exam ch 9-12 Flashcards
oculesics
- the study of how human beings communicate through the eyes
- we associate eye movement with expressions
gaze
- an individuals looking behavior may or may not be looking at someone
- zoning out
mutual gaze
2 people knowingly gaze at each other
- more common
eye contact
- looking directly into someones eyes
- less common
- varies with other persons appearance
normal gazing
varies with background, personalities, topic, other person’s gazing pattern
- greater than 3 = awkward
regulating the flow of communication
- visual contact occurs when we want to signal the comm channel is open
- we look often and continue to look until we have began our interaction
- also used to close/end communication
monitoring feedback
- people seek feedback concerning the reactoin of others
- if someone looks at you when talking it suggests interest
reflecting cognitive activity
- listeners and speakers tend to avoid gazing at others when processing difficult ideas
- averted gaze often reflects a shift in attention from external to internal
expressing emotions
a glance at the eye area provides a great deal of information about emotions expressed
communicating the the nature of the interpersonal relationship
- relationships are characterized by different status levels can be reflected in eye patterns
- lower status show respect by gazing at higher status
- higher status feel less of a need to gaze at lower status
- eye contact is greater in intimate relationships
- the closer we feel with someone the more we make eye contact with them
distance
- gazing and mutual gazing increases as distance increases
- decreases as we get closer to each other
- we tend to have less visual contact when we feel too close in terms of physical closeness ex. in an elevator
physical characteristics
- objects or people in our environment change our gaze
- when you take in unfamiliar stimuli gaze increases
- we condition ourselves to gaze not stare
personality characteristics
- emotional, physical, and personality characteristics can all influence eye behavior
- higher intelligence = more gazing
- lower self esteem = less gazing
- more extroverted, agreeable, or open = more gazing
topics and tasks
- if a topic is happy or more upbeat = more gazing
- if engaged in an intimate conversation with someone we do not have an intimate relationship with we tend to look away. ex. doctor
- if we are trying to persuade someone we engage in more gazing
cultural background and racial attiudes
- eye behavior varies according to the environment in which we learn social norms
- western cultures (USA) some eye contact is desired between high and low status
- eastern cultures (Japan) eye contact between high and low status could be viewed as disrespectful
pupil dialation
pupil increases in size
pupil constriction
pupil decreases in size
pupil dilation and constriction
- often times social implications can be derived from these behaviors
- sometimes hard to see
- dilate when interested but not very accurate
deception
an intentional act in which sender knowingly transmit a message to mislead another by fostering false impressions, beliefs, or understandings
the pervasiveness of deception
- people like 1-2 times a day (big lies)
- 10 - 15 small lies
- deception is a part of everyday life
nature of nonverbal deception
- humans use deception for positive and negative reasons
- deception can ruin relationships
- hard to gain back trust
self focused motives of deception
- protect self image
- maintain privacy
partner focused motives of deception
- helping a target
- protect a partners emotions (friends/family)
relationship focused motives of deception
- avoid conflict
- avoid relational break up
- avoid violating roles
evolutionary perspective of deception
- as a species we learn to use deception as a survival mechanism
- natural inclination to protect selves and family
- survival of the fittest. people better at detecting lies or making lies are favored
the leakage hypothesis of deception
- deception os associated with various internal physiological responses
- are measurable/noticeable
- deceivers try to compensate for tells
- receivers try to notice tells