Evidence Flashcards
Hearsay that meets an exception won’t be admitted in a criminal case if
-Offered against a criminal defendant
-Declarant unavailable
-Hearsay was testimonial
-Accused did not have an opportunity to cross-ex the declarant prior to trial
Statements are testimonial if
the primary purpose is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later prosecution
Statements are not testimonial if
They are regarding an on going emergency
Evidence is relevant if it is
Material - of consequence
Probative - any tendency to make more or less likely
Relevant evidence is
Admissible unless
-Excluded
-kept out by the Court’s 403 discretion
FRE 403 allows relevant evidence to be excluded if
its probative value is substantially outweighed by
-Prejudice
-confusion of the issues
-misleading the jury
-undue delay/waste of time
-cumulative evidence
Evidence of a previous tort claim/accident is admissible to prove
-Previous false claim
-Injury to same party of their body
Evidence of insurance is admissible/not admissible for:
Admissible
-to prove ownership/control
-to impeach (ie for bias)
-as part of an admission of liability (if it can’t be severed)
Inadmissible
-To prove the def acted negligently
Subsequent remedial measures are admissible/inadmissible to prove
Admissible
-ownership or control
-rebut a claim of infeasibility
-prove that opposing party destroyed evidence
Inadmissible
-negligence
-culpable conduct
-defect
-need for warning
*Only triggered by measures taken after the incident at issue
Civil settlements/negotiations are inadmissible to prove ___ but the rule is only triggered if ____
-validity or amount of a claim
-impeach by PINS
There is a claim or threat of a claim AND dispute as to the liability or amount
An exception allows civil settlements/negotiations to be offered if
by the government when offered in a criminal case
Aspects of plea discussions that are inadmissible in any case:
-Offers to plead guilty
-Withdrawn guilty please
-Actual no contest pleas
-Statements of fact during plea discussions
Note: an actual guilty plea is generally admissible as an opposing party’s statement
Character evidence is allowable in civil cases only where
Character is directly in question - defamation, negligent hiring/entrustment, child custody
In these cases, rep/op/sp acts are admissible
In a criminal case, a prosecutor can’t submit character evidence until
the defendant introduces evidence of their good character
A defendant may prove their character through
-reputation for a pertinent trait
-Opinion
The prosecution can attack a defendant’s character only once ___ and through ____
Defendant offers evidence of good character
-Cross examination of Def’s witness as to specific acts of defendant
-Calling its own character witness to provide reputation or opinion testimony
A victim’s character may be attacked by the defendant through ____ only when ____
Reputation or opinion evidence
it is relevant to show the defendant’s innocence (such as establishing self defense)
A prosecution can rebut a defendant’s attack of the victim’s character through
Rep or Opinion testimony of
-Victim’s good character for the same trait
-Def’s bad character for the same trait
A prosecutor can introduce evidence for a victim’s good character for peacefulness without the defendant attacking it only in
A homicide case where the defendant pled self-defense
Evidence of a victim’s past sexual behavior or disposition is generally inadmissible except for
In criminal cases - if offered to prove someone other than the def is the source of the semen, injury, or other physical evidence or to prove consent
In civil cases - only if its probative value substantially outweighs the danger of harm/unfair prejudice
Character evidence is admissible if it is to prove something other than propensity, including:
MIMIC
Motive
Intent
Mistake (absence of)
Identity
Common plan
Or anything else independently relevant
The only instance where character evidence IS allowed to prove act in conformity is:
A criminal or civil case where def is accused of sexually assault or molesting a child
Handwriting can be authenticated by
-Someone familiar with the writing
-an expert who has compared
-Jury comparison
Ancient docs are authenticated if
-20+ years old
-Non-suspicious condition
-Found where likely to be kept
A reply letter is authenticated by evidence
it was written in response to a communication sent to the alleged author
Photographs and video are authenticated if
They are a fair and accurate representation
Unattended camera is authenticated if the camera was properly working
The best evidence rule, should be called the original document rule, requires
The admission of the original writing or recording IF the witness does not have personal knowledge independent of the writing or recording
Refreshing recollection is allowed, but the writing may not be ____ and the opposing party is allowed to ____
admitted
-Have the writing produced at trial
-Cross ex the witness on it
-Introduce portions relating to the testimony
A past recollection recorded allows
A record to be READ into evidence ONLY if after being refreshed
-the witness has insufficient recollection
-it was made when they had personal knowledge
-it was made, under the direction of, or adopted by the witness
-it was made when it was fresh
-the witness vouches for the accuracy
Only the opposing party can seek admission of the evidence as an exhibit