Explanations for forgetting: interference Flashcards

1
Q

What is interference?

A

Forgetting because one memory blocks another causing one or both memories to be distorted or forgotten

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interference is an explanation for forgetting in …

A

the LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why does forgetting in the LTM occur?

A

-Can’t get access to information, even though they are available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two types of interference?

A

proactive & retroactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

old memories interfere with new memories
e.g. learning a new language and constantly slipping back into native language
e.g. calling your new bf your old bf name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is retroactive interference?

A

new memories interfere with old memories
e.g. forgot old phone number as new number has replaced
e.g. memory of new car registration number prevents recall of previous car registration number

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who did research on the effects of similarity of information?

A

McGeoch & McDonald

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was McGeoch & McDonald’s hypothesis?

A

In PI & RI , the interference is worse when memories (learning) are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was McGeoch & McDonald’s procedure?

A

-studied RI by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of materials
P’s had to learn list of 10 words that they could recall with 100& accuracy
- They then learnt a new word list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How were the groups split in McGeoch and McDonalds study?

A

-six groups of P’s
- Group 1-synonyms (words with same meanings as originals)
- Group 2 -antonyms (words with opposite meanings to originals)
- Group 3- words unrelated to original ones
- Group 4- consonant syllables
- Group 5- three digit numbers
-Group 6- no new list (rested) -control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were McGeoch & McDonalds findings and conclusions?

A

-When P’s asked to recall original list of words the most similar material (synonyms) produced the worse recall
-This shows interference is stronger when the memories are similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explanation for the effects of similarity

A

-either proactive interference or retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What evidence is there to support effects of interference?

A

-Baddeley & Hitch asked rugby players to recall names of teams they had played during the season
-number of intervening games varied because some missed matches due to injury
-players who played the most games had the poorest recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the counterpoint against the real- world effects of interference?

A

-interference may cause some forgetting but it is unusual
-conditions necessary for interference to occur are rare
-e.g. two memories similar for interference to occur - happens occasionally
-can be better explained by retrieval failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain interference & cues evaluation point

A

-interference is temporary & can be overcome by cues
-Tulving & Potska - P’s gave list of words organised into categories (don’t know categories)
-recall=70% for first list but became worse as P learnt new list (PI)
-at end p’s given cue recall test
-recall rose back to 70%
-interference causes temporary loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What support is there from drug studies?

A

-evidence of retrograde facilitation
-Researchers gave P’s list of words and later asked them to recall list assuming the intervening experiences would act as interference
-when list of words was learn under influence -recall =poor than Placebo
When list learned before drug was take- recall better than placebo
-drug facilitated recall of material
-drug prevents new info interfering retroactively with info already stored