Explanations for forgetting: retrieval failure theory Flashcards
Retrieval failure theory
└don’t have necessary cues to access memory
└memory is available but not accessible without the right cues
└cue= trigger of information allows us to access memories
└meaningful/indirectly linked by being encoded at the time of learning
└external (situation) or internal (mood e.g.)
Encoding specificity principle (ESP)
Person
Tulving (1983)
Encoding specificity principle (ESP)
└Tulving (1983)
└if a cue is to help us recall information it has to be present at encoding and retrieval- if cues absent= forgetting
└mnemonic cues
Types of retrieval failure
- Context-dependent forgetting
- State-dependent forgetting
Context-dependent forgetting study
Person
Godden and Baddely (1975)
Context-dependent forgetting study
└Godden and Baddely (1975) P: └learn/recall lists of words on land/underwater F: └matching conditions: best └not matching conditions: 40% lower └due to different external queues
State-dependent forgetting
Person
Crater and Cassaday (1998)
State-dependent forgetting
└Crater and Cassaday (1998) P: └antihistamine/mild sedative └learn/recall list of words on/off drug F: └matching conditions: best └not matching conditions: lower └due to different internal queues
Retrieval failure theory
Strengths
Supporting evidence
└large range of supporting research evidence
└Godden and Baddely (1975), Crater and Cassaday (1998)
└Michael Eysenck (2010) argues retrieval failure is main reason for forgetting in from LTM
└increases validity
└research both in controlled labs and real life situations
Retrieval failure theory
Limitations
Summary
- Questioning context effects: Baddely (1997)
- Recall versus recognition: Baddely (1980)
Retrieval failure theory
Limitations
Questioning context effects
└Baddely (1997)
└context effects aren’t strong, especially in real life
└environments generally aren’t different enough
└real life applications of retrieval failure due to contextual cues don’t actually explain much forgetting
Retrieval failure theory
Limitations
Recall versus recognition
└Baddely (1980)
└replicated their underwater experiment but used recognition test instead of recall
└no context dependent effect, same results in all conditions
└presence of cues only effects memory when it is tested in a certain way