Crim Flashcards
Mens Rea - Specific Intent
Defendant Committed the act for the
-> purpose of causing the result that the law criminalizes
Purposeful
Specific Intent Crimes
FIAT First Deg Murder Inchoate Crimes Assault Theft
Inchoate Crimes
CATTS
Conspiracy
ATTempt
Solicitation
Specific Intent Defense - Extra Defenses
Vol Intoxication
Unreasonable Mistake of Fact
Malice Crimes
AM sure there’s only 2
- Arson
- Murder
Malice =
Def realized the risks and acted anyway
b/c he
Acted with reckless disregard of a high degree of harm
(Reckless)
General Intent =
The intent to perform the act
and
that act is unlawful
Statute says “with intent to…”
Specific Intent
Statute says “knowingly or recklessly did…..”
General Intent
Statute has - no mens rea language ..
Strict Liability
Transferred Intent
Def - plans to victimize A but Victimizes B instead …intent transferred from A to B
(Completed crimes only)
Merger
Lesser included crimes merge into Major crime
(Larceny into Robbery)
Inchoate Crimes into completed crime
Attempt = Merges
Solicitation = Merges
Conspiracy = DOES NOT MERGE // it is its own crime by itself / can be convicted of conspiracy to commit and the crime itself
Children
Under 7 = Not capable of committing crime
7-14 = incapable
14+ can be as an adult
Accomplice
Assist either Before or During
b/c Acted w/ INTENT to ASSIST the principal BEFORE or during
- crime and also any Foreseeable Crimes that occur
> LOOK for CONSPIRACY if there is an AGREEMENT <
Agreement + over act in furtherance of agreement
- Also any encouragement *
Accessory After the Fact
Assist the Def after the crime
DEFENSE - Mistake (Fact)
Negates Mens Rea:
Reasonable - Gen + Specific Intent Crimes
Unreasonable - Specific Intent only
DEFENSE - Mistake (Law)
Only if based on interpretation of official
DEFENSE - Insanity (4)
1) M’Naghten - Did not know the Nature of his Act -or- did not Know the Act was WRONG
2) Irresistible Impulse - Could NOT CONTROL himself
(3) Durham Rule - Would Not have committed But For the mental defect
4) MPC = (M’Naghen + Irresistible Impulse) – Did Not have capacity to KNOW actions WRONG or to CONTROL himself to conform actions to law
DEFENSE - Intoxication
Involuntary - defense to all
Voluntary - defense to Specific /FIAT ONLY
7 DEFENSEs
Mistake Insanity Self Defense Intoxication Necessity Duress Withdraw
Inchoate Crimes
CATTS
Conspiracy
Attempt
Solicitation
Conspiracy
Agreement between 2 people + Unlawful Act + Overt Act
[Once Agree = Crime done - can NOT Withdrawal !!]
- can limit liability for future crimes-
{MPC - Unilateral ..Undercover Cop = ok]
Attempt
Intent to Commit Crime + Substantial Step
[Defense = vol intox / unreas mistake of fact]
Solicitation
Intentionally Ask to commit a crime
[Crime = the ask]
[Agreement = Conspiracy]
Murder
Unlawful Killing of another person w/ malice aforethought
[Requires - MR + Actus Reus + Cause (- any defenses) ]