Evaluate The Extent To Which General Elections In The UK Are Lost By The Government Rather Than Won By The Opposition. Flashcards
1
Q
Paragraph 1: Government Failures have been made often been the main reason for election losses (Ev)
A
- In 1979, Callaghan’s Labour government lost significant support due to the Winter of Discontent, which created a perception of economic and industrial chaos.
- In 1997, John Major’s Conservative government suffered from a loss of economic credibility after ‘Black Wednesday’ along with internal party divisions and sleaze scandals.
- In 2024, the Conservatives faced widespread dissatisfaction due to ‘Patygate’ the PPE procurement scandal and rapid changes in leadership.
2
Q
P1: Ex and Eval
A
- That elections are determined by the incumbent government’s failures rather than the opposition’s strengths.
- In all 3 examples, the ruling party’s economic mismanagement, scandals or leadership crises eroded public trust.
- Overall, government failures play a crucial role, they do not guarantee electoral defeat. Despite economic struggles and party divisions the Conservatives still won in 1992.
- Opposition must still present themselves as a viable option to government incompetence.
3
Q
P2: Opposition strength is important, but secondary
A
- In 1997, Labour’s landslide victory was partly due to Tony Blair’s centrist approach, removed the commitment to nationalisation. Made the party more appealing to middle-class voters.
- In 2019, BJ’s campaign effectively positioned the Conservatives as the party that would “Get Brexit Done” capitalising on public frustration with political gridlock.
- However, these elections were heavily determined by the weaknesses of the other party Major was viewed as incompetent and Corbyn wasn’t trusted on economic and security issues.
4
Q
P2: Ex and Eval
A
- A strong opposition campaign can enhance electoral success it is rarely the decisive factor.
- Blair’s appeal helped, but JM had already lost public trust due to internal divisions and economic failures. In 2019, The conservative campaign was well executed, but Labour’s perceived weakness and confusion over Brexit played a major role in their loss.
- A strong opposition is not always enough, even if the government is seen as competent. In 2015, Miliband failed to convince voters that they could manage the economy better than the Conservatives despite, dissatisfaction with austerity policies.
5
Q
Paragraph 3: Some elections can be won due to strong leadership and effective campaigning
A
- In 1983, Thatcher won a landslide victory not only because Labour was weak under Michael Foot but because her leadership during the Falklands War strengthened public trust in her government.
- In 2015, DC led the Conservatives to Victory by successfully framing the election as a choice between stability under the Cs or uncertainty under a Labour-SNP coalition (playing on fears of this coalition following the referendum the year before)
6
Q
P3: Ex and Eval
A
- The government’s ability to show that it’s competent can prevent election loss, despite pressure. There are cases where the ruling party actively secures victory.
- These instance are less common than cases where governments lose due to public dissatisfaction.