EVALUATION

Question 1

Wedekind (1995)

Answer 1

reductionist
HAS BEEN REPLICATED
all swiss, all in uni

Question 2

Zhou (2014)

Answer 2

HARE 2017 reliability
not eco
controlled order effects

Question 3

Gottman (1998)

Answer 3

Resesarcher triangulation
Data triangulation
May be causing fight (bad ethics)
Correlational (bi directional (comm or bad marriage))
Extraneous variables
Self selcted
Reductionist

Question 4

Bradbury and Fincham (1992)

Answer 4

Resesarcher triangulation
May be causing fight (bad ethics)
Correlational (bi directional (comm or bad marriage))
Extraneous variables
Only western
Reductionist

Question 5

Moreland and Beach (1992)

Answer 5

Good eco - naturalistic
Not controlled for existing biases
Population (only used students)

Question 6

Buss (1989)

Answer 6

Population (rural, less educated not represented) (geography culture and religion diverse) (many sampling)
Construct - marriage (sweden and nigeria) values choices interpreted differemtly.

Parallel forms reliability
Internal validity (back translated)

Question 7

Hazan and Shaver (1987)

Answer 7

Quasi - correlational
self selected - may have been motivated by common variable
Self reported (peak-end distort)
Construct (likert scale)

Question 8

Dion (1972)

Answer 8

Construct good (100 students ranked ‘attractiveness’)
Not eco valid
Reductionist (emotional state of judger)
Not consistent Dermer and Thiel (1975) (unattractive ppl rated attractive egotistical and vain)