Exam Questions Flashcards
Briefly describe one role of the unconscious according to the psychodynamic approach (2).
- The unconscious protects the conscious self from anxiety/fear/trauma/conflict
- Defence mechanisms e.g. repression, denial, displacement are used unconsciously to reduce anxiety
Outline what is meant by congruence. Explain one way in which Dominic might achieve congruence. (4)
- Congruence is the when there is similarity between a persons perceived self (how you see yourself) and ideal self (the self you would like to be)
- Dominic needs to close the gap between his perceived and ideal self
- Gap can be reduced or closed if he develops a more healthy view of himself or has a more achievable + realistic ideal self + unconditional positive regard from his therapist could be one strategy
Explain 1 limitation of assessing sleep quality using a rating scale of 1-10. (2)
- Sleep quality is subjective so might be interpreted differently by each student
- A rating of 3 for example might mean something diff for diff students
- Students are not able to explain their rating
What is meant by the term meta-analysis ? (2)
- Meta analysis is the process where researchers collect + collate a wide range of previously conducted research on a specific area
- Collated research is reviewed together
- Combined data/effect size is often statistically tested to provide an overall correlation
Give one reason why it is important for scientific reports to include a referencing section (1) ?
- To give credit to other researchers + acknowledge their ideas
- To avoid plagiarism
Explain what is means for a test to have high concurrent validity (2)?
- High CV is where there is close agreement between the data produced by the new test compared to the established test
- Close agreement is indicated if the correlation between the two sets of data produced by the tests exceeds +0.8
Explain why a histogram would not be an appropriate way of displaying the means shown (2).
- You need to have continuous data to draw a histogram
- The data represents 2 separate conditions (categorical)
Describe the process and purpose of peer review (6).
- Other psychologists check the research report before deciding whether it can be published
- Work is considered in terms of its validity, significance and originality
- Assessment of the appropriateness of the methods + designs used
- Editor makes the final decision whether to accept or reject the research report based on the reviewers comments
- Research proposals are submitted to panel and assessed for merit
- To ensure quality + relevance of research
- To ensure accuracy of findings
Explain how using the standard deviation rather than the range in this situation would improve the study (3).
- This would be an improvement because the SD is a measure of dispersion that was less easily distorted by a single extreme scale
- Takes account of all data values
- Not just the difference between the highest data value + lowest data value
What is meant by the results were significant at p<0.05 ?
This means that there is a less than 5% likelihood that this difference would occur if there is not real difference between the conditions (difference due to chance or something other than IV)
Briefly explain one reason why it is important for research to undergo a peer review process (2).
- Prevents publication of irrelevant findings + deliberate fraud and improves the quality of research
Briefly explain one reason why it is important for research to be replicated (2).
Effects that occur in a study are more likely to be reliable if they occur in a repeat of the study + replication therefore increases reliability
Explain how this content analysis could have been conducted (4).
- Identify/devise important categories/themes (from the interview)
- E.g. of possible category/theme (e.g. references to aggressive interactions)
- Work through transcribed conversations / repeatedly listen to segments of the recording
- Count/tally the no. of occurrences of each of the categories / themes
Explain how the reliability of the content analysis could be assessed (test-retest reliability). (4)
- Content analysis repeated on a second occasion using the same interview data
- Compare the results of the 2 separate analysis (no of occurrences of each)
- Researchers could calculate the correlation between the 2 ratings
- Researchers generally accept 0.8 correlation between the test + retest
Explain how the reliability of the content analysis could be assessed (inter-rater reliability). (4)
- Use a second person to work with original researcher
- They could read the interviews separately + devise a set of categories
- They could tally the occurrences of each categories of the interviews separately
- Calculate the correlation between the 2 ratings
- Researchers generally accept 0.8 correlation between the test + retest