Family Law Flashcards
Uniform Interstate Family Support Act - Enforcement of Child Support (UIFSA)
been adopted by all states.
Under UIFSA, the state that originally issued a child support order has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the order if that state remains the residence of the obligee, the child, or the obligor and all parties do not consent to the jurisdiction of another forum.
UIFSA does not apply to divorce property-division disputes.
Child support orders cannot be modified retroactively
Fed law requires the states, as a condition of federal child-support funding adopt rules that absolutely forbid retroactive modification of the support obligation.
Prospective modification of child support
Typically available only when the petitioner can show a substantial change in circumstances.
A significant decrease in income is typically viewed as a substantial change, but some courts refuse to modify if the shift was voluntary. other courts look towards the intent
Many courts use a multifactor approach where court would consider the impact on the child (i.e likely duration of income loss, and the likelihood of a promotion that would ultimately be of benefit to the child).
Divorce property-division is non modifiable
division was made by court based on the circumstances at the time of the divorce and because the past cannot be ascertained, a property division award is not subject to a post-divorce modification
enforceability of a premarital agreement
Enforceability of an agreement turns on three factors: voluntariness, fairness, and
disclosure
*In considering whether a premarital agreement was voluntarily executed, courts look to whether there was fraud, duress, or coercion
*consulting w/ independent counsel, embarssement from cancelling wedding, and financial loss goes to voluntariness
enforceability of a premarital agreement under UPAA
the party against whom enforcement is sought must prove
(1) involuntariness or
(2) that “the agreement was unconscionable when it was executed” and that he or she did not receive or waive fair and reasonable disclosure and did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the other’s assets and obligations
Premarital agreements regarding child custody are unenforceable
courts are not bound by custody provisions in a prenup that could be injurious to child’s interest
marital property
assets acquired during the marriage except by gift, devise, or inheritance
continues to accrue until the marriage is dissolved
Divorce and division of property
in most states, only marital property—assets acquired during the marriage except by gift, devise, or inheritance—is subject to division at divorce.
In a minority of “hotchpot” jurisdictions, the court may divide all assets, whenever or however acquired.
A few states permit the division of
separate property in special circumstances, such as hardship.
an asset that is initially separate property may be partially transformed into marital property if
marital funds or significant postmarital effort by the owner spouse enhance its value or build equity
if marital funds are used to reduce mortgage indebtedness, such equity-building payments typically create marital property.
Child custody decisions standard
best interest of the child
best interest of the child factors
(1) the wishes of the child’s parent or parents as to his custody;
(2) the wishes of the child as to his custodian;
(3) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with his parent or parents, his siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interest;
(4) the child’s adjustment to his home, school, and community;
(5) domestic violence in the home; and
(6) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved.”
a court may not deny a parent child cutosdy based on parent’s
values or lifestyle unless evid shows that the parental conduct adversely affects the child
common law doctrine of nonintervention
disallows judicial intervention in an intact family
courts have used this doctrine to deny a support petition when couple is married and living together
May the government limit parental decisions?
parental right to the care, custody, and control of a child is constitutionally protected under the 14A, but if it appears that parental decisions will jeopardize the health or safety of the child, or have a potential for significant social burdens then gov can limit that
- vaccination mandate is within state’s police powers to protect public health
Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), a court may exercise juris over a petition for child custody only if
this State is the home State of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding,
or was the home State of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this State but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this State” and
no other state’s courts would have jurisdiction under the above standard or other courts having jurisdiction have declined to exercise it.
The federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA) grants exclsuive juris over a child-custody petition to…
a child’s home state
PKPA takes precedence over any conflicting state law under the supremacy clause
When a non-party seeks to obtain custody of a child from a fit legal parent
parent is accorded a preference.
Troxel case SCOTUS implied such a prefernece is constitutioally mandated and invalidated a statute that allowed for any person to petition for visitation at any time if in best interest of child
Under federal law, states are required to give full faith and credit to
child support awards from other states