Agency Flashcards
requirements for an agency relationship
1) consent by both the principal and the agent that the agent will act for the principal’s benefit, and
2) that the agent is subject to the principal’s control
scope of agent’s authority
A principal is not liable on a k entered into by an agent unless the agent had actual or apparent authority
apparent authority
exists when a principal’s communications to a third party cause the third party to reasonably believe that an agent is authorized to act, even if the principal and the purported agent never so agreed.
third party with whom the agent acts reasonably believes the actor has authority to act on behalf of the principal and that belief is traceable to the principal’s manifestation
actual authority
reasonably believes, in accordance with the principal’s manifestations to the agent, that the principal wishes the agent so to act
express: agent is given authority to act for the principal
implied: the authority that an agent has to take actions that are reasonably necessary to carry out the principal’s express instructions
Ratification
even if the agent did not have authority to enter into a transaction, the principal can ratify the acts (and thus become liable) by expressly or impliedly affirming or accepting the benefit of the acts, so long as the principal knew that material facts and had capacity
A person who purports to make a k with a third party on behalf of another person, lacking power to bind that person, gives
an implied warranty of authority to the third party and,
is subject to liability to the third party for damages for loss caused by the breach of that warranty, including loss of the benefit expected from performance by the principal.
An agent who purports to act on his own account, but in fact is making a k on behalf of an undisclosed principal, is
also a party to the k
rationale for this rule is that the third party has every reason in the case of an undisclosed principal and agency to
assume that the person with whom it contracts expects to be liable on the contract
When a third party contracts with a person that the third party knows is acting in an agency capacity for another but the third party is unaware of the identity of the principal, the principal for whom the agent acts is called a
partially disclosed principal
A partially disclosed principal can be liable on a contract entered into by an agent who
had actual or apparent authority
There can be no apparent authority in the case of an undisclosed principal bc
there are no manifestations from the principal to the third person
partnership liablity - UPA (1997) § 306(a)
partners of a general partnership are liable jointly and severally for all obligations of the partnership
partnership could become
obligated for the loss caused if partner was acting in the ordinary course of the partnership business.
UPA (1997) § 306(b) - partner liability for persons admitted to an exissting partnership
not personally liable for any partnership obligations
incurred before the person’s admission
UPA (1997) § 1001, a general partnership can make an election and become a LLP if
the partners approve the conversion by a vote equivalent to that necessary to amend the partnership agreement and,
the partnership then files a statement of qualification that specifies the name of the partnership, its principal office, and its election to be
an LLP
can also effectuate a conversion from partnership to LLP by
forming a new LLP and transfer the assets of the
old general partnership to the new LLP
UPA (1997) § 306(c), an obligation incurred while a partnership is an LLP
is solely a partnership obligation
To create a valid limited partnership, statutory requirements must be met
must include a general partner who has signed the initial Certificate of Limited Partnership filed with the Secretary of State
responsibilities of members in limited partnership
limited partners have limited liablity (limited to their capital contributions)
general partners are liable for all partnership obligations and manage control of the business.
Respondeat Superior
employers are liable for the actions of an employee when the employee is acting within the scope of his employment
Employee acting within the scope of his employment
physical conduct in the
performance of the services is subject to the employer’s control or right to control
An employee’s act is not within the scope of employment when it occurs within an independent course of conduct not intended by the employee to serve any purpose of the employer
factors for independent contractor vs. employee
1) the level of skill required
to perform the work,
2) who supplies the instrumentalities used,
3) the duration of the relationship,
4) and whether the work is part of the principal’s regular business.
No single factor is
determinative.
An employee’s conduct is within the scope of his employment if
(1) it is of the kind that the
employee is employed to perform;
(2) it occurs substantially within the authorized time and
space limits; and
(3) it is motivated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the employer.
The fact that the act was not authorized is not determinative
Employer employee liability for torts
Generally, an employer is subject to vicarious liability for torts committed by an employee acting within the scope of employment
or where third party reasonably believes that the agent or other actor has
authority to act on behalf of the principal and that belief is traceable to manifestations made by the principal.