Factors affecting eye witness testimony - misleading information Flashcards
What is Eye Witness Testimony
Ability to recall events e.g. crimes/crashes
What is EWT accuracy affected by
Leading questions and post event discussion
Outline part 1 of Loftus and Palmers study
Investigates how leading questions affects EWT
45 American students divided into 5 groups
Video of car crash shown/question asked after
Verb in question was manipulated - smahed,collided,hit,bumped,contacted
Smashed verb had higher speed reports(41mph) than contacted(32)
Leading questions affect EWT
Outline part 2 of Loftus and Palmers study
Same aim
150 American students
3 groups
Car crash video shown/questionnaire given after about car speed
Control group not given questionnaire
P’s asked if they saw broken glass in the video 1 week later
32% who heard smashed before reported seeing glass
12% of control group reported seeing glass
Leading questions influence EWT
What is post event discussion
Witnesses discuss event, distorting info
Outline Gabberts study
Investigates effect of post event discussion on EWT
60 students/60 adults
Video of girl stealing money (different perspectives shown)
P’s tested individually then in groups
Questionnaire given after
71% of witnesses in group condition reported seeing theft when they didnt
60% said she was guilty
Post event discussion negatively affects EWT
Evaluate effect of misleading info on EWT
Real world application - Court system
Lab experiment - Loftus and Palmer - counter - artificial
Good methodology - Gabberts study used students+adults - high population validity
Nomothetic vs ideographic