Explanations for Forgetting Flashcards

1
Q

What is forgetting?

A

An inability to recall information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the interference theory of forgetting?

A

When long-term memory becomes confused with or disputed by other information during coding causing inaccurate recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does interference theory suggests about why we forget?

A

We forget because the two types of information are similar to each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 2 types of interferences in the interference theory?

A

Proactive and Retroactive information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

You cannot learn a new task or piece of info because of an old one. What we already know is interfering with what we are currently learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an example of proactive interference?

A

We forget our new boyfriend’s name because the name of our old boyfriend interferes with it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is retroactive interference?

A

You forget a previously learnt task or piece of info, due to the learning of a new one. Later learning interferes with earlier learnt memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is an example of retroactive interference?

A

We can’t remember our old address because we have moved to a new house.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What research supports the interference theory?

A

Schmidtt et al (2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the aim of Schmidtt et al. (2002)?

A

To find out whether interference could be shown in real world scenario.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the sample used in Schmidtt et al. (2002)?

A

700 participants randomly selected from a Dutch elementary school.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the method of Schmidtt et al. (2002)?

A

All sent a questionnaire.
211 responded 11-79yrs to identify as many street names on the map area they went to school.
Retroactive interference assessed on no. of times they moved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the findings of Schmidtt et al. (2002)?

A

Positive association between number of times they had moved house and number of street names forgotten.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the conclusion of Schmidtt et al. (2002)?

A

Learning new patterns of street names when moving house is harder to recall old ones. Retroactive interference does seem to explain forgetting in some real life situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

There is evidence from lab experiments to support the interference theory. What evidence is there to support this?

A

Postman found that participants were more accurate at recalling a list of words if they didn’t have to also learn a second word list.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

There is evidence from lab experiments to support the interference theory. How can this be evaluated?

A

Suggests that interference theory holds validity.
However, studies like this have received criticism for, being artificial and therefore not representing real life memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Baddeley (1990) has criticised the studies used to support the interference theory for being artificial. What evidence is there to support this?

A

He suggested that the subjects are often the tasks to close to each other which doesn’t tend to happen in real life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Baddeley (1990) has criticised the studies used to support the interference theory for being artificial. How can this be evaluated?

A

Reduces external validity as suggests it cannot be applied to real life explanations of forgetting.
However, research conducted by Schmidt has minimized extraneous variables suggesting interference does occur like this in real life.

19
Q

Another problem with the interference theory is it is not a full explanation for forgetting. What evidence is there to support this?

A

The theory only accounts for forgetting when information is similar, suggesting it cannot be the only reason.

20
Q

Another problem with the interference theory is it is not a full explanation for forgetting. How can this be evaluated?

A

We should be careful when applying the theory of forgetting as it may be more complicated than the theory suggests.

21
Q

What is the cue dependent forgetting theory?

A

States that forgetting occurs when there is not enough information or ‘cues’

22
Q

What are the 2 types of cue dependent forgetting?

A

Context-Dependent failure
State-dependent failure

23
Q

What is context-dependent failure?

A

Forgetting occurring when the external environment is different to the one you learnt it in. It is about external retrevial cues.

24
Q

What is an example of context-dependent failure?

A

Getting fewer marks in a test that you took in a different room to the one you learnt the info in.

25
Q

What is state-dependent failure?

A

Forgetting occurring when the internal cues are dissimilar at recall compared to encoding. It is about internal retreival cues and can include emotions.

26
Q

What is an example of state-dependent failure?

A

Trying to recall a stressful event when you are happy is difficult.

27
Q

What study supports context-dependent failure?

A

Godden and Baddeley

28
Q

What was the sample of Godden and Baddeley study?

A

Asked 18 deep sea divers to memorize a list of 36 unrelated words of 2/3 syllables.

29
Q

What was the method used by Godden and Baddeley?

A

One group on the beach and one group under water.
When asked to remember 1/2 of the beach learners remained there the rest recalled underwater.

30
Q

What were the findings of Godden and Baddeley?

A

Participants were more likely to forgot the words of they learnt it in a different place to where they recalled it.

31
Q

What study supports state-dependent failure?

A

Overton

32
Q

What was the sample used by Overton?

A

Asked 48 medical students to remember a list of words when drunk or sober.

33
Q

What was the methods used by Overton?

A

Participants had to recall the list 24 hours later, wither in the same state or another.

34
Q

What were the findings of Overton?

A

Participants more likely to forget when they were in a different state to what they learnt the words.

35
Q

What is the encoding specificity principle?

A

Recall depends upon accessing information by remembering the retrieval cue under which the information is stored.

36
Q

What is the effectiveness of a retrieval cue dependent on?

A

How overloaded it is.

37
Q

The more deeply processed and relevant the cue is to the information the..?

A

More likely you are to remember it.

38
Q

One weakness of context-dependent failure is that Baddeley admitted that context effects are not actually very strong in real life. What evidence is there to support this claim?

A

The difference between a classroom and an exam hall is very minor as they both have desks, chairs etc. Therefore, these are similar cues.

39
Q

One weakness of context-dependent failure is that Baddeley admitted that context effects are not actually very strong in real life. How can this be evaluated?

A

Suggests that context-dependent forgetting might not be relevant to everyday life as first thought. Reducing external validity.

40
Q

There are practical applications for the theory. What evidence is there to support this?

A

Theory suggests that having the right cues helps recall info, so association of key pieces of revision to external cues will aid recall. Used to support police interviews recall of eye witness.

41
Q

There are practical applications for the theory. How can this be evaluated?

A

Useful as suggests that cue-dependent forgetting has a basis in the real world and worth understanding and researching. Benefits society and justifying funding for further research.

42
Q

Much of the research conducted into cue-dependent forgetting relies on lab experiments. What evidence is there to support this?

A

Godden and Baddeley where the stimuli are word lists with no meaning. We are likely to encode it differently to real life.

43
Q

Much of the research conducted into cue-dependent forgetting relies on lab experiments. How can this be evaluated?

A

Cannot use these studies as justification for forgetting in the real world as the studies have low external validity.