exam 4 Flashcards
Social comparison theory
evaluate our abilities and beliefs by comparing ourselves with others
Upward vs downward social comparison
Upward - comparing ourselves to others that have it better
Downward - comparing self to others who are doing worse
Enlightenment
learning about a psychological concept changes real world behavior for the better
Halo effect
when someone has one good trait we assume they have many good traits
Self fulfilling prophecy
people behave in a way they are expected to behave
Chameleon effect
Unconsciously mimic those around you
Attitude component - Affective
emotional reaction coming from a stimulus
Attitude component - Behavioral
how you want to behaviorally respond to the stimulus
Attitude component - Cognitive
thoughts and reactions that come from the stimulus
Attitude dimension - Strength
attitude you’ve had for a long time or impacted your life is stronger, hard to change
Attitude dimension - Accessibility
what attitude is most influential depends on what is most accessible
Attitude dimension - Ambivalence
hold negative and positive reactions to a stimulus at the same time
Attitude change component - source
entity trying to cause change
Attitude change component - receiver
person being changed
Attitude change component - message
how you get change to happen
Attitude change component - channel
way message gets to receiver
Cognitive dissonance
two contrasting thoughts or behaviors make people uncomfortable, seek to eliminate by making thoughts align with behavior or other thoughts
Self perception theory
we don’t know our attitudes, we determine them from our behaviors
Impression management theory
attitudes depend on impression you want to give off
Elaboration likelihood model
Central - using message as a metric for change
Peripheral - can’t rely on message so you try to distract from it
Foot in the door
Start with something small where you expect them to say yes, increase size of requests until you reach goal
Door in the face
ask for an unreasonable thing you expect them to say no to, follow up with more reasonable request
Attributions
how we explain people’s actions and events
Stable vs unstable attributions
stable - reasoning is unlikely to change
unstable - reasoning is likely to change