Evidence Flashcards
Burden of proof
Woolmington principle - fundamental principle is the presumption of innocence
Subject to specific statutory exemptions the burden of proof lies clearly with the prosecution in relation to all of the elements of the offence
Standard of proof
where the legal burden is on the prosecution it must be just charged beyond reasonable doubt
Any element which the defence bears the burden of proving need to only be approved on the balance of probabilities
Corroboration - one witness
One witness’s testimony unsupported by any other evidence will suffice to prove a case where the court is satisfied that it is reliable and accurate
AND
provides proof to the required standard
Two types of events where one witness is insufficient to support a conviction
Perjury and related offences
And
Treason
Admissibility of visual identification evidence
Good reasons for not following a formal procedure
A refusal of a suspect to take part in the procedure
The singular appearance of the suspect
Substantial change in the appearance of the suspect after the alleged offence
No officer involved could reasonably anticipate that identification would be an issue at trial
Identification is made to an enforcement officer soon after the offence occurred in the course of that offices initial investigation
Identification made to enforcement officer after a chanceMeeting between the person who made the identification and the person alleged to have committed the offence
section 45 visual identification evidence obtained by formal procedure admissible unless
The defendant proves on the balance of probabilities that it is unreliable
For example shortsightedness bad lighting etc
Section 45 visual identification evidence not obtained by formal procedure
Will be in admissible unless there was a good reason for not following a informal procedure
Or the prosecution can prove beyond reasonable doubt that the circumstances Identification was made would have produced a reliable identification
Admissibility of voice identification evidence
Inadmissible unless
Prosecution proves
on the balance of probabilities
The circumstances in which the identification was made have produced a reliable identification
Admissibility of defendants statements
Statement made by a defendant is Not admissible against that defendant If it is excluded under 28 the reliability rule 29 oppression rule and 30 the improperly obtained evidence rule
The reliability rule
Any pertinent physical mental or psychological condition of the defendant when the statement was made
Any pertinent characteristics of the defendant including any mental intellectual or physical disability to which the defendant as subject
The nature of any questions put to the defendant and the manner circumstances in which they were put
The nature of any threat promise or representation made to the defendant or any other person
Exception to the reliability rule
Where the prosecution wishes to use the statement as evidence of the defendants physical mental or psychological condition at the time the statement was made
With the prosecution office the defendant statement only as evidence of whether the statement was made
Assessment of reliability
That the circumstances in which the statement was made were not likely to have adversely affected its reliability
The oppression rule
Oppression means
Oppressive violent inhumane or degrading contact towards or treatment of the defendant or any other person or a threat of conduct or treatment of that kind
The oppression rule – once evidential foundation is established
Requires the prosecution to satisfy the judge beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant statement was not influenced by oppression
Judging the perspective of oppression
Oppression is to be judged from the perspective of the defendant