Evidence Assessment 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses and Presenting Evidence

  1. Why?
  2. How for Witnesses?
  3. How for Trial?
A

Rule 611 - Control by the Court (DISCRETION)

  1. To be Effective, to Avoid Wasting Time, Protect Witnesses from harassment
  2. Direct = No Leading
    Cross or Hostile = Leading (ONLY on topics asked on Direct)
  3. Control or limit the time for trial + limit amount of evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rulings on Evidence

(a) Preserving a Claim of Error.

A

Rule 103. - if the error affects a substantial right
-And -
If ADMITS Evidence = Objection MUST be Timely + Specific
-or-
If EXCLUDES Evidence = a party informs the court of evidence substance by an offer of proof,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Competency to Testify in General

A

601:
1) EVERYONE is competent
2) Competent is NOT Credible - credibility is for jury to decide
3) Civil cases - sometimes Age is a factor and state law decides (Most have gotten rid of it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Juror Competency to Testify

A

606;

  1. At the Trial. A juror may not testify as a witness before the other jurors at the trial.
  2. Validity of Verdict: a juror may not testify about any statement made or incident that occurred during deliberations;
  3. Exceptions. A juror may testify about Outside Influence - extraneous prejudicial info brought in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Judge Competency to Testify

A

605:

- presiding judge may not testify as a witness at the trial. - No Objection Needed to preserve error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Oath to Testify

A

603:

NO Magic Language - can be ANYTHING to impress upon them the seriousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Personal Knowledge to Testify

A

602:

  • may testify to a matter only if the witness has personal knowledge of the matter.
  • Not necessary for expert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Writing Used to Refresh a Witness

A

612:
1) Can be ANYTHING - statement or object
2) Used for “Present Memory Refreshed”
[Had knowledge But forgot ]
3) an ADVERSE Party is entitled to have the writing produced at the hearing,
- inspect it,
- cross-examine the witness about it,
- introduce in evidence any portion that relates to the witness’s testimony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Relevance Analysis

A

401 –> 402 –> ANYTHING ELSE –>403

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Test for Relevant Evidence

(EXAM) (ALWAYS IN EVERY CASE!

A

401: [ It is Either Relevant or it is not]
a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence;
~and~
(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

All Relevant Evidence is Admissible

A

402
- Relevant evidence is admissible unless
[Exceptions] Unconstitutional ..etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Excluding Relevant Evidence for

Undue Prejudice,
Confusion, Waste of Time, etc

A

403 - BALANCING TEST (EXAM) (ALWAYS IN EVERY CASE!)
– Whether or not the Probative Value is Substantially outweighed by Unfair Prejudice
EX: Remote in Time = is it too far removed from the issue?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Subsequent Remedial Measures

A
407:
 measures are taken that would have made an EARLIER injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is NOT Admissible
But 
May be ADMISSIBLE - to prove:
another purpose, such as
  • impeachment or
  • (if disputed) … ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures.
  • Firing a Bad Employee counts as a Remedial measure

***Exception: Actions by 3rd Parties = Allowed in **

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Compromise Offers and Negotiations

A

408:
Not Allowed in for either party to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a DISPUTED claim (of validity or amount)

BUT / Exceptions.

  • may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice
  • settled and one of the parties backs out, the evidence is allowed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Offers to Pay Medical and Similar Expenses

A

409:

Not Allowed to prove liability for the injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements

A

410:
NOT Allowed any statement made during plea discussions
if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea or they resulted in a later-withdrawn guilty plea.
Exception = Perjury

17
Q

Liability Insurance

A

411:
NOT admissible to prove whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully
BUT may be for
proving a witness’s bias or prejudice or proving agency, ownership, or control

18
Q

Methods of Proving Character

A

405:
Direct - Reputation or Opinion - When evidence of a person’s character or character trait is admissible
Cross - Acts Testimony allowed on Cross
- (Specific ACTS). When character trait is an essential element of crime charged

19
Q

“Substantive” vs, “Impeachment “

A

1) “Substantive” = evidence being entered by either party that is for a particular purpose (To prove a disputed issue) that is NOT PROPENSITY evidence (both sides)
Vs
2) “Impeachment “ = attempt to discredit a witness

20
Q

Character Evidence; Crimes or Other Acts

A

404:
1) Not allowed as Propensity Evidence

2) Is Allowed if
- Defendant puts it in Issue / the prosecutor may offer evidence to rebut it
- Defendant offered it to put Victim on Trial ~ can use evidence for Def about same trait
- May be used for other purposes
- Civil Trial for Defamation

21
Q

Answering machine recording -

A

Best Evidence Rule

- can’t testify to contents unless original destroyed / lost