Con Flashcards
ex post facto clauses
prohibit enactment of retroactive criminal laws that
criminalize previously legal conduct,
impose a greater punishment than previously prescribed,
eliminate previously available defenses,
decrease gov’s previous burden of proof
bill of attainder clauses
prohibit legisilation acts that inflict civil or criminal punishment against indentifiable persons (or groups of ppl) without a trial
to determine if congress can regulate an activity, courts consider whether
1) the activities are economic in nature (if so, a substantial effect is presumed),
2) the reg has a jurisidictional elements that limits its reach to activities w/ a direct connection to or effect on interstate commerce
3) there are express congressional findings concerning the activities’ effect on interestate commerce, and
4) there is a strong link between the regualted activity and that effect
nondelegation doctrine
prohibits congress from delegating purely legislative powers but allows congress to delegate its incidental powers (rulemaking, legisilative enforcement) if it provides an intelligble principle - ie, a clear statement defining
1) the policy congress seeks to advance
2) the agency to carry out that policy, and
3) the scope of that agency’s authority
level of scrutiny applies to content based law
strict scrutiny
gov show that it is necessary and narrowly tailored (least restrictive means) to achieve a compelling gov interest
very little over or under inclusivness is allowed
level of scrutiny applied to a content-neutral law
intermediate scrutiny
permissible so long as the gov can show that it is narrowly tailored to achieve an important gov interest and leaves open alternative channels of communication
narrowly tailored = challenged law would achieve gov’s interest lest effecively if it were less or under inclusive
TPM test is satisifed so long as the reg promotes a substantial gov interest that would be achieved less effectively absent the regulation and leave open ample channels of communication
Central Hudson test for gov regulation of commercial speech
1) speech must be lawful and not misleading,
2) statute must serve a substanital gov interest,
3) statute must directly advance that interest, and
4) the statute must be narrowly tailored
all race based classifications imposed by gov must surivive strict scrutiny which requires the gov to prove
that these classifications are necessary to achieve a compelling gov interest - eg, to remedy its own history of racial discrimination*
express preemption occurs when
a fed law is enacted under an exclusive fed power or explicitly bars state regulation
implied preemption occurs when
there is no room for state regulation (field),
it is nearly impossible to comply with both laws (direct conflict), or
the state law frustrates the fed law’s purpose (indirect conflict)
the _____ clause renders a state law void and without effect when a fed law expressly or impliedly preempts it
supremacy clause
scotus has discretion to exercise appellate jurisidction over state spreme court decisions that present a federal Q unless
those actions are based on adequate and independent state grounds
once scotus reslves fed Q, must remand case to state supreme court if any state issues remain
an exaction amounts to a 5th amend taking requiring just comepnsation unless government establishes
exaction exists when the gov enacts a reg that restricts the owners use of a property as a cond to allowing the owner to develop the land
these are taking under 5A unless gov can show a legit gov interest and rough proportionality (adverse impact of the proposed development is roughly proportional to the loss suffered by the property owner)
exaction occurs when
a local gov conditions the issuance of a building or developmnt permit on a landowners promise to dedicate part of the property for public use
severe (discriminatory) electorcal regulations are subjec to
strict scrutiny
ordinary (non-discriminatory) electoral regs are subject to
rational basis
gov’s regulation of protected commerical speech must
1) directly advance a substanital gov interest,
2) not be more extensive than necessary to serve that interest (satisifed if there’s a reasonable fit between the gov interest and the means chosen to achieve it)
1A protects the right of the press to
publish lawfully obtained, truthful information about matters of public signficance
1A doesnt shield press from generally applicable laws even if laws incidentially affect the press’s ability to gather and report the news
process for a treaty
approved by 2/3rd vote in senate (not house) before it can be ratified
then, treaty takes precedence over any conflicting state law pursuant to supremacy clause
Market participant exception
The state may discriminate in favor of residents when buying or selling goods and services because the state is acting as a “market participant” rather than as a regulator of an economic activity.
dormant commerce clause analysis
1) is the statute facially discriminatory?
2) if no, Q is whether it effectuates a legit local public interest and whether the burden if any is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits
3) if it is facially discrim then its invalid unless narrowly tailored to meet a legit purpose (less discrim means).
11th amend
bars private parties and foreign govs from suing a state in federal court without state’s consent
doesnt bar suits brought by US or another state
*doesnt apply to suits vs public officials in their official capacity seeking an injunction
a state may treat men and women differently consistent w/ equal protections and provide separate facilities for each gender if state can
1) demonstrate the exceedingly persusaive justification for the separate treatment, and
2) demonstrating that the sepratae facilities are subsntially equivalent
actions of private parties constitute state actions when
1) they have prformed a traditional public function,
2) there’s enforcement of certain private contracts;
3) there is joint action or entanglement between state and private actor; or
4) there’s state encouragement of private discrimination
analysis for 1A free speech viol
- state or private actor?
- if private actor, are they a state actor under public function standard?
- content based or content neutral reg?
a law regulating unprotected speech needs to pass
rational basis
incitment, fighting words, threats, obsecnity, false
SCOTUS has long held that public schools may not force their students to participate in
flag salute ceremony when it offends the political or religious beliefs of the students or their families
when expression takes place on gov owned property, gov regulation of expression is asserted under the
public forum doctrine.
public street and sidewalks = traditional public forum
when a state tries to reg expressive activity in a traditional public forum, it is prohibited from doing so based on the expressive acticity’s content unless
it survive strict scrutiny (narrowly tailored to achieve compelling gov interst)
SCOTUS has held that the gov’s interest in keeping streets clean is insufficent to ban leafletting in the public streets as the gov power to reg with incidental effects on public sidewalk speech is very limited
.
14th amendment equal protection
not state shall deny to any person within its jurisidction the equal protection of the law
suspect classes
race
religion
citizenship
national origin
a federa statue abrogates 11th amendment immunity if
1) statute unambigiously asserts that it does so; and
2) congress enacted the statute under a poewr that may abbrogate 11th amendment immunity
NY v. Garcia
congress may not commander the state to regulate private conduct
US v. VA
state laws that make classifications on basis of gender are uncosntitutional unless state can estalblish an exceedingly persuasive jusification for the classification
“exceedingly persussaive justificatin” servces important gov interest and doesnt rely upon outdated or overbroad generalizations and stereotypes
*case w/ separate men and women military schools