EXAM Defences To Homicide Flashcards
Self defence and defensive homicide
The accused must prove he or she:
- had belief their action was necessary to prevent serious injury or death
- had reasonable grounds for this belief
Duress
Accused must show there was an extremely serious threat to themselves or close one of death or serious injury. Accused must reasonably believe:
- threat of harm will be carried out unless they commit the crime
- committing crime is the only reasonable way of avoiding harm
Sudden or extraordinary emergency
Person will not be found guilty of homicide if they reasonably believe that:
- sudden emergency or situation
- actions are the only reasonable way of dealing with the situation
Mental impairment
This defence exists when the person was suffering a mental illness at the time of the crime and as a result the person:
- did not know what he/she was doing
- did not think about conduct like ordinary people
Automatism
Is concerned with involuntary actions which aren’t caused by disease of the mind and for it to be accepted it must be shown the act was:
- involuntary; spasm or reflex action
- unconscious; sleepwalking
Itoxication
If the accused is so drunk or effected by drugs that he/she cannot form men’s Rea
Accident
If mens Rea did not exist the accused cannot be found guilty of a crime