Evolutionary Personality Theories Flashcards

1
Q

Briefly explain Darwin’s evolutionary theory.

A

Natural selection - characteristics that are adaptive for survival are more likely to be passed on.
Sexual selection - characteristics that are desirable to a mate and that win intrasexual competition.
Natural variation + struggle for survival/reproduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is it hard to test evolutionary psychology?

A

Cannot go back in time and test by observation. Have to use indirect measures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three main psychological features which can be tested in evolutionary psychology?

A

Functional - would they aid survival or reproduction?
Domain-specific - particular issue.
Numerous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three main levels of explanation?

A

Nomothetic - evolved group differences, structure of individual differences.
Idiographic - individual uniqueness.
Evolved characteristics of human nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What approach do most evolutionary theories use?

A

Nomothetic approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name the group differences in mating strategies for men and women (Buss & Schmitt, 1993):

A

Women - high parental investment, more selective, look for faithfulness, resources, status, ambition, commitment, health, intelligence.
Men - low parental investment, short-term mating, look for fertility, fidelity, youth, faithfulness.
Evidence is cross-cultural.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is important to remember about the variation between and within-groups?

A

Within-groups variation is larger than between-groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the traditional evolutionary view?

A

Individual differences reflect random variation and can be discarded as noise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the modern evolutionary view?

A

Traits reflect a range of equally adaptive strategies.

There is no single optimal combination across contexts/time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain stabilising, directional, fluctuating and negative frequency-dependent selection.

A

Stabilising - initial large range, over time, extremes are widdled out due to less chance of survival/mating.
Directional - population moves from one end to another.
Fluctuating - No consistent pattern.
Negative frequency-dependent - characteristics are more adaptive if there are fewer individuals using it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the life history theory (Wilson, 1975)?

A

Different individuals = different strategies to maximise survival + reproduction success.
Individual has finite energy, therefore, each strategy = trade-off between costs + benefits.
Theory applied to differences between species + sex differences.
Recently applied to individual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What inspired the K-factor theory (Rushton, 1985)?

A

The life history theory (Wilson, 1975).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the K-factor theory (Rushton, 1985).

A

Personality dimension reflecting mating effort vs parental investment.
Low K factor = more invested in mating effort. (High effort to attract mates, machiavellianism and risk taking).
High K factor = more invested in parental investment. (High attachment to own father and to partners).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Do women or men score generally higher in the K-factor?

A

Women (but there is a lot of variation within-groups).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Name some strengths of the big five personality traits.

A

Universal.
Seen in other species.
Moderate-high heritability estimates.
Relevant for challenges of survival and reproduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the big five personality traits?

A

Openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism.
(Honesty/humility has also been discussed).

17
Q

Name some of the adaptive trade-offs of each trait (big five/six).

A

Openness: high = creative, attractive. Low = less risk of psychosis.
Conscientiousness: high = organised, healthy. Low = spontaneous, less obsessional.
Extraversion: high = more mating opportunities, more risk-taking, sociable. Low = parental investment, less risk-taking.
Agreeableness: high = could be taken advantage of, cooperation, empathic. Low = ruthless, wary of others.
Neuroticism: high = alert to threats, motivate achievement. Low = more socially desirable, health, calm.
Honesty/humility: high = trust from others, humble, mutual help. Low = easier to manipulate others.

18
Q

How does extraversion affect the number of sexual partners + infidelity (Nettle, 2005)?

A

High extraversion = more sexual partners + higher infidelity.

19
Q

How does extraversion affect the number of children with different partners (Nettle, 2005)?

A

More partners + more children.

20
Q

Name some costs of extraversion (Nettle, 2005).

A

Infidelity + children from multiple partners = reduced investment.
Higher extraversion = more hospitalised due to illness/accident.
Related to higher criminal/anti-social behaviour.
However… More grandchildren! Therefore, extraverts are ultimately more successful in evolutionary terms.
Optimal level fluctuates depending on conditions.

21
Q

How are the K-factor and personality traits linked?

A

Low K-factor = high psychoticism + neuroticism.

Extraversion not highly correlated with low or high K-factor.

22
Q

What is the main strength of evolutionary personality theories?

A

Proposed ultimate explanation for behaviour + complements other levels of analysis.

23
Q

What are the main weaknesses of evolutionary personality theories?

A

No way of knowing what problems our ancestors actually faced.
Evidence cannot test causality or compare to similar species.
Other influences may be stronger than evolutionary ones (e.g. sociocultural).
Reductionist.
It is a relatively young field.
Unfalsifiable + speculative.