family Flashcards
Ansley- Marxist feminist
The family acts as a safety valve for capitalism. Instead of men directing their anger at the nature and organisation of capitalism itself through their experience of alienation, they are directing their anger at the family which leads to problems of domestic abuse and child abuse as men try to assert power over the family.
domestic abuse- Ansley
Instead of men directing their anger at the nature and organisation of capitalism itself through their experience of alienation, they are directing their anger at the family which leads to problems of domestic abuse and child abuse as men try to assert power over the family. “Women are the takers of shit”
Murray- domestic abuse perspective
Domestic violence only occurs in dysfunctional families. There are higher rates of DV in lower classes due to a lower moral standard
Giddens perspective on DV
Domestic violence is caused by the emotional intensity of family life. The nature of family life makes domestic violence quite common as family life is characterised by emotional intensity and personal intimacy. Increasing isolation of the nuclear family, increases the intensity and escalations to violence.
Dobash and Dobash view on DV
Domestic violence is evidence of the patriarchy and is caused by challenges to male authority. Linked to the crisis of masculinity as men do not know their place in society and strike out
Rutherford- ageing population
Rutherford argues that due to an ageing population, future governments are going to have problems in funding both pensions and the NHS. He argues that, as a result, people will be instructed by law to make contributions to the cost of the care of elderly relatives. This causes problems for society as it causes a significant burden of dependency.
Townsend- ageing population
Townsend argues that older people are perceived negatively through social construction as relying on benefits and services which may push them into poverty.
ageing population stats
2011- abolition of retirement age (many older people now continue to work past 65)
Ageing population is becoming more of an issue as the ONS estimates that by 2038 only 17.4% of the population will be under 16.
weber- family diversity (negative)
Weber views this negatively as he believes that modern societies have undergone rationalisation and disenchantment as people no longer believe in religion. This contributes to the nuclear family being under threat as it is no longer viewed as a sacred institution, which contributes to the rise of family diversity and cohabitation.
Rapoport and Rapoports- family diversity
Argues that family diversity is increasing. They identified a number of ways in which family life was diverse, in contrast to the idea that the nuclear family was the clear norm.
1) Organisational. This refers to the way a family might organise itself in terms of the roles people perform (e.g. traditional male-dominated families and more symmetrical ones).
2) Cultural. Families differ in terms of their beliefs and values.
3) Class. Much writing about the family assumes that family life as experienced in a middle-class family is the same for other social classes, but this is not the case.
4) Life course. Rapoport and Rapoport point out that we do not live in the same family structure, family set-up or type of household for the whole of our lives. We might be born into a traditional nuclear family. This might change later in our childhood (for example it might become a lone parent family and then a reconstituted family).
5) Cohort. There is also change over time and what is the norm, in terms of family life, for one generation, is not for the next.
Willmott and Young-symmetrical families
Willmott and Young argue that there has been a “march of progress” and now the family has become more symmetrical. Instead of segregated roles, the nuclear has moved to joint conjugal roles. Family life has become more shared and equal.
Engels Marxist
Monogamous families are a mechanism in which the ruling class pass on inequalities in wealth and power, generation by generation, through acting as a means to pass down land and power through legitimacy. Thus, the nuclear family benefits the bourgeoisie and not the proletariat.
Althusser Marxist
Althusser agrees as he argues that the role of the family is to promote capitalist ideology through socialisation and the transmission of capitalist values. According to Althusser, the family is a form of the ideological state apparatus which forms to serve capitalists through this function
Cooper Marxist
- the nuclear family acts as an ideological conditioning device as it functions to promote and ensure the reproduction and maintenance of capitalism. It does this in several ways: promoting consumption (keeps capitalism going) , providing a safe haven for workers, making us believe inequality and hierarchy are normal.
Greer- radical fem
- Argues that the family will always disadvantage women. She focuses on looking at the role of women as wives, daughters and mothers. Greer argues that these 3 roles that women undertake in the family are undervalued and patriarchal. Women are controlled within these roles and suffer from the traditional expectations placed in these roles in society. Women are subordinate to men in the household and therefore she sees the family as a key site of reproducing inequality and perpetuating wider inequalities in society.
Diane Feeley-
argues that the family is an authoritarian unit dominated the husband. The family has an “authoritarian ideology” which teaches passivity, not rebellion and children learn to submit to parental authority thereby learning to accept their place in the hierarchy of power and control in capitalist society. Can also be spoken about when talking about age hierarchy in childhood.
Sommerville
- Believes in a March of Progress view of the family. This means that they believe that the family is gradually changing for the better over time by becoming more democratic and equal. They argue that evidence shows that men are doing a greater share of domestic labour (childcare, housework), decision making is becoming more equal and that male and female children are being socialised into much more more similar manner with similar aspirations. To Sommerville, many feminists have failed to acknowledge progress for women such as the greater freedom to go into paid work, and the greater degree of choice over whether they marry or cohabit when and whether to have children, and which family type they would like to become a member of. The increased choice for women and the rise of the dual-earner household has helped create greater equality within relationships. However, many men do not take on their full share responsibilities and often these men can be “shown the door”.
Ann Oakley-hegemonic gender role socialistion
Her study on primary socialisation and the impact of the family om hegemonic gender role socialisati0n showed the impact that the processes of canalisation/manipulation has on forming gender roles.
Beck- postmodernism
Beck argues that the traditional, patriarchal nuclear family has been undermined by two trends:
1-Greater gender equality- has challenged male domination in all spheres of life. Women now expect equality both at work and in marriage.
2-Greater individualism- where peoples action are influenced more by calculations of their own self-interests than by a sense of obligation to others.
These trends have led to a rise in the negotiated family (do not conform to traditional norms but instead vary to the wishes and expectations of their members who decide what is best for them by discussion) partners now enter the relationship on an equal basis. According to Beck, the rise of the negotiated family is all part of the move to a postmodern risk society- because there is more individual freedom, postmodern society is more chaotic and uncertain than ever in human history, and people have now developed “risk consciousness” as people now have to weigh up the potential costs, benefits and potential risks of pursuing one course of action over another. - Beck argued that greater gender equality and greater individualism has lead to the negotiated family. Negotiated families do not conform to the traditional family norm but vary accordingly to the wishes and expectations of its members who decide what is best for them by discussion. According to Beck, men and women now enter into the relationship on an equal basis and this means we are more likely to see joint conjugal roles in the future.
Beck points out that divorce has increased because of individualisation. Increased conflict emerging from increased choice and uncertainty has lead to chaotic relationships and a high divorce rate.
Giddens-postmodernism
- Giddens argues that relationships in postmodern society have become ‘individualised’- basically people put themselves first in relationships and their partners second. Giddens argues that in postmodern society we are somewhat obsessed with ourselves and our own identities and relationships today have become part of each individuals process of self discovery- trying different relationships has become part of establishing who we are, rather about the relationship itself.
Giddens characterises the typical relationships today as the “pure relationship”, it exists solely to meet the partners needs and is likely to continue only so long as it succeeds. An upside of this is that couples are now free to define the relationship themselves rather than acting out roles that have been defined by law or tradition. A downside is that there are now significantly higher rates of relationship breakdown and serial monogamy.
Confluent love is a theory designed by Giddens which argues that individuals are now looking to create meaningful relationships based on love and respect. Giddens describes the most appropriate type of relationship in which fits in with a late modern society characterised by dual-careerism, near gender equality and the eroding of traditional norms of masculinity or femininity.
Believes that divorce has increased as the nature of marriage and intimate relationships has changed. States that plastic sexuality has increased which means that sex is now for pleasure and not for conceiving children. Marriage is now based on confluent love (love which is dependent upon partners benefitting from the relationship). If the partners are not fulfilled by the relationship, couples will no longer stay together out of a sense of duty and therefore divorce will increase.
Carol Smart- personal life
She rejects the assumptions of about the decline of family life that Giddens and Beck state. Instead, her approach focuses on the bonds between people, importance of cultural heritage, memory, significance of emotions. This means according to Smart, that families can include all types of relationships that individuals see as significant which gives them a sense of identity such as close friends and pets.
Dennis- functionalist
believes that because the family performs fewer functions in modern society, the bonds between men and women are weaker which causes an increase in divorce. (increase in divorce)
Goode functionalist
believes that conflict has increase in the family unit because the family has become more isolated from other kin, placing an increased burden on husbands and wives that have little support from other relatives. (increase in divorce)
Allan and Crow- diversity
They argue that there is now far greater diversity in peoples domestic arrangements with each family cycle being different. Each person follows an unpredictable family course. They state that diversity is based on increased choice in which people are now more able to exercise choice and personal volition over domestic and familial arrangements. Allan and Crow identify the following demographic changes contributing to increased diversity:
1-The divorce rate has risen.
2-Lone parent households have risen (due to divorce and pregnancy)
3-Cohabitation outside of marriage is increasingly common
4-Marriage rates have declined
5- Increase in the number of step-families
Causes of single parenthood- Allan and Crow believe trat the increase in lone parenthood is due to two factors: an increase in divorce and the increase in births to unmarried mothers. Allan and Crow argue that the trend towards increasingly single parents reflects an increasingly acceptance of diversity and individual choice. There is less stigma about being a single parent compared to in the 1960s when single mothers were outcast in society.