Exam Law and State Flashcards
Four approaches to law
- Linguistic approach (two basic types of legal language: language of legal texts and legal practice, legal science (clear full statements and specific definitions))
- Axiological approach (law as an expression of values)
- Sociological approach (acts of social agents, social relations, and social institutions)
- Psychological approach (in human being’s minds)
also economical and political
The legal norm
is the rule of conduct (поведінка) that is reconstructed from texts of binding (зобов’язуючих) legal instruments.
The legal system
is organized, and internally coherent (послідовна) collection of such norms created by a political authority, that is a legislator, and contained in legal texts issued by this legislator.
Legal order
multi-layered phenomenon which contains extra-textual, not-written rules and principles.
Three levels of law
- Surface level
- Legal culture level
- Deep legal culture level
Surface level of law
the most obvious but the most unstable
Surface level – is level of legal provisions formulated in law-making instruments and other typical sources of law.
(creation)
Legal Culture level of law
not only produced by the acts of legislator, but also is created by legal practice and legal scholarship.
На відміну від поверхневого рівня, правова культура продукується не лише актами законодавця, але й створюється юридичною практикою та юридичною наукою.
o methodical elements (argumentation)
o conceptual elements (basic legal concepts)
o normative elements (general legal principles)
o general doctrine (more comprehensive doctrine)
Contains:
- Values
- Principals
- Concepts
Deep legal culture level
level that is built by the most basic qualities of the law and the way that it is perceived.
e.g., the idea of human rights protection – may be included into the deep culture of law.
Four types of law by Thomas Aquinas
The Eternal – God’s plan for the universe
The Natural – discoverable by reason and is to be found in human minds
The Human – is made by human on basis of natural reason
The Divine – the law revealed in scripture
What is law? Four possible answers
Common law
Natural law
Positivism
Realism
Legal positivism
Legal systems are created by people rather than having some natural or metaphysical existence.
Only valid laws are those written rules, regulations, principles that have been expressly enacted, adopted, or recognized by the official political authority.
The laws are seen to be completely separated from moral norms and ethical values.
Legal norms are binding and enforceable by the force, by the police power of government.
Separability thesis: law and morality are conceptually distinct.
Natural law
All laws must to be informed by or made to comply with universal principles of morality, religion, and justice.
Legal realism
Is a philosophical conception of law which states that we should look for legal norms in judicial decisions and other acts of applying law. Law is neither based on some formal acts nor on some universal authority.
Legal realists often hold the view that law is nothing more than what a particular court says on particular day and the decision will vary according to the political, religious, cultural persuasion of the judge.
Legal realists share belief in the importance of interdisciplinary while approaching to law. Many proponents are interested in anthropological and sociological insights in the study of law.
Legal instrumentalism
Law should be used as a tool to achieve social purposes and to balance competing social interests.
Types of norms
Abstract and concrete
General and individual
Ius cogens and ius dispositivum
Rules and principles
Policies
General and Individual types of norms
The division is based on a way of describing the addressee. The addressee can be indicated as a part of the group (distinguished by some general attributes) or as a particular entity (distinguished using personal, unique features).
In general norms an addressee can be described using the criterion of profession, social role, or role in social relation. The norm is general even if only one person can be characterised by such general qualities.
In individual norms an addressee can be described using for example: name, national identification number, Tax identification number.
Abstract and Concrete types of norms
The division is based on a manner of describing a legal obligation.
The norm is abstract if the type of conduct is described in repeatable way, using non-contextual designation.
The norm is concrete if the criteria of norm’s applicability is specified as a particular situation.
Ius cogens and Ius dispositivum
The division is based on scope of latitude in applying and modifying a particular norm by its addressees.
Ius cogens (peremptory norm) means that the norm must be strictly applied. It is a characteristic of public law.
Ius dispositivum means that norms are relatively applied rules. It is a characteristic of private law.
Principles and Rules
Principles are valid because of the material significance. They are accepted and applied generally by lawyers. Their scope of application is imprecise; it depends on a wider context. For these reasons they need to be applied in a ‘more or less’ mode.
Principle:
* Normative sense – principles are legal norms formulated in legal texts. These are norms of special importance for the whole legal system, a branch of law, a particular legal institution.
* Descriptive sense – principles can be reconstructed from sets of particular rules in a process of induction.
* Non-positivism sense
Rules are valid because they meet formal criteria (so called test of pedigree). They have precise scope of application; therefore they are applied in ‘all or nothing’ mode. In the case of a collision between the rules, one of them is repealed and is not binding any more. Any ‘middle’ solution cannot be applied.
Policies
Policies are norms establishing the aim which is to be achieved by addressees of a particular legal instrument. Usually they appear in constitutional provisions. In a sense, they describe general aspirations of the lawgiver, without giving more precise prescriptions as for the way of achieving them. Policies may be either quite technical and precise (e.g., guaranteeing a certain amount of electric energy produced with a use of ‘green technologies’), or axiological and open for various interpretations. The second type is typical for constitutional rules.
Postulates of legal system
Postulates of legal system are basic qualities legal system should possess.
Two basic postulates of modern legal system
Coherence (no collisions between norms) and completeness (no loopholes in the system)
Loopholes in the law
Axiological lacuna is an outcome of comparing existing legal system with the ideal one.
* Extra legem – the lack of norm that should exist in the legal system is assessed negatively, not possible to do because of the other law.
* Contra legem – the existence of the norms is judged negatively.
* Praeter legem – the existence of the norm is judged as too general, lack of information.
Constructional lacuna is an outcome of analysing internal relations between norms within the system by itself.
* Specific loopholes – the law-making process is unfinished, what results in a situation when there lacks a regulation that should be issued according to another norm.
* Technical loopholes – law-making process has been finished but the regulation is incomplete.
Collisions between the norms
two norms refer to the same issue, but they cannot be both applied. Collisions can be divided into:
a) Logical (contrary and contradiction)
b) Praxeological
c) Axiological