Explain the effect of triangulation on the credibility/trustworthiness of qualitative research Flashcards
Explain the effect of triangulation on the credibility/ trustworthiness of qualitative research: Triangulation
- triangulation = different ways of doing the same thing
= a truer picture of phenomenon
= increase credibility/trustworthiness of conclusions
Explain the effect of triangulation on the credibility/ trustworthiness of qualitative research: Credibility
- evaluation of whether research findings represent a credible (true) interpretation of the participants original data
How to and effect of: Method triangulation (2+2)
how:
-use different methods in the same study (e.g. observation and interview)
- qualitative and quantitative can complement each other
effect of:
-bias is reduced and credibility increased
-several methods = takes adv of different strengths of each method and compensates for limitations
How to and effect of: Data triangulation (1+2)
how:
-comparison of data from multiple sources (e.g. observation from diff days)
effect of:
- claims based on more data = bias is reduced and credibility increased
-provides additional source = better qual of data
How to and effect of: Researcher triangulation (1+2)
how:
-use different researchers to collect/analyse data
effect of:
-bias is reduced and credibility increased
-particularly effective to counteract researcher bias bc interpretations discussed/ alternative interpretations offered
How to and effect of: Theory triangulation (1+4)
how:
-use of several competing theories to analyse data
effect of:
-protect against researcher bias hence increasing credibility
-eg. could reveal contradictions in data thus
-eg. researcher forced to justify why they consider a particular theory to be relevant in explaining phenomena under research
-promotes deeper understanding of topic
-therefore bias is reduced and credibility increased
Triangulation conclusion:
not always guaranteed to increase credibility
- decisions made by researchers about how to triangulate can be systematically biased
- this would mean conclusions based on research using triangulation are not credible but have illusion of credibility
- researchers therefore need to be clear on their motivations and biases
- combine with qualitative
- additionally, qual methodology assumes data obtained from any single gathering procedure are representative only of that single event
Explain the effect of triangulation on the credibility/trustworthiness of qualitative research
Explain: detailed account + reasons and causes
Triangulation
Credibility
How to and effect of:
- Theory triangulation
- Researcher triangulation
- Data triangulation
- Method triangulation
Conclusion