Explanations for Forgetting Flashcards

1
Q

2 types of forgetting

A

interference
retrieval failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 types of interference

A

proactive and retroactive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

proactive interference

A

old memories prevents formation or recall of new memories smilar to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

retroactive interference

A

new info disrupts recall of older memories associated with or similar to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

McGeoch and McDonald studied…

A

…effect of similarity of learned material on retroactive interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

McGeoch and McDonald

A
  • P’s learned list of 10 adjectives to 100% accuracy of recall
  • then learned another list of 10 words, ranging from synonyms of first to numbers
  • tested on original list
  • if 2nd ist synonyms, did worst
  • if numbers, did best
  • shows retroactive interference increases with similar memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tulving and Psotka studied…

A

…whther interference is temporary and can be overcome by cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

tulving and Psotka

A
  • gave P’s lists of words organised into categories, 1 list at a time and asked to recall them
  • recall avg of 70% for 1st list, getting worse with each list
  • then given a recall test and told the categories.
  • recall increased to 70% again
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Baddeley and Hitch investigated…

A

interference in everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Baddeley and Hitch

A
  • had rugby players recall names of teams they’d played against that season
  • found recall better for those who’d missed 1 or 2 games than those who’d not
  • suggests interference reason ore regular players did worse as more info that can interfere with recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Tulving and Psotka showed…

A

limitation of interference as shows only temp loss of access to info in LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluation of McGeoch and McDonald

A
  • type of expt replicated many times
  • used word list more relevant to everyday life than trigrams, but not as realistic as names/faces
  • doesn’t sho how interference affects episodic memory or memories of faces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

potential CV’s of Baddeley and Hitch

A
  • similarity of team names
  • individual differences in memory of players
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

retrieval failure

A

info can’t be recalled because don’t havee suffient cues to enable retrieval from LTM, despite info stored and therefore available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explanations of forgetting evaluation

A

similar categories tackle context of sedation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

cues

A

triggers, often coded at the time of learning, which allow us to access info
can be internal or external

17
Q

e.g of internal cue

A

mood

18
Q

e.g. of external cue

A

physical location

19
Q

encoding specificity principle

A

suggest cues must be present at the time of learning (encoding) and at time of retrieval (recall) if they are to help us recall

20
Q

context dependent forgetting

A

recall depends on external cues
if environment of recall different to taht of encoding, we are unable to recall

21
Q

state dependnt forgetting

A

recall depends on internal cues

22
Q

summary of Godden and Baddeley

A
  • had 1 group of divers learn words on land and another group learn them under water
  • had 1/2 of each group recall words on land and other 1/2 underwater
  • those who learned and were tested in same environment recalled 40% more words than those who’d done so in different environments
23
Q

explain the findings of Godden ad Baddeley

A

the external cues (environment) when learning the words were different to those present at recall, so led to retrieval failure

24
Q

summarise Carter and Cassaday

A
  • 1 group learned words after taking a sedative and another group without the sedative
  • 1/2 of each group tested, either with or without sedative
  • those who were tested in different state to learned did significantly worse than those who were tested in the same state
25
Q

Carter and Cassaday conclusion

A

when interal cues present at learning but absent at recall, we are more likely to forget

26
Q

how does the cognitive interview support retrieval failure

A

the success of the cognitive interview , which recreates the context of learning to help witnesses recall as much as possible supports the importance of context dependent forgetting

27
Q

who suggested the encoding specificity principle?

A

Tulving