Contracts Review Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Surety will be responsible for any debt or other obligation of a third party (i.e., the principal) resulting from the principal’s failure to pay as agreed is ____ the SOF

A

Is Subject to the SOF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Surety - if main purpose of a surety in agreeing to pay the debt of the principal is the surety’s own economic advantage, rather than the principal’s benefit ….

A

then the contract does not fall within the SOF
and
an Oral Promise by the surety is Enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When a contract is made by an infant / minor –

A

Voidable by the Infant but not by the other party
- may either disaffirm (void) the contract and avoid any liability under it
~or~ choose to hold the adult party to the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Minor Contract for Necessities.

A

Must pay for them, but - recovery by the person furnishing the necessities is limited to the Reasonable Value
(not the agreed upon price)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SOF - situations

A
Mr- Marriage
S - Surety
O - One Year 
U - UCC
R - Real Property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SOF - Property

A
PIP
Possession
Improvements 
Payment 
-- Need 2/3 --- to enforce oral contract
> Part Performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fraudulent Misrepresentation requires - Elements

A

1i) the misrepresentation is made knowingly and with intent to mislead the other party (i.e., it is fraudulent),
2) the misrepresentation induced assent to the contract,
3) the adversely affected party justifiably relied on the misrepresentation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fraudulent Misrepresentation - cures the problem

A

No longer voidable if before the deceived party has avoided the contract - it is CURED to be in accord with the facts that were previously misrepresented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Price Spike due to unforeseen event - try to renegotiate / refused / refused to fulfill - Result ?

A

Enforceable - if contract price was reasonable when agreed to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mistake - 1 party made a mistake that induced contract

ex; Female dog instead of male

A
When one party is mistaken as to an essential element of the contract, 
Mistaken Party (buyer)  = Can Void the contract if she did not bear the risk of mistake and the Non-Mistaken Party (seller) caused the mistake or should have known that the other party was mistaken.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Services and Real Property Contracts deal with ?

A

Common Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Goods Contracts deal with ?

A

UCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mixed Contact

- Goods and Services -

A

Predominant Purposes Rule - whichever plays the bigger roll

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you analyze a contract (mnemonic)

A
All Contracts Don't Stink
A - Agreement = offer / acceptance
C - Consideration = bargained for 
D - Defenses 
Stink - SOF
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Offeror is the

A

Master of the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Secret intentions when making an offer - mean

> guy at bar w/ signed napkin

A

Depends on if he made an objectively serious intent to be bound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Specific Terms in the Common Law

A

Party, Price, Subject, Quantity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Specific Terms in UCC

A

Only Quantity

- Gap Fillers for the other terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  1. Requirements Contract

2. Output Contract

A

Quantity not an issue

  1. Will buy everything from that seller
  2. Will sell whole output to the one buyer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Offer must convey the right to accept

  1. Invitation to Deal ~ Advertisement
  2. Reward
A
  1. Seen as an invitation to deal - doesn’t convey power unless very specific
  2. Allowed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Terminating the Offer (squash the caterpillar)

A
  1. Express - communication to the offeree
  2. Constructive - Offeree learns that the offeror has taken action that is absolutely inconsistent with ability to contract
  3. Offeree Rejects Offer
  4. Offeree Counter-Offers - not just a counter - inquiry
  5. Offeror Dies - before formation
  6. Reasonable Amount of Time Passes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Irrevocable Offer (4)

A
  1. Option Contract
  2. Firm Offer
  3. Unilateral
  4. Detrimental Reliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Option Contract =

A

Offeree buys option to keep it open

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Firm Offer

A
  1. Merchant in UCC
  2. Signed by offeror and
  3. Promise to Keep Open
  4. Time - as long as stated or up to 90 days
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Unliteral Contract

A

Cannot be revoked if the offeree started performance

ex: walk across the bridge - halfway
- He doesn’t have to finish ..can quit the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Detrimental Reliance

A

Reasonably and Detrimentally Relies on Contract

  • (ex: Contractor / sub-contractor - subcontractor offers the materials for a price and the contractor offers to build ..contractor reasonably relied on subs offer to make his bid)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

If ambiguity about whether Unilateral or Bi-lateral

A

Modern approach = Accept by Either Performance or Return Promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Shipped the Wrong Goods - UCC

A

UCC = Rejection + Breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Reward – do you need to know about it to collect

A

Yes - must know of the offer in order to collect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Mailbox Rule

A

Acceptance when Sent - properly addressed / stamped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Mailbox Special Rules – Does NOT Apply

A
  1. Offeree sends something back first: like a rejection or counter offer
  2. Other types of communication must be received not when sent
  3. Options contracts - paid to keep open
  4. Unclear w/ email / fax
  5. Send rejection first / then Acceptance - whichever opened first
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Acceptance by Silence

A
  1. Unilateral Reward
  2. Unilateral where the other party can SEE you accepted (ex: Built the house)
  3. Past history of dealings where silence OK
  4. Offer states acceptance by Silence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Implied in Fact - silence

A

Acceptance through silence , gestures , actions

Ex: showing up for classes and payment is due

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Counter Offer - Common Law

A

Common Law = Mirror Image Rule
Acceptance Terms must Match Offer
or
it is a Counter

  • conditional acceptance is a counter offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Counter Offer - UCC

A

Different Terms on Back of Confirmation

- definite seasonal acceptance or confirmation acts as an acceptance UNLESS CONDITIONAL on acceptance of different terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Counter Offer - UCC confirming memo
Additional Terms (4 Elements)
– confirming Memo w/ additional terms

A

Rarely come into contract - Only in if

  1. Both are merchants
  2. Doesn’t Materially alter deal
  3. Initial Offer didn’t expressly limit acceptance to original terms
  4. Offeror does not reject new terms w/in reasonable time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Counter Offer - UCC - Different Terms

A

Knockout Rule

- knock out both terms and Gap Fillers

38
Q

UCC - Offer where both Parties act as if there is a contract but really isn’t one

A

Only terms they agree on in the writings

39
Q

Consideration in each contract means -

A

Exchange of Promises - detriment or benefit

~ not doing something you are legally entitled to do is a detriment

> Gifts and Conditional Gifts do NOT count

40
Q

Consideration can not be

A

Nominal - way out of whack

41
Q
  1. Past consideration

2. Promising Not to sue

A
  1. NOT a contract - save someone and then you comeback for money later // someone needs saving and they promise to pay you $500 f you save them
  2. Plaintiff needs good faith belief that suit valid to be contract consideration
42
Q

Modification of Contract - (Common Law)

Promising to do something you are already obligated to do - Pre-existing Duty

A

Not consideration - agree to lower rent ..landlord can still sue for the remaining amount due

EXCEPT When :

  1. Change in performance - agree to modify rent for lower amount but then modify lease to extend / now he can’t
  2. 3rd party promising to pay - sister agrees to pay extra $500 - now he can’t sue you
  3. Unforeseen difficulties preventing performance
43
Q

UCC - Modification of Contract -

A

As long as made in good faith = OK

> > No consideration necessary

44
Q

Promissory Estoppel - Detrimental Reliance

3 elements

A
  1. Promise that would reasonably be expected to induce reliance
  2. Promisee Takes Action based on promise
  3. Injustice can only be avoided by enforcing the promise
45
Q

Quasi Contract (aka - Implied in law)

A
1 Plaintiff confers a Benefit
2. Reasonably expected to be paid
3. Unfair not to get paid - FAIR VALUE
(ex: saving someone from dying by paying for Dr.)
>> unfair enrichment
46
Q

7 Defenses to Contract

A
  1. Misunderstanding
  2. Incapacity
  3. Mistake
  4. Duress
  5. Fraud / Misrepresentation
  6. Illegality
  7. Unconscionability
47
Q

Defense - Misunderstanding

Ship name

A

Different Meaning to same words (2 ships same name)

  1. Material Term
  2. Different meanings
  3. Neither party knows of confusion
48
Q

Defense - Incapacity (3 ways)

A
  1. Minors
  2. Crazy - Mentally Ill
    - can’t understand the nature of actions
    ~or~
    - cannot act in reasonable manner to transaction - other side knows or has reason to know
  3. Intoxicated
    - Voidable -
    UNLESS
    > Necessities (food etc) = get fair value payment
    > Keep benefit after they get capacity
49
Q

Defense - Mistake

A

A belief that is not in accord with a present fact

50
Q

Defense - Fraud / Misrepresentation

A

Misrepresentation = statement at the Time of Contract that is NOT True (either intentional or accidental)

1) Misrepresentation of a present fact (not opinion)
2) Fact is Material - or - Fraudulent
3) Made under circumstances which is is justifiable to rely on the misrepresentation

(Ex: Shitty car - “it runs great” - intentional / Shitty car but seller doesn’t know - accidental = get out of both)

51
Q

Defense - Duress

A

Threat that deprived other party of making a meaningful choice

  • Economic Duress - ripped off b/c no choice
  • Undue Influence / Intense Pressure
52
Q

Defense - Illegality

A

Illegal Contracts are unenforceable
(if pay up front then cannot get money back for the illegal action contract)
- Furtherance of illegal action is OK -
(cab ride to robbery - have to pay for the cab)

53
Q

Defense - Unconscionability (2 kinds)

A
  1. Procedural - defect in the bargaining process itself
    - hidden / surprise term / no meaningful other option
  2. Substantive - Rip-off by a term of the contract hidden on pg. 138
54
Q

Minors Incapacity Defense

A

Voidable (even if crash car) or
Can Keep Contract and ratify upon 18 yrs.

Exception = Necessities but then Fair Market Value Damages

55
Q

UCC - 2 merchants w/o contract but act as if they do - How do they from a contract?

A

Enforceable if

(1) a writing in confirmation of the contract is received within a reasonable time
(2) unless written notice of objection to the contents of the writing is given within ten days.

56
Q

Defense - Mistake

- Mutual Mistake

A
  • Affects both parties
  • Mistake of a fact at the Time of Contracting
  • It relates to a Basic Assumption of the contract
  • Material Impact
  • Impacted Party did not bear the risk (other party made the mistake and you believed them)
57
Q

Defense - Mistake

- Unilateral Mistake

A
  • One party
    [Same elements as Mutual Mistake]
  • Mistake of a fact at the Time of Contracting
  • It relates to a Basic Assumption of the contract
  • Material Impact
  • Impacted Party did not bear the risk (other party made the mistake and you believed them)
    ~ PLUS EITHER ~
    1) Contract would be unconscionable
    2) The other side knew of , had reason to know, or caused mistake
58
Q

Defense - Misrepresentation in Execution

A

Trick them into contracting = no go

59
Q

Defense - Misrepresentation / Nondisclosure

A

Other party Doesn’t learn about something bad
- you remain knowingly silent -
Applies to = Active Concealment or where Fiduciary Duty to disclose

60
Q

SOF - Statute of Frauds

A

*ALWAYS ASK - does SOF apply? Is it Satisfied? *
(Mr. Lemonhead candy)

Mr. - Marriage
S - Surety (Main Purpose exception -paying to for his own benefit)
O - Impossible to perform w/in ONE YEAR from K formation
U - UCC - $500 + Price
R - Real Property

61
Q

How to Satisfy the SOF -

A
  1. Full Performance by either side
    - Service (service for service) Contract Falls under SOF and one side fully performed - can other side defend w/ SOF? Nope (Part Performance won’t work)
  2. Writing Signed by the Party Against whom contract asserted (must have = Essential Terms)
  • UCC Goods = Quantity is the only term (only enforceable for that amount)
  • Confirmation Memo for Quantity = ok
  1. Real Estate = PIP / Possess, Improve , Pay (2/3)
62
Q

SOF - Custom Made Items

A

Exempted as soon as substantial beginning

63
Q

SOF - UCC / merchants

A
  1. Quantity

2. Confirming Memo - failure to object w/in 10 DAYS satisfies SOF if BOTH MERCHANTS

64
Q

SOF Modification - Parties want to modify

A

If new deal w/ in SOF then need to satisfy

65
Q

Parole Evidence Rule

A

Contract fully in Writing (look for merger clause) - then earlier evidence not allowed to come in

  • Can use later statements / modifications
  • Can use to define ambiguous terms
  • Can use for Defense to Formation
  • Can use evidence of Another Separate Deal
66
Q

Express Warranty

A
  • Describes the goods and is a basis for the bargain unless it’s an opinion
    > Sample or Model = Express Warranty
67
Q

Implied Warranty of Merchantability

A

MERCHANT SELLER
- Goods fit for ordinary commercial use

> Can Disclaim / does NOT Have to be in writing <
Oral - must use “Merchantability”
Written - Conspicuous, “as is”

68
Q

Warranty Fitness for a Particular Purpose

A

Relies on seller’s expertise for specific good used for special purpose that it’ll satisfy that purpose

> Doesn’t have to be merchant seller

** MUST BE IN WRITING **
and Conspicuous disclaimer

69
Q

Express Condition to Performance

A

Must be Strictly Satisfied -
- Can be Subjective / custom Contract but the person must reject in Good Faith ​(Bad Faith = Breach)

  • Can be Waived
  • Wrongful Interference Also = Waiver
70
Q

Implied Condition to Performance -

A

1 party performs - the other must perform

71
Q

Substantial Performance

A

Common Law - Only if not willful failure, then get damages
(ex- wrong marble used in construction - will be ok, unless payment expressly conditioned on right one)
> Can be divisible if mini contracts

72
Q

UCC - Substantial Performance?

A

NO - Must be Perfect Tender !

- Perfect Goods + Perfect Delivery

73
Q

Seller’s Right to Cure

A

If time left on the contract or there was reason to believe that the buyer would accept a replacement, then Buyer Must give time to cure.

74
Q

UCC Perfect Tender Installment Contract

A

Buyer can only reject a specific installment where there is Substantial Impairment that can’t be cured.

75
Q

Delivery - FOB Seller’s place of Business

A

Shipment Contract

  1. Goods to Carrier
  2. Arrange Delivery
  3. Notify Buyer
76
Q

Delivery - FOB Buyer’s place of Business

A

Destination Contract

  1. Must get goods to Buyer’s Place of Biz
  2. Notify Buyer
77
Q

Delivery - Tender at Seller’s

A

Just hand them over.

78
Q

Risk of Loss

A
  1. In contract ? = ok
  2. Breach = Breacher bears the risk Always
    3 . Shipment Contract = Buyer risk / Destination Contract = Seller risk
  3. Merchant = Merchant until Delivery
  4. Non-Merchant = When Tendered / avail for pickup
79
Q

Excuse for Non - Performance

- Impossibility or Impracticability

A
  • Unforeseen even that is a Basic Assumption of the contract .
    (i) an unforeseen event occurs;
    (ii) the nonoccurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was based; and
    (iii) the party seeking discharge is NOT at Fault

> If a party Assumes the Risk of an event happening that makes performance impracticable, then the defense of impracticability will not apply.

80
Q

Excuse for Non - Performance

  • Death
  • Frustration of Purpose
A
  • Estate has to perform if it can

- Something happened to undermine the whole reason for the contract (rare)

81
Q

Excuse for Non - Performance

- Modification / Cancellation

A
  • Both Parties agree to walk away / cancel = ok w/o consideration as long as some performance due by both
  • Common Law = Consideration for Modification
  • UCC = no Consideration for Modification
82
Q

Excuse for Non - Performance

- Accord + Satisfaction

A

Substitute option performance by agreement

  • Option to do 1 or other
    vs. Modification = only can do new one

(Ex: owes money will accept beer instead / non-performance then can sue for beer or money)

83
Q

Novation

A

BOTH Parties agree that a new party will take over one side’s performance
- Original Party = excused from performance

84
Q

Anticipatory Repudiation - Options for other party

A
  1. Treat as Breach and Sue immediately as long as performance not complete
  2. Ignore +demand performance = then wait and see
85
Q

Anticipatory Repudiation - can they retract it?

A

Yes as long as

  • they haven’t sued or
  • they haven’t materially changed position on reliance of the repudiation
86
Q

Expectation Damages =

A

(Default)
- Put party in Position as if contract had been Performed
> Must be reasonably certain of amount

87
Q

Unforeseeable Consequences Damages (Hadley Rule)

A

(Guy w/ big hat)
> Not recoverable unless party had a reason to know of possible special damages at time of contract
- Get special if known + Incidental

88
Q

Damages must do what also

A

Mitigate

89
Q

Reliance Damages

A

Return to as if there never was a contract

Time travel back

90
Q

Specific Performance Damages (only)

A

Common Law = Real Estate + Custom Service Provider (Artist painter)
UCC = Custom Goods

91
Q

3rd Party Beneficiary - right to sue

A

Intended = Yes
Incidental = No
Donee Beneficiary = Yes

92
Q

Assignment vs Delegation

A

Assignment = Benefits
(Prohibit = Breech / Void - No good)
Delegation = Duties