Exercise and Depression in the General Population Flashcards
cross-section studies
- > cross-sectional (observational) study compares different population groups at a single point in time
- > yoshiuchi et al., 2006 showed that daily step count and daily duration of moderate intensity PA were significantly and inversely correlated with depression
- > physical activity goes up, depression symptoms go down
longitudinal studies
- > longitudinal study researchers conduct several observations of the same subjects over a period of time
- > paffenbarger et al. (1994)
- > participants were split into 1 of 3 weekly energy expenditure (EE) categories, <1000, 1000-2499, 25000+ kcal/week
- > those with the highest weekly EE were 28% less likely to develop depression than the lowest weekly EE group
- > those with moderate weekly EE were 17% less likely to develop depression than the lowest weekly EE group
effects of exercise training on older patients with major depression (blumenthal et al.)
background: exercise training may reduce depressive symptoms in older patients with major depressive disorder (MDD)
objective: to asses the effectiveness of an aerobic exercise program compared to standard medication (antidepressants)
methods: 156 men & women with MDD randomly assigned to exercise, antidepressant medication or combined exercise and medication
treatment period: 16 weeks
primary outcome: better scores of Hamliton Depression Scale and Beck Depression Inventory
secondary outcome: aerobic capacity, life satisfaction, self-esteem, anxiety and dysfunctional cognitions
conclusion of exercise training and major depressive disorder
- > an exercise training program may be considered an alternative to antidepressants for treatment of depression in older persons
- > after 16 weeks of treatment, exercise was equally effective in reducing depression among patients with MDD
statistically significant change
=> usually focus on statistical significance to discuss effectiveness of an intervention, meaning the change is likely not by chance. however, this does not necessarily mean that it is clinically important
=> Centre for Epidemiological Studies - Depression (CES-D)
= or > means at risk for depression
=> statistical significance would be comparing the mean of two groups and seeing if there is a difference
=> this does not mean their score improved clinically
prenatal depression
- > affects up to 20% of all pregnancies
- > 19% will continue to have depressive symptoms postpartum
- > can negatively impact growing fetus: preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, early cessation of breastfeeding
prenatal depression treatment options
=> pharmacological treatment options are often avoided
=> most women go untreated
=> recent literature has shown that exercise may prevent prenatal depression
clinically reliable change criteria
reliability: if measures were repeated in the same population you would see the same results
clinically important: practical importance of the treatment effect being observed
purpose and method of physical activity and prenatal depression study
purpose: to determine if prenatal exercise during pregnancy can treat depression among women who enter pregnancy at risk for depression and if exercise can have a clinically reliable change on depression risk during pregnancy
method: randomized controlled trial: exercise group and standard care control group
group fitness class 3 / per week
aerobic training and resistance exercises
baseline: 9-12 weeks
completion 36-38 weeks
at baseline and at the end, completed the CES-D
calculating the clinically reliable change criteria
- the reliability of the measurement (Cronbach’s alpha) (0.752)
- standard deviation for the current population
- standard error of difference between scores at 2 time points (3.6)
- gives clinically reliable change criteria (7.09 -> 7 - how many of the treatment patients reduced the depression symptom on the CES-D by atleast 7 points)
results of exercise and prenatal depression study
- 61 women included (36 exercise, 25 control)
- assessed potential confounding variables: age, pre-pregnancy BMI, smoking status, education level, occupation, previous miscarriage incidence, parity, weight gain
- no difference observed from intervention and control groups
- >7 point decrease in CES-D scores and below 16, control reduced score by 3 points
- 22 women (61%) had a score decrease by 7 points in the EG compared to 8 women (32%) had a score decrease by 7 points in the CG (chi square p<0.05)
findings on prenatal exercise and depression
- prenatal exercise may have both a statistical and clinically reliable treatment effect on depression risk
- prenatal exercise may be prescribed to treat women who enter pregnancy with depression risk
- exercise can increase the likelihood of achieving the clinically reliable threshold
strengths and limitations of prenatal exercise and depression
strengths
- first study to calculate and apply clinically reliable change criteria for this population; calculation can be used for other outcomes
- only included women with a CES-D score greater or equal to 16
limitations
- convenience sample used
- group dynamics not assessed
future steps for prenatal exercise and depression studies
- design a prenatal exercise intervention based study with an priori sample size calculation specifically for women at risk for prenatal depression
- follow up in the postpartum period
by providing clinical evidence for prenatal exercise and depression
- inclusion of prenatal care
- treatment option
- support women and the next generation in leading a healthy lifestyle