communist regime (became totalitarian for privileged class, failure of planned economies)
Role of leadership (Gorbachev)
Intl: failed competition with lib democracies
Constitutions
Fundamental and supreme laws; est the basis of a political system and basis for other laws
Constitutionalism
Limitations of gov through a constitution
Constitutional design
Features of constitutions that form the basis of the political system
Types of constitutions
Authoritarian v democratic; flexible v rigid; federalism v unitary
Judicial review
Power of constitutional courts to determine the legality of laws
Is judicial review anti democratic?
Judges can defend basic rights (brown v board)
But judges not democratically elected
Federalism
Separation of powers among levels of gov
Unitarism
Unitary central gov
Why federalism?
Riker: bargain among regional actors (us)
Stepan: hold different groups together (Canada)
Federalism & social stability
Can support: give different groups some stake, serve as a safety valve
Can compromise: empower separatists
Federalism and democratic rights
Can allow different regions to have different laws
But different areas may end up with more/less rights
Federalism and economy
Can promote healthy competition
But can hurt economic stability (race to the bottom, overspending)
Legislature
Assembly with authority to make laws
Functions of legislatures
Representation, vote/debate legislation, control spending, oversee executive, socialize politicians
Types of legislatures
Unicameral- 1 chamber; bicameral- 2 chambers
District system
Voters select representatives from specific geographic constituencies
SMD
1 rep wins
FPP
Most votes wins