Contracts Flashcards
A valid offer requires:
- Manifestation of a present intent to contract demonstrated by a promise, undertaking, or commitment
- Communicated to an offeree
- With definite and certain terms
An offer may be terminated by
-Lapse in time
-Revocation by words or conduct
-Rejection
-Termination by operation of law
Revocation and rejection are effective when
received by the offeree/offeror
These are irrevocable offers:
-Option K (for consideration)
-Merchant’s firm offer (under UCC - by a merchant, signed, to be held open for not longer than 3 months)
-Detrimental reliance - if reasonably foreseeable and actual
-Beginning performance in a unilateral K - can’t be mere preparation
A mere promise to hold open is not binding unless detrimentally relied upon
A K is terminated by law through
-Destruction of subject matter of K
-Supervening illegality of K
-Death or insanity of either party (except for real property)
Acceptance under the common law requires
Mirror image acceptance - each and every term of the offer without alteration (any alteration = rejection and counteroffer)
For acceptance under the UCC
Alterations do not prevent acceptance AND they do not become a part of the contract UNLESS
Both parties are merchants, the alterations are not material, the offeror doesn’t object, and acceptance is not conditioned on new terms
Merchants are
Anyone who regularly deals in goods of the kind sold OR who otherwise by their profession hold themselves out as having specialized knowledge or skills as to the practice or goods involved
For confirmatory memos, firm offers, modifications, a merchant can be
Almost anyone in business
For implied warranty of merchantability/fitness, to be a merchant you must
be a merchant with respect to the goods of the kind involved in the transaction
The methods of acceptance include:
UCC - any reasonable means (promise to ship, current/prompt shipment, etc)
Unilateral contract - full performance
Bilateral contract - any reasonable way including promise or performance
Acceptance is effective on ____ unless ___
Dispatch (mailbox rule) UNLESS
-Offer stipulates that acceptance is effective when received
-There is an option K (acceptance on receipt)
-The offeree sends a rejection, then acceptance (first to arrive is effective)
-The offeree sends an acceptance, then a rejection (acceptance effective unless rejection arrives first and offeror detrimentally relies on it)
Consideration can be
-something of value, bargained for (even a peppercorn)
-Detriment or promise to do something
Exceptions to the pre-existing duty rule include:
-New or different consideration promised
-Unforeseen circumstances make modification fair and equitable or rise to the level of impracticability (modern trend)
-Good faith modification under UCC
-Where the promise is to a third party
Mistake is a defense to formation if
Unilateral - if the nonmistaken party knew or should have known of the mistake OR if the unilateral mistake was induced by the fraudulent behavior of the nonmistaken party
Mutual mistake - if there was a basic assumption whose occurrence or absence materially effects the K, and the party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk
Defenses to contract formation include
Mistake - unilateral, mutual
Fraud/misrep
Illegality
Incapacity
SoF
Unconscionability
Contracts subject to the statute of frauds
MYLEGS
Marriage - when marriage is a consideration for a promise
Year (1+) - must not be capable of being completed w/in a year
Land - any promises creating interests in land
Executor - promise to pay estate debts from own funds
Goods ($500+)
Surety
Parol evidence rule bars
Prior or contemporaneous oral or written expressions inconsistent with the terms of the writing
The parol evidence rule applies only when
the writing is the final expression of the bargain
If a K is not fully integrated through a merger clause, then
evidence may be admitted to provide additional, consistent terms (not to vary the terms)
If a K is fully integrated through a merger clause, then
no additional evidence is admissible
Exceptions to parol evidence bar include:
-Evidence of formation defects or conditions precedent
-Evidence to interpret terms
-Evidence showing true consideration paid
-Evidence in action for reformation
UCC will provide terms as gap fillers including:
-price (reasonable at time of delivery)
-place of delivery (seller’s business)
-Time of shipment (reasonable)
-Time for payment (receipt of goods)
-Assortment (buyer’s option)
Delivery terms in a noncarrier case pass the risk of loss according to:
Nonmerchant seller - passes RoL at tender of delivery
Merchant seller - retains RoL until buyer takes physical possession
UNLESS imperfect tender, in which case buyer does not take RoL
Delivery terms in a carrier case pass the RoL:
-Shipment - RoL passes to buyer on delivery to carrier
-Destination - RoL passes to buyer on tender at destination
-FOB - RoL passes to buyer on deliver to FOB location
Implied warranty of merchantability promises
that the goods are fit for the ordinary purpose
Only applies if the seller is a merchant of the kind of goods sold
Implied warranty of fitness promises
that the goods are fit for a particular purpose IF:
-seller knew of the particular purpose
-made recommendations
-buyer relied on those recommendations
For modifications at the common law
-Additional consideration is generally required
-Modern view permits modification w/o consideration if circumstances unanticipated at formation have made modification fair and equitable
-A written contract can be modified orally (unless mod K falls in SoF) even if there is a contrary provision
Modifications under the UCC
-Are allowed w/o consideration so long as they are in good faith
-Must be in writing if for $500+
-Prohibitions on oral modification are effective
A third party can enforce a contractual right if
they were an intended beneficiary
A third party’s rights vest if:
-they manifest assent
-bring suit
-materially relied on the K
There are two types of third party intended beneficiaries, only one type can sue the promisee for performance:
-Donee beneficiary - someone intended to be gratuitously benefited by the promisee, can’t sue unless detrimental reliance
-Creditor beneficiary - someone who is owed a debt by the promisee, can sue on underlying obligation