Factors affecting accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Misleading information Flashcards

1
Q

What is misleading information research?

A

Research focused on how leading questions can influence eyewitness testimony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are leading questions?

A

Questions that suggest a particular answer, potentially biasing the response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who conducted the study on misleading questions in 1974?

A

Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure in Loftus and Palmer’s experiment?

A

Participants watched video clips of accidents and were asked questions about them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the critical question asked in the Loftus and Palmer experiment?

A

About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What verbs were used in the critical question of the Loftus and Palmer study?

A
  • hit
  • contacted
  • bumped
  • collided
  • smashed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the mean estimated speeds for the verbs ‘contacted’ and ‘smashed’?

A
  • contacted: 31.8 mph
  • smashed: 40.5 mph
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the response-bias explanation?

A

It suggests that the wording of a question influences how participants decide to answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the substitution explanation propose?

A

The wording of a leading question changes the participant’s memory of the event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was a key finding in Loftus and Palmer’s second experiment?

A

Participants who heard ‘smashed’ were more likely to report seeing broken glass.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is post-event discussion (PED)?

A

When eyewitnesses discuss their experiences and memories after an event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who studied the effects of post-event discussion in 2003?

A

Fiona Gabbert et al.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the procedure in Gabbert et al.’s experiment?

A

Participants watched videos of the same crime from different viewpoints and discussed what they saw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What percentage of participants in Gabbert et al.’s study mistakenly recalled aspects they did not see?

A

71%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the corresponding figure in the control group with no discussion?

A

0%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is memory conformity?

A

When witnesses align their memories with others, often to gain social approval.

17
Q

What is memory contamination?

A

When co-witnesses’ memories are altered or distorted due to discussions with each other.

18
Q

Fill in the blank: The critical verb __________ altered the participants’ memory of the incident.

A

[leading question]

19
Q

True or False: Memory conformity implies that the actual memory of the event is unchanged.

20
Q

Strengths of misleading questions

A

Real word application- Important practical uses in the criminal justice system as policed trained to not ask misleading questions + psychologists asked to explain misleading dueing court trials

21
Q

Weakness

A

The research lacks external validity as in Loftus and Palmers study participants were asked to watch a video of a car crash instead of experiencing an actual crash. Factors like emotions may effect the results