Exam 2 Terms Continued Flashcards
affect-as-information theory
explains mood congruence by saying people misattribute a pre-existing mood state as indicative of their reaction to an unrelated target
affect infusion model (AIM)
suggests that mood effects on cognition depend on the kind of information-processing strategy used (direct access, motivational processing, heuristic processing, substantive processing)
anchoring and adjustment heuristic
we begin with a first approximation (anchor), then make adjustments to that number on the basis of additional info; first impressions affect later ones and carry more weight than they should
associative network model
idea that moods are linked to an associative network of memory representations; e.g. a mood state can automatically prime representations linked to that mood
attention
a state of focused awareness or concentration of mental activity
availability heuristic
basing estimates of likelihood on the ease with which we can think of examples
base rate fallacy
ignoring or underemphasizing how often the event occurs in the population
bias blind spot
meta-bias (bias concerning your bias); unaware of your own biases yet we can easily detect bias in others
Broadbent’s Filter Model
the physical characteristics of messages are used to select one message for further processing and all others are lost; meaning of the message isn’t taken into account by the filter (occurs after); problem: attention can be pulled away e.g. hearing your name
central executive
monitors and manipulates the 2 working memory buffers; can add/delete items, retrieve info from LTM, transfer items from the buffers to LTM; Baddeley’s working memory model
cocktail party problem
the process of paying attention to one conversation with the distraction of other conversations happening around us
cognitive economy
each property is stored only once at the most general point in the hierarchy; semantic network model
cognitive tuning
argues that positive and negative moods have a fundamental signaling function that informs whether a relaxed or effortful processing style is required
confabulation
behavior in which individuals respond with highly detailed but false memories when asked to remember past events
confirmation bias
tendency to seek out evidence that is consistent with one’s hypothesis and deny/dismiss/distort inconsistent evidence
conjunction fallacy
mistaken judgment that the probability of the combination of 2 events is greater than the probability of either event occurring alone (statistically not possible)
context-dependent memory
memories become associated to the context in which they are studied; e.g. words learned on land were better recalled on land than underwater and vice versa
Craik and Lockhart view
it’s not how many times you rehearse, but how you rehearse (i.e. levels or depth of processing) that determines transfer to LTM
decay hypothesis
memories weaken as a function of time and therefore become harder to retrieve
decision
assessing and choosing among several alternatives