factors affecting eyewitness testimony: misleading info Flashcards

1
Q

who were the named researchers?

A

-Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what did Loftus and Palmer make pp’s do

A
  • watch a clip of a car crash
  • gave them questions about accident
  • asked how fast they believed cars were going when they (crashed, hit, bumped, collided)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were the findings of L and P’s research?

A
  • when asked leading questions found average speed changed
  • smashed= 40mph
  • contacted=32 mph
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why do leading questions effect EWT?

A
  • alters memory
  • second variation when they asked pp’s if they saw glass
  • pp’s who heard smashed were more likely to report they saw glass more those ho heard less violent verbs
  • THERE WAS NO GLASS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evaluate how research into leading questions is useful in real life?

A

STRENGTH

  • shows consequences of inaccurate EWT and leading questions
  • improves the way police and legal system may work
  • internal validity and can b generalised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluate a weakness of getting pp’s to watch a video?

A

WEAKNESS

  • artificial stimulus
  • clip is different to real life
  • cannot replicate levels of stress and emotions can influence memory
  • limited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain post event discussion

A
  • co witnesses to crime can discuss

- but testimonies may become contaminated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

who did research into post event discussion?

A

-Gabbert et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explain research into post event discussion?

A
  • split pp’s into pairs
  • got them to separately watch a video of the same crime but from different angles
  • some views were impaired for individuals
  • then they discussed what they saw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain finding from Gabbert et al’s research?

A
  • 71% mistakingly recalled aspects of event they had not seen in video but picked up in discussion
  • control group had 0% error
  • shows memory conformity (ISI/NSI)
  • often agree with each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluate how induvidual differences impact EWT?

A
  • found 18-25 and 35-45 were more accurate in recall than 55-75
  • however groups were more accurate within their age group (own age bias)
  • some groups may appear less accurate due to age but that may not be the factor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly