Evidence NY Distinctions Flashcards
What is NY’s standard for conditional relevance of evidence?
NY = Whether the fact could be found "rationally" by the jury Federal = preponderance of the evidence
What is NY’s standard for co-conspirator hearsay exception?
NY = prima facie evidence of a conspiracy, without relying on the statement offered. Federal = preponderance of the evidence
What is NY’s standard for finding that a prior bad act occurred before admitting them?
NY = clear and convincing evidence / "sufficient" evidence for documentary evidence Federal = preponderance of the evidence
What is NY’s standard for authentication of evidence?
NY = clear and convincing evidence Federal = sufficient evidence
What is NY’s standard for determining that wrongdoing occurred under the “forfeiture by wrongdoing” exception to hearsay?
NY = clear and convincing Federal = preponderance of the evidence
What is NY’s standard for allowing a handwriting comparison?
NY = document must be "genuine" Federal = sufficient evidence that document was written by the purported author
What two types of facts may a NY judge take judicial notice of?
(1) adjudicative facts = pertain to the facts in the case at hand
(2) legislative facts = pertain to the law and judicial process
When must a NY judge generally take judicial notice?
Generally, NY judges have discretion to take judicial notice of adjudicative.
For legislative facts:
Mandatory = common law, constitutions, public statutes of the US and all states
Discretionary without request / Required with request = private acts of the legislature or US, ordinances, regulations of agencies, foreign laws.
Can NY law provide for the shifting of the burden of persuasion?
Yes. Both burden of production and persuasion can be shifted.
What additional ground does NY add to the list of 403 exclusions?
Unfair surprise
May prosecutors introduce character evidence relating to prior sexual offenses of a ∆ in a sexual assault case?
No. NY does not recognize this exception to the bar against character evidence.
(Note that federal law does recognize it.)
How may a criminal defendant prove a pertinent character trait in NY?
Only be community reputation, not opinion.
When may a criminal defendant offer character evidence of a victim in NY?
Generally, a ∆ may NOT offer character evidence of a victim.
Exception: ∆ may offer evidence of reputation for violence to support self defense claim if ∆ reasonably believed her life was in danger. Can also use specific acts if:
(1) ∆ shows evidence of self defense, AND
(2) ∆ knew about acts the time of the incident.
Cannot use evidence for proof that ∆ was initial aggressor.
Note: π may rebut with evidence of a victim’s peacefulness.
What is the NY standard for habit evidence?
NY = deliberate and repetitive course of conduct Federal = requires only a routine
In NY, what are the three cases when spouses cannot testify against each other?
(1) adultery cases, except to prove marriage, disprove adultery, or disprove a defense
(2) non-access during wedlock to prove illegitimacy of a child
(3) confidential marital communications
When can a child testify in NY?
Children under 9yo = rebuttable presumption of incompetence
Can a witness give unsworn testimony in NY?
A child or disabled witness unable to understand an oath can give unsworn testimony in a criminal case. But ∆ cannot be convicted solely on the basis of unsworn testimony.
When are jurors competent to testify as witnesses in NY?
Jurors can only testify about their verdict or indictment if it relates to juror misconduct. Otherwise they cannot testify regarding their verdict or indictment.
What is NY’s “Dead Man Statute”?
In a civil case, a party with a financial interest in the outcome cannot testify about communications with an adverse party who is deceased or mentally ill.
Exception: Survivors of a car, aircraft, or vessel accident can testify about negligence of the deceased party.
What is NY’s “voucher rule”? What are its exceptions?
Parties cannot impeach witnesses they call. A party that calls a witness vouches for the testimony of that witness.
Exceptions: “OOPSA”
(1) Can contradict for reasons other than impeachment
(2) Opposing party’s statements
(3) Prior inconsistent statements made under oath OR in a signed writing
(4) Remove sting from cross-examination
(5) Due process rights of the excused
Are prior bad acts admissible for impeachment purposes in NY?
Yes. They are admissible for impeachment if they:
(1) relate to truthfulness,
(2) are immoral or vicious, OR
(3) reveal willingness to place one’s own self interest ahead of society’s interests.
But party cannot offer extrinsic proof.
When can prior convictions be used for impeachment purposes in NY?
Civil cases = all convictions are admissible at the court’s discretion (except traffic infractions)
Criminal cases = all prior convictions are admissible except traffic infractions BUT must have “Sandoval hearing” + court can exclude convictions with prejudicial effect that “far outweighs” probative value.
When may extrinsic proof of a prior conviction be used in NY?
If the witness admits prior conviction, extrinsic proof is inadmissible.
Admissible if:
(1) witness denies or equivocates
(2) ∆ offers evidence of good character and conviction would negate that
(3) conviction is an element of the charged offense
When are prior inconsistent statements admissible as substantive evidence in NY?
Admissible if prior statement is made (1) under oath OR (2) in a signed writing
Civil cases = admissible as substantive evidence regardless of who called the witness
Criminal = not admissible as substantive evidence. Only for impeachment (if not barred by voucher rule)
(Federal = a prior statement made under oath is admissible)
What happens when eyewitness identification is used in NY court?
When a case turns on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony and there is no corroborating evidence, it is an abuse of discretion for a trial court to exclude expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identifications.
Does NY allow false confession expert testimony?
Yes. It is admissible in NY.
What standard does NY follow for the admission of scientific evidence?
The “Frye standard” = do a majority of scientists in the field endorse this method? (the “head-count” approach)
(Federal = Daubert standard)
What standard does NY follow for experimental evidence?
Proponent must show a substantial similarity in conditions between the experiments and the original occurrence.
What are the sources an expert may rely upon for his opinion in NY?
(1) personal observation
(2) facts and data made known to the expert at trial
(3) inadmissible evidence that is reliable and reasonably relied on in the field
(4) inadmissible facts derived from others that are subject to full cross-examination