Evolutionary Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

What is evolution ?

A
  • Descent with modification
  • Descent = a lineage of organisms characterised by hereditary similarity between parents and offspring
  • Modification = changes across generations in the distribution of characteristics, or traits, in a lineage
  • So evolution = the change in the frequencies of hereditary characteristics across generations in a lineage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What causes evolution?

A
  • Natural selection
  • Pre-requisite: Within a species there is heritable variability of phenotypes (caused by mutations or recombination during sexual reproduction)
  • Some variations result in more offspring (differential reproductive success); these offspring will themselves therefore possess these beneficial differences, i.e., natural selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Different types of evolutionary fitness?

A
  • Classical fitness = a measure of an individual’s ability for direct reproductive success
  • Inclusive fitness = a measure of an individual’s ability for both direct and indirect reproductive success (Hamilton 1964)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the products of evolution?

A
  • Adaptations: Inherited characteristics that emerged through natural selection because they aided in solving problems related to survival and/or reproduction. - Example: umbilical cord
  • By-products: Characteristics that do not solve adaptive problems and do not have functional design. They are coupled to adaptations. - Example: belly button
  • Noise: Random effects produced by chance mutations that do not affect survival and/or reproductive success.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EP: Confirmation of Darwin’s prediction?

A
  • “In the distant future … psychology will be based on a new foundation, that of the necessary acquirement of each mental power and capacity by gradation.” (On the Origin of Species, 1859)
  • Evolutionary Psychology: “The mind is a set of information-processing machines [modules] that were designed by natural selection to solve adaptive problems faced by our hunter-gatherer ancestors” (Cosmides & Tooby, 1997, p. 1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evolutionary Psychology vs. evolutionary psychology?

A
  • Evolutionary Psychology: - “A way of thinking about psychology that can be applied to any topic within it” (Cosmides & Tooby, 1997, p. 1)
  • “Most important scientific revolution in the history of psychology” (David Buss)
  • V.S. evolutionary psychology: (Merely another) field of inquiry; a sub-discipline/approach within psychology.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The goal of Evolutionary Biology + Cognitive Psychology

A
  • Goal is to understand the human mind/brain from an evolutionary perspective
  • The mind is composed of many innate, specialised, modules ‘designed’ by natural selection
  • These modules emerged through natural selection to solve pre-historical adaptive problems (1.8 million – 10,000 years ago).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is EP reacting against?

A
  • Standard Social Science Model (SSSM):
    1. Non-human animals are rigidly controlled by their biology, human behaviour determined by culture.
    2. Human infants born with nothing apart from a few reflexes and an ability to learn.
    3. Learning is a general-purpose process used in all domains of knowledge; children learn how to behave in their culture through imitation, reward, and punishment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Core Tenets of EP

A
  • All behaviour is a function of psychological mechanisms + input to those mechanisms
  • Not generally controversial but according to proponents of EP it needs emphasising:
  • “it is clear that no behavior can be produced in the absence of psychological mechanisms” (Buss, 1995)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Modern skulls house a stone-age mind” (Cosmides & Tooby, 1997)

A
  • Natural selection designed our minds to deal with problems that our ancient ancestors faced on the African savannahs
  • This was our Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness (EEA; 1.8 million – 10,000 years ago) and still is.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Characteristics of the EEA

A
  • The EEA probably consisted of:
  • Hunter/gatherer/scavenging subsistence
  • Nomadic or semi-nomadic
  • Low population density
  • Small kin-based groupings
  • Simple technology
  • High infant mortality and low life expectancy
  • Vulnerability (e.g., to predators, disease)
  • Few lifestyle options
  • Development of agriculture, living in towns, cities: Only 10,000 years ago (~1000th of human history!)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adaptive Problems in the EEA

A
  • Our minds were designed by natural and sexual selection to solve adaptive problems faced by our hunter-gatherer ancestors:
  • Surviving/avoiding predators
  • Food selection
  • Attracting mates
  • Forming reciprocal alliances
  • Parenting
  • Reading others people’s minds
  • All of these play a role in the success with which one’s genes are passed on. So natural selection designed mental mechanisms to solve these problems (Evolved Psychological Mechanisms)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Massive Modularity Hypothesis

A

-Our mind consists of many domain-specific information processing modules (Evolved Psychological Mechanisms)
-Each is “an expert in one arena of interaction with the world” (Pinker, 1997)
E.G.,
-Mate selection; Theory of mind; Perception of colour; Language; Detecting cheaters during social exchanges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mismatches between EEA and current environment

A
  • Modern fear responses reflect ancient dangers (Ohman & Mineka, 2001)
  • “Supernormal stimuli” (Barrett, 2010)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ultimate and Proximate Causation

A
  • Evolution produces adaptations that on average increase survival/reproductive fitness.
  • We do not (necessarily) do those things that maximize fitness today; we execute those adaptations that in the past increased fitness.
  • WHY does a certain trait exist?
  • ULTIMATE CAUSE – the reason why it increased fitness in the evolutionary past
  • PROXIMATE CAUSE – the immediate psychological, physiological, biochemical, and environmental reasons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EP of human mating behaviour

A
  • Humans (of both sexes) engage in short- and long-term mating
  • Human mating is inherently strategic
  • These strategies are designed to solve (prehistoric) adaptive problems
  • The adaptive problems differ according to:
    1) Temporal context (short- or long-term)
    2) Sex (male or female)
17
Q

Starting point 1: Sexual selection

A
  • Evolution of traits that afford a direct reproductive advantage (Darwin, 1871)
  • Two paths: a) Success at intersexual attraction b) Success at intrasexual competition
18
Q

Starting point 2: Parental investment theory (Trivers, 1972)

A
  • The sex that invests more in offspring will be more discriminating about who they mate with
  • The sex that invests less will compete more vigorously for access to valuable high-investing members of the opposite sex
19
Q

Differences between men and women in minimum obligatory parental investment

A
  • Women:
  • Internal fertilisation and gestation
  • Lactation
  • Maximum number of children is about 12
  • Thus, expect women to be more discriminating
  • Men:
  • Donate sperm
  • Expect them to be less discriminating but more vigorous in competition
20
Q

General prediction: “Short-term mating will represent a larger component of men’s sexual strategy [compared to that of women]” (Buss & Schmitt, 1993, p. 210).

A

-Adaptive problems of males in a short-term mating context:
– finding enough partners
– finding women who are sexually accessible
– minimising cost, risk and investment
– identifying women who are fertile

21
Q

Specific prediction: ‘Men will express greater desire for short-term mates than will women’

A
  • Level of seeking increases from short-term to long-term for women
  • Level of seeking decreases from short-term to long-term for men
  • Overtime, men have more partners than woman
22
Q

Specific prediction: In a short-term mating context, ‘men will be willing to engage in intercourse after less time has elapsed in knowing a potential partner than will women’
-Clark and Hatfield (1987, 1989):

A

– Would you go out with me tonight?
– Would you come over to my apartment tonight?
– Would you go to bed with me tonight?

23
Q

Clark and Hatfield (1987) - Results

A

-Percentage who said ‘yes’
– Would you go out with me tonight? - (50% male, 50% female)
– Would you come over to my apartment tonight? (70% male, 5% female)
– Would you go to bed with me tonight? (75% male, 1% female)

24
Q

Specific prediction: Men’s preferences in a short-term mating context will reflect male short-term adaptive problems

A
  • SHORT TERM: want a mate who is good looking, physically attractive, promiscuous, higher sex appeal and sexually experienced
  • LONG TERM: want a partner who is committed, lower sex drive, more prudish, not as sexually experienced, less about looks
25
Q

General prediction: Women will tend to favour a long-term mating strategy (compared to men)

A
-Adaptive problems of women in a long-term context
involve finding men who: 
– are able to invest 
– are willing to invest 
– offer physical protection 
– offer commitment 
– have good parenting skills 
– have good gene quality
26
Q

Specific prediction: In a long-term context, ‘women, more than men, will desire cues to a potential mate’s ability to acquire resources, including ambition, good earning capacity, professional degrees and wealth’

A
  • 20 women and 28 men evaluated the importance of certain characteristics:
  • has a promising career
  • has good financial prospects
  • likely to succeed in their profession
  • likely to earn a lot of money
  • has a reliable future career
  • Long-term resource potential: women’s mate preferences
  • Higher means for long term than short term
27
Q

Buss (1989)

-Inter-continent consistency of women’s higher valuation of financial prospects in a long-term mate compared to men:

A
  • Women consistently valued money over men in all countries

- Japan and Zambia highest, Australia lowest

28
Q

EP of human mating behaviour: Some criticisms

A

-The data are often open to non-evolutionary based explanations
-Take, e.g., Buss’ (1989) cross-cultural study of sex differences in the valuation of financial prospects in a long-term mate
-Low socio-economic status groups highly underrepresented
– The sex difference diminishes as economic inequality between the sexes diminishes

29
Q

Challenges to EP: Massive modularity?

A
  • Could general mechanisms (e.g., social learning) not be applied to different adaptive problems?
  • The most fully articulated accounts of modularity (e.g., Fodor, 2000) posit that while some processes are indeed modular (‘input processes’), ‘central’ cognitive functions are domain general.
30
Q

Challenges to EP: Do modern skulls really house a stone-age mind?

A
  • EP framework claims 10,000 years insufficient for “new complex designs”
  • Did natural selection just stop? - Aren’t human minds still adapting rather than already adapted?
  • Reliance on the unknown (unknowable?) EEA
  • EEA more variable than EP assumes?
31
Q

Challenges to EP: Massive modularity? (cont..)

-Evidence that modular specialisation is determined over the course of within-individual brain development

A

> Additive vs. subtractive neuronal processes
Genes only involved in the additive type…
…and yet it is the subtractive type that is responsible for modular specialisation
Specialised modules are thus the result of an individual’s history of interaction with the local environment