Exam 2: 4th Amendment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Amendment IV

A
  1. prevents unreasonable searches and seizures
  2. must have probable cause for a search warrant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the definition of searches?

A

When the govt. is LOOKING for illegal contraband.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of seizures?

A

When the govt. TAKES POSSESSION of illegal contraband

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of a search warrant

A

a formal written approval by he court to conduct a search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the definition of probable cause

A

Belief/ Proof that a crime has been committed or will be committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Officers must show __(1)__ when asking for a search warrant

A
  1. probable cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some exceptions to a warrant?

(meaning in these circumstances a warrant is not necessary to search)

A
  1. if something illegal is in plain view of an officer. this has been extended to smell
  2. If the owner CONSENTS
  3. lack a reasonable expectation of privacy. if you are in public on government property, you can be searched (in jail, in a courthouse, TSA)
  4. in Exigent (extreme) Circumstances an emergency situation
  5. people/ things coming into the US
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What court case justified its ruling based on the exclusionary rule?

A

Mapp v. Ohio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the background of Mapp v. Ohio?

A

There was a domestic terrorist on the loose, and the govt. believed he was hiding in Ms. Mapp home. Got a search warrant for her house. They go to her house and the terrorist isn’t there, but when they go in, and they find that she had pornography and illegal gambling strips. She gets arrested for having illegal contraband in her apartment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the question asked during Mapp v. Ohio?

A

Whether the arrest violated her 1st amendment right, freedom of expression?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the supreme court do during the case of Mapp v. Ohio?

A

Got rid of the 1st amendment claim and said you have a violation of the 4th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the ruling of Mapp v. Ohio

A

ruled that there was a 4th amendment violation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the exclusionary rule?

A

A search warrant must align with the contraband that is seized, if it doesn’t align then they can’t get arrested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Knock and Announce rule?

A

o When we have a warrant, the govt. must knock and announce that they are there.
o Must wait until they open the door

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the ruling of Richard v. Wisconsin?

A

Ruled that officer can just go in for two different reasons. (1) they believe the suspect can get rid of the evidence while they wait. (2) if they believe that there is a serious danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the background and Ruling of United States v. Jones?

A

Jones was a suspected drug dealer & the police needed evidence to arrest him. What the police did was put a GPS on the bottom of his vehicle.

The supreme court ruled that under the 4th amendment, people cannot be tracked without their consent.

17
Q

What was the ruling of Riley v. California?

A

The supreme court ruled that officers cannot search cell phones without either a search warrant or consent.

18
Q

What was the background of Riley v. California

A

Riley was arrested, and they went through his phone and found out he was a part of a gang.

19
Q

Terry v. Ohio was a case regarding

A

Stopping and Frisking

20
Q

What is stopping & frisking?

A

when an officer stops you and pats you down

21
Q

What was the ruling of Terry v. Ohio?

A

The supreme court ruled that officers CAN legally stop and frisk under the 4th amendment, if they have probable cause (believed that a crime has been committed/ is going to be committed).

22
Q

Why have police forces limited stopping & frisking?

A

due to racial profiling

23
Q

What was the ruling of United States v. Jones?

A

The supreme court ruled that under the 4th amendment, people cannot be tracked without their consent.

24
Q

What are current issues faced in regard to whether they have violated the 4th amendment or not?

A

govt surveillance
Drug test