Explanations for Forgetting Flashcards

1
Q

2 types of forgetting

A

interference
retrieval failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 types of interference

A

proactive and retroactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

proactive interference

A

old memories prevents formation or recall of new memories smilar to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

retroactive interference

A

new info disrupts recall of older memories associated with or similar to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

McGeoch and McDonald studied…

A

…effect of similarity of learned material on retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

McGeoch and McDonald

A
  • P’s learned list of 10 adjectives to 100% accuracy of recall
  • then learned another list of 10 words, ranging from synonyms of first to numbers
  • tested on original list
  • if 2nd ist synonyms, did worst
  • if numbers, did best
  • shows retroactive interference increases with similar memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tulving and Psotka studied…

A

…whther interference is temporary and can be overcome by cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

tulving and Psotka

A
  • gave P’s lists of words organised into categories, 1 list at a time and asked to recall them
  • recall avg of 70% for 1st list, getting worse with each list
  • then given a recall test and told the categories.
  • recall increased to 70% again
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Baddeley and Hitch investigated…

A

interference in everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Baddeley and Hitch

A
  • had rugby players recall names of teams they’d played against that season
  • found recall better for those who’d missed 1 or 2 games than those who’d not
  • suggests interference reason ore regular players did worse as more info that can interfere with recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Tulving and Psotka showed…

A

limitation of interference as shows only temp loss of access to info in LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluation of McGeoch and McDonald

A
  • type of expt replicated many times
  • used word list more relevant to everyday life than trigrams, but not as realistic as names/faces
  • doesn’t sho how interference affects episodic memory or memories of faces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

potential CV’s of Baddeley and Hitch

A
  • similarity of team names
  • individual differences in memory of players
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

retrieval failure

A

info can’t be recalled because don’t havee suffient cues to enable retrieval from LTM, despite info stored and therefore available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explanations of forgetting evaluation

A

similar categories tackle context of sedation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cues

A

triggers, often coded at the time of learning, which allow us to access info
can be internal or external

17
Q

e.g of internal cue

18
Q

e.g. of external cue

A

physical location

19
Q

encoding specificity principle

A

suggest cues must be present at the time of learning (encoding) and at time of retrieval (recall) if they are to help us recall

20
Q

context dependent forgetting

A

recall depends on external cues
if environment of recall different to taht of encoding, we are unable to recall

21
Q

state dependnt forgetting

A

recall depends on internal cues

22
Q

summary of Godden and Baddeley

A
  • had 1 group of divers learn words on land and another group learn them under water
  • had 1/2 of each group recall words on land and other 1/2 underwater
  • those who learned and were tested in same environment recalled 40% more words than those who’d done so in different environments
23
Q

explain the findings of Godden ad Baddeley

A

the external cues (environment) when learning the words were different to those present at recall, so led to retrieval failure

24
Q

summarise Carter and Cassaday

A
  • 1 group learned words after taking a sedative and another group without the sedative
  • 1/2 of each group tested, either with or without sedative
  • those who were tested in different state to learned did significantly worse than those who were tested in the same state
25
Carter and Cassaday conclusion
when interal cues present at learning but absent at recall, we are more likely to forget
26
how does the cognitive interview support retrieval failure
the success of the cognitive interview , which recreates the context of learning to help witnesses recall as much as possible supports the importance of context dependent forgetting
27
who suggested the encoding specificity principle?
Tulving