Con Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

ex post facto clauses

A

prohibit enactment of retroactive criminal laws that

criminalize previously legal conduct,

impose a greater punishment than previously prescribed,

eliminate previously available defenses,

decrease gov’s previous burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

bill of attainder clauses

A

prohibit legisilation acts that inflict civil or criminal punishment against indentifiable persons (or groups of ppl) without a trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

to determine if congress can regulate an activity, courts consider whether

A

1) the activities are economic in nature (if so, a substantial effect is presumed),

2) the reg has a jurisidictional elements that limits its reach to activities w/ a direct connection to or effect on interstate commerce

3) there are express congressional findings concerning the activities’ effect on interestate commerce, and

4) there is a strong link between the regualted activity and that effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

nondelegation doctrine

A

prohibits congress from delegating purely legislative powers but allows congress to delegate its incidental powers (rulemaking, legisilative enforcement) if it provides an intelligble principle - ie, a clear statement defining

1) the policy congress seeks to advance
2) the agency to carry out that policy, and
3) the scope of that agency’s authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

level of scrutiny applies to content based law

A

strict scrutiny

gov show that it is necessary and narrowly tailored (least restrictive means) to achieve a compelling gov interest

very little over or under inclusivness is allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

level of scrutiny applied to a content-neutral law

A

intermediate scrutiny

permissible so long as the gov can show that it is narrowly tailored to achieve an important gov interest and leaves open alternative channels of communication

narrowly tailored = challenged law would achieve gov’s interest lest effecively if it were less or under inclusive

TPM test is satisifed so long as the reg promotes a substantial gov interest that would be achieved less effectively absent the regulation and leave open ample channels of communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Central Hudson test for gov regulation of commercial speech

A

1) speech must be lawful and not misleading,

2) statute must serve a substanital gov interest,

3) statute must directly advance that interest, and

4) the statute must be narrowly tailored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

all race based classifications imposed by gov must surivive strict scrutiny which requires the gov to prove

A

that these classifications are necessary to achieve a compelling gov interest - eg, to remedy its own history of racial discrimination*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

express preemption occurs when

A

a fed law is enacted under an exclusive fed power or explicitly bars state regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

implied preemption occurs when

A

there is no room for state regulation (field),

it is nearly impossible to comply with both laws (direct conflict), or

the state law frustrates the fed law’s purpose (indirect conflict)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the _____ clause renders a state law void and without effect when a fed law expressly or impliedly preempts it

A

supremacy clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

scotus has discretion to exercise appellate jurisidction over state spreme court decisions that present a federal Q unless

A

those actions are based on adequate and independent state grounds

once scotus reslves fed Q, must remand case to state supreme court if any state issues remain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

an exaction amounts to a 5th amend taking requiring just comepnsation unless government establishes

A

exaction exists when the gov enacts a reg that restricts the owners use of a property as a cond to allowing the owner to develop the land

these are taking under 5A unless gov can show a legit gov interest and rough proportionality (adverse impact of the proposed development is roughly proportional to the loss suffered by the property owner)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

exaction occurs when

A

a local gov conditions the issuance of a building or developmnt permit on a landowners promise to dedicate part of the property for public use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

severe (discriminatory) electorcal regulations are subjec to

A

strict scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ordinary (non-discriminatory) electoral regs are subject to

A

rational basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

gov’s regulation of protected commerical speech must

A

1) directly advance a substanital gov interest,

2) not be more extensive than necessary to serve that interest (satisifed if there’s a reasonable fit between the gov interest and the means chosen to achieve it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

1A protects the right of the press to

A

publish lawfully obtained, truthful information about matters of public signficance

1A doesnt shield press from generally applicable laws even if laws incidentially affect the press’s ability to gather and report the news

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

process for a treaty

A

approved by 2/3rd vote in senate (not house) before it can be ratified

then, treaty takes precedence over any conflicting state law pursuant to supremacy clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Market participant exception

A

The state may discriminate in favor of residents when buying or selling goods and services because the state is acting as a “market participant” rather than as a regulator of an economic activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

dormant commerce clause analysis

A

1) is the statute facially discriminatory?

2) if no, Q is whether it effectuates a legit local public interest and whether the burden if any is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits

3) if it is facially discrim then its invalid unless narrowly tailored to meet a legit purpose (less discrim means).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

11th amend

A

bars private parties and foreign govs from suing a state in federal court without state’s consent

doesnt bar suits brought by US or another state

*doesnt apply to suits vs public officials in their official capacity seeking an injunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

a state may treat men and women differently consistent w/ equal protections and provide separate facilities for each gender if state can

A

1) demonstrate the exceedingly persusaive justification for the separate treatment, and

2) demonstrating that the sepratae facilities are subsntially equivalent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

actions of private parties constitute state actions when

A

1) they have prformed a traditional public function,

2) there’s enforcement of certain private contracts;

3) there is joint action or entanglement between state and private actor; or

4) there’s state encouragement of private discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

analysis for 1A free speech viol

A
  1. state or private actor?
  2. if private actor, are they a state actor under public function standard?
  3. content based or content neutral reg?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

a law regulating unprotected speech needs to pass

A

rational basis

incitment, fighting words, threats, obsecnity, false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

SCOTUS has long held that public schools may not force their students to participate in

A

flag salute ceremony when it offends the political or religious beliefs of the students or their families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

when expression takes place on gov owned property, gov regulation of expression is asserted under the

A

public forum doctrine.

public street and sidewalks = traditional public forum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

when a state tries to reg expressive activity in a traditional public forum, it is prohibited from doing so based on the expressive acticity’s content unless

A

it survive strict scrutiny (narrowly tailored to achieve compelling gov interst)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

SCOTUS has held that the gov’s interest in keeping streets clean is insufficent to ban leafletting in the public streets as the gov power to reg with incidental effects on public sidewalk speech is very limited

A

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

14th amendment equal protection

A

not state shall deny to any person within its jurisidction the equal protection of the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

suspect classes

A

race
religion
citizenship
national origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

a federa statue abrogates 11th amendment immunity if

A

1) statute unambigiously asserts that it does so; and

2) congress enacted the statute under a poewr that may abbrogate 11th amendment immunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

NY v. Garcia

A

congress may not commander the state to regulate private conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

US v. VA

A

state laws that make classifications on basis of gender are uncosntitutional unless state can estalblish an exceedingly persuasive jusification for the classification

“exceedingly persussaive justificatin” servces important gov interest and doesnt rely upon outdated or overbroad generalizations and stereotypes

*case w/ separate men and women military schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

congress may condition receipt of federal funds to states if

A

1.) spending must be for general welfare

2) cond imposed by congress must be imposed unambiguously

3) cond imposed must be related to the federal interest in particular national projects/programs

4) cond must not be used to induce states to engage in unconstitutional activities,

5) a cond will be deemed improper if its so coercive to pass the point at which pressure turns into compulsion

37
Q

10th amendment

A

limits federal powers
federal gov may neither issue directeves requiring the states to address particular problems nor command states officers or their policital subdivision to administer or enforce a federal regualtory program

38
Q

15th amendment prohibits state and federal gov from

A

abridging right to vote by direct limitation or diluting voting power on the basis of race, color, or previous servitude

39
Q

Standard applied to burdens on 1A free exercise of religion

A

direct burdens = strict scrutiny

indirect burdens = rational basis

40
Q

Endorsement test

A

government displays of religion symbols violate establishment clause when overall context of the display would cause a reasonable person to conclude the display endorses religion

41
Q

congress has the sole power to impeach and remove

A

federal judges

42
Q

intermediate scrutiny

A

gov must prove that the classification is substantially related to an important gov interest

43
Q

dormant commerce clause

A

generally prohibits states from discriminating against or unduly burdening interestate commerce

A nondiscriminatory state law that imposes an “incidental” burden on interstate commerce will nonetheless be unconstitutional if the burden it imposes is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.”

*state can do so when congress explicitly authorized the conduct

44
Q

supremacy clause

A

fed law takes precedence over conflicting state laws so long as fed law is a valid exercise of congress’ emumerated powers

45
Q

a state tax affecting foreign commerce must

A

satisfy complte auto requirements: substantial nexus, fairly apportioned, non-discriminatory, and fairly related

such a tax must not create an inevitable risk of multiple taxation or prevent fed gov from speaking with one voice in foreign affairs

46
Q

commerce clause

A

congress may enact 3 types of regulations

1) regulate channels of interstate commerce (phone lines + highways),

2) regulate people and instrumentalities that work and travel in the channels of interstate commerce,

3) regulate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce

47
Q

gov can interfere w/ 1A freedom of assocation by punishing persons who

A

1) are active memebrs of subverise organization;

2) know of the org’s illegal objectives

3) specifically intend to further those objectives

48
Q

under 1A freedom of association, the gov cannot force a group to…

A

accept members who would significantly burden its views unless that interference is necessary to achieve a compelling gov interest

49
Q

congress can only overturn an exec agency’s actions by

A

enacting new legilsation which requires bicameralism and presentment

50
Q

pres has absolute authority to remove fed exec officers. congress may impose restrictions on this process only for officers who

A

1) belong to a mutlimeber body that’s balanced along partisian lines and exericses exec power; or

2) lack policymaking or admin authority

51
Q

once congress delegates power to an exec agency, it cannot interfere w/ agency’s functions without

A

satisfying the legilsative action process (bicameralsim and presentment)

any attempt to bypass this process is an unconstitutional legislative veto

52
Q

state’s police power

A

power to enact and enforce laws that are reasonably related to protecting public health, safety, and welfare

states cannot violate other consitutional provisions when using this power

*no federal power

53
Q

Congress has power to regulate and make excpetions to SCOTUS’ appellate jurisidction article III

A
54
Q

speech or debate clause

A

immunizes members of congress from criminal and civil liability for official legislative activities (speech given on House/Senate floor)

55
Q

indirect federal taxes comply with taxing and spending clause so long as they are

A

1) indentical in every state where taxed goods are located; and

2) reasonably related to revenue production

56
Q

power to tax and spend

A

congress has broad power to tax and spend for the general welfare

*congress can never impose taxes or exported goods or services and activities closely related to export process

57
Q

congress can use its taxing power

A

directly (on persons/real property) - so long as the tax is apportioned proportinately among the states and reasonably related to revenue production

indirectly (goods/transactions) - so long as the tax is indentical in every state and reasonably related to revenue production

58
Q

a plaintiff taxpayer has standing when suit…

A

1) challenges legislation enacted under congress’s taxing and spending power; and

2) alleges a violation of a specific constitutional limitation on that power (establishment clause)

59
Q

the historical test

A

allows the government to pass through first amendment establishment clause a wall separating church and state when the government action has historically been permitted in accordance with the organization meaning of the constitution

60
Q

US v. O’Brien

A

whether a law that regulates speech related conduct serves an interest within which the government regulator powers that’s important, substantial, and unrealted to suppression of expression and no greater than necessary to serve state’s interest

61
Q

a limited public forum is created…

A

when a government entity could close a location to speech but instead opens it to speech

62
Q

Discriminatory Impact Test

A

In Exxon the Court read the Hunt discriminatory-impact test to apply to a direct impact on out-of-state firms in the primary market (apples) regulated by the state.

63
Q

City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey

A

where the Court invalidated a NJ law prohibiting the disposal of out-of-state waste in New Jersey landfills, effectively precluding the export of waste disposal services and preferring in-state consumers.

The Court made clear that it does not matter whether the law has a legitimate environmental purpose; the state may not use discriminatory means to accomplish it. Insofar as the law is discriminatory, it is invalid unless it is narrowly tailored to meet a legitimate, nonprotectionist purpose.

64
Q

Doctrine of Ex parte Young

A

“Official-capacity actions [against state officials] for prospective relief are not treated as actions
against the State.” Thus, even when a damages claim against the state is barred under the
Eleventh Amendment, a suit against public officials in their official capacity seeking an
injunction may be maintained.

65
Q

5th amendment taking

A

a taking ocurs when the gov destorys private property or prop rights - including interests transferable by will or intetate succesion.

the gov may effectuate a taking only for a public use and must provide just compensation to the owner

66
Q

non-physical takings into three categories

A

1) a “total regulatory taking” (i.e., regulations that completely deprive an owner of all economically beneficial use of her property)

(2) “a Penn Central taking” (for which courts will consider several factors such as the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant, the extent to which the regulation has interfered with distinct investment-backed expectations, and whether it amounts to a physical invasion or instead merely affects property interests through some public program adjusting the benefits and burdens of economic life to promote the common good), and

(3) a “land-use exaction” (more specifically, a government demand that a landowner dedicate an easement allowing public access to her property as a condition of obtaining a development permit)

67
Q

In Loretto, SCOTUS held that a permanent phsyical occupation authorized by the gov is a taking…

A

without regard to the public interets that it may serve

the fact that the occupation will be by another entity does not change the analysis

68
Q

public purpose test for 5A taking

A

court ask deferentially only whether the municipality’s taking is rationally related to a conceivable public purpose.

court will recognize that the ‘public use’ requirement is contemporaneous with
the scope of a sovereign’s police powers.

scotus has held that a State may transfer property from one private party to another if future use by the public is the purpose of
the taking

69
Q

Free exercise of religion 1A

A

right to practice religion or no religion w/out government interference

70
Q

the free exercise clause allows the gov to question

A

whether a religious belief is sincerely held but not whether that belief is reasonable/true

71
Q

the political question doctrine prohibits federal courts from

A

adjudicating political questions

72
Q

a case presents a nonjusticiable political question when

A

the constitution has reserved decision making on an issue to the executive or legislative branch and/or

the matter is inherently not one that the judiciary can decide - ie, there is a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards to resolve this issue

73
Q

the taxing and spending clause grants congress extensive power to

A

appropraite federal funds

congress can then require that the pres and fed agencies spend the funds as explicily directed in a fed statute

74
Q

a federal officer is someone who

A

1) holds a continuing public office and,

2) has signficant discretionary authority to administer or enforce laws

supervised soley by the pres and must be appointed by the pres with the senate’s advice and consent

ex: supreme court justice, ambassador, cabinet official

75
Q

inferior federal officers are

A

appointed by the pres with senate approval unlesss congress delegates appointment to pres, fed courts, or heads of exec depts

supervised by princ fed officers

ex: independent counsel, judicial clerk, admin law judge

76
Q

state can tax fed gov affiliates (contractors) unless

A

1) congress granted the affiliate immunity,

2) the tax is discrimintaory, or

3) the tax substanitally interferes w/ the affiliate’s fed purpose or duties

77
Q

equal protection challenges are usually evaluted under

A

rational basis whic require challenger to prove that the discriminatory gov action has no rational relation to a legit gov interest

78
Q

fundamental rights

A

1A freedoms
Voting
Interstate travel
Privacy (marriage, parental rights, sexual acts, contraceptives)

FIRST VIP

79
Q

the gov cannot condition hiring a gov employee or contractor based on his political view or affiliates unless

A

these factors are required for effective job performance

80
Q

Article 5 priv and immunities clause

A

prohibits states from discriminating against out of state citizens by denying them a right of state citzenship unless

1) nonresidents cause or contribute to the problem that the state is attempting to solve, and

2) the discrimination bears a substantial realtionship to the state’s objective

81
Q

establishment clause - coercion test

A

gov cannot force particiaption in a religious exercise

school sponsored prayer in public schools viols establishment clause even when participatin is vol

82
Q

Youngstownframework is used to determine the extent of president’s authority to act by considering whether there was congressional:

A

authorization - in which case the pres had max authority to act and that act is likely valid

silence - in which case the act is valid so long as it (1) fell w/in pres’ article II powers, and (2) did not interfere w/another branch’s powers, or

opposition - in which case the pres had minimal authority to act and that act is likely invalid

83
Q

a law is content based if it

A

applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed or the idea the message expressed

84
Q

the political question doctrine bars action that require courts to resolve issue concering diplomatic recongnition of a foreign gov

A

courts have the power to determine interbranch dispputes involving foreign affairs when they concern the validity of a fed statute

85
Q

due process clause applies when a law impacts ___ persons, while the equal protection clause applies when the law impacts a ____ of persons

A

all; particular class

86
Q

quasi suspect classes

A

gender/sex, legitmiacy

get intermediate scrutiny - substanitally related to important gov interest

87
Q

necessary and proper clause allows congress to

A

take actions that are reasonably necessary to carry out its enumerated article 1 powers

88
Q

congress has the power to regulate and make exceptions to SCOTUS’ appellate juris under

A

article III

89
Q

when a public employee can only be fired for cause, due process generally requries that the employee recieve

A

1) notice of any alleged misconduct,

2) a pre-termination hearing to respond to the allegation, and

3) a post-termination evidentiary hearing to determine if the dismissal was warranted