EU Law - Slides 2 Flashcards

1
Q

How is the EUCJ called in regard to the internal market?

A

The “motor” of integration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the “acquis communitaire” the EUCJ has created?

A

Court has created the “acquis communitaire”, the acquisition, the wide array of principles and integrating mechanisms between institutions and member states. The court has made a significant contribution to harmonization and creation of true internal market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three actions?

Annulment actions
Infringement actions
Preliminary rulings

A

Annulment actions are legal proceedings initiated before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) by individuals, companies, or member states challenging the legality of EU acts, such as regulations, directives, or decisions issued by EU institutions. The purpose is to have the ECJ declare an EU act null and void if it is found to be unlawful or to exceed the powers granted to the institution that adopted it.

Infringement actions are initiated by the European Commission against a member state of the EU. These actions occur when the Commission believes that a member state has failed to fulfill its obligations under EU law. The goal is to ensure uniform application of EU law across all member states. If the ECJ finds the member state in breach, it can order corrective measures and impose financial penalties if necessary.

Preliminary rulings allow national courts of EU member states to seek guidance from the ECJ on the interpretation of EU law or the validity of EU acts. When a national court faces a legal question involving EU law that requires clarification, it can refer the question to the ECJ for a binding interpretation. This ensures consistent interpretation and application of EU law across all member states’ national courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Does the EUCJ have jurisdiction over CFSP decisions?

A

Exclusion: The ECJ does not have jurisdiction over CFSP decisions and actions that are related to the content of Union decisions or actions on the international stage.

Review: However, the ECJ may review CFSP-related actions and decisions regarding the legality of their implementation, ensuring that they comply with EU law, including fundamental rights and general principles of EU law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the judicial competence of the EUCJ? (5)

A

 Legal disputes (→ citizen protection?)
 Public enforcement of EU acts (Art. 17 TEU + Art. 258 TFEU)
 Legal interpretation
 Preliminary matters
 Advisory role for EU judiciary bodies (the opinions are binding)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What three courts belong to the “Court of Justice of the European Union”?

A

Court of Justice
General Court
Specialized Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the job of the Court of Justice of the European Union?

A

It shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Art. 19 TEU specifies the courts the EU has but also enshrines an important legal protection. Which?

A

Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.
Does that extend to substantive or procedural law?

A

Both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When claims are made by Institutions or Member States, does it go to the General Court or the Court of Justice?
How does it differ if made by individuals or companies?

A

Court of Justice.
It will go to General Courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is carence?

A

Another word for infringement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the “Acte Claire” doctirne?

A

Clear and Unambiguous EU Law: The doctrine applies when EU law is considered sufficiently clear and precise that its interpretation is beyond reasonable doubt. This clarity must be evident to the national court dealing with the case.

Exclusion of Preliminary Rulings: In cases where EU law is deemed Acte Clair, national courts may refrain from referring questions to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling on interpretation. This streamlines legal proceedings and avoids unnecessary delays.

Conditions for Application: For the Acte Clair doctrine to apply, three main conditions must typically be met:

The relevant EU legal provision must be clear and precise.
The interpretation of EU law must not admit of any reasonable doubt.
The clarity of EU law must be such that it can be applied directly by the national court without further clarification from the ECJ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why are preliminary rulings important in the development of the EU Law?

A

Paramount in the development of EU law
 More than 2/3 cases of the ECJ in 2017!
 Harmonisation of EU law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Provision for preliminary rulings

A

Art. 267

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Art. 267 - in what cases can preliminary rulings be made?

A

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning:

(a) the interpretation of the Treaties;

(b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union;

Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Art. 267 requires a question to be raised before “any court or tribunal” of a Member State. What are the three requirements to fall under this definition?

A

1) Public body
2) adversarial procedure required (two opposite parties)
3) body has the power to determine the final say over that adversarial. + permanent nature, rules of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A disciplinary body of a bar association, is it considered a tribunal or court under the EU law?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Do preliminary rulings aim to solve a dispute?

A

No, preliminary rulings do not aim at solving the dispute → they aim at giving national judges the correct tools in order to solve the dispute autonomously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the three main questions from national judges addressed to EUCJ?

A

 Interpretation and applicability of EU law? → interpretative matter
 Is EU law against the relevant national provision? → interpretative matter How must this provision be interpreted? One of the possible interpretations is in contrast with EU law. Set aside, if conflicting.
 Is EU law valid and applicable? → validity matter = Secondary law vis-à-vis primary law (treaties).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Under what two conditions can the EUCJ reject jurisdiction on preliminary rulings?

A

1) Act Claire Doctrine.
2) Already decided on the same subject matter or constant jurisprudence (the request was only made to delay the proceedings).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What kind of a case is required for a preliminary ruling?

A

Genuine disputes. Case law EUCJ. The court have to have to rule or request. It has always insisted to reserve preliminary ruling on disputes. Required a genuine dispute, not a hypothetical question. Interpretation is binding like advisory opinion but requires an actual dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Preliminary rulings are “pending original dispute.” What is the real name?

A

Incidenter proceeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the main functions of preliminary rulings? (3)

A

(Consistent) interpretation and applicability of EU law
Compatibility and consistency of national law vis-à-vis EU law
Individual protection (Van Gend en Loos)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Does a preliminary ruling invalidate national law?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the two actions that can result from a preliminary ruling?
What result can it have on other claimants?

A

National court can either invalidate the law (question of validity).
Commission can start infringement procedure.
It can open the floodgates to other claimants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What happens to the original proceeding in the member state during a preliminary ruling?

A

The national proceedings are suspended by the national court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What three types of judgements can the EUCJ in preliminary rulings have?

A

Interpretative judgement (Binding for the referencing judge + other judges and administrations (but further reference admissible). Interpretation becomes binding to all judicial institutions in the EU territory
Validity judgement (limited to the case at hand)
Invalidity judgement (same effect as annulment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Where do we find the legal basis for public enforcement of EU law?

A

Art. 17 TEU + 258 TFEU (Infringement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How can a failure to comply with EU law take place?

A

Through an action or omission. Omission is the most common case.
Must be complied with in a substantial manner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How does infringement process work? What’s the legal basis?

A

Article 258 TFEU

If the Commission considers that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaties, it shall deliver a reasoned opinion on the matter after giving the State concerned the opportunity to submit its observations.

If the State concerned does not comply with the opinion within the period laid down by the Commission, the latter may bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the objective of an infringement?

A

In order to provoke an action of enforcement following a violation

32
Q

What laws can be targeted by infringement for non-compliance?

A

Primary, secondary legislation plus international agreements

33
Q

What type of liability do member states have under infringement?

A

Strict and absolute. This means there are no justification clauses.

34
Q

The infringement process has an administrative and a judicial phase. What are the different phases in the administrative process?

A

First phase: Communications between the Commission and MSs in order to reach an agreement. Commission’s discretion. No obligation or deadlines. Just an informal letter.

Second phase: Formal letter; a notice defining the subject matter. 2 months for further observation. Not defining the Commission’s legal position.
After two months: Reasoned opinion.

35
Q

Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law. Where do we find this?

A

Art. 19 TEU

36
Q

Does the EUCJ have an obligation to initiate proceedings following a reasoned opinion?

A

No.

37
Q

What is the purpose of a reasoned opinion?

A

 Informing MSs of charges
 Coherent and detailed statement of the reasons

38
Q

If a member state does not comply with a reasoned opinion, what happens?
Does the Commission need to prove its interest? Is the violation of the reasoned opinion the target?

A

The Commission can initiate proceedings before the EUCJ.
The Commission does not need to prove its interest. The violation of the EU law is the target, not the failure to comply with the reasoned opinion.

39
Q

What could be a potential defense of a member state in case of an infringement?

A

Admissible defences? → see Transport Statistics [1985] on force majeure

40
Q

What are the consequences of infringement breaches?

A

Art. 260 TFEU
 Declaratory remedy
 MS to take “all necessary measures” → immediately!

Financial penalties: lump sum + penalty payment
 Commission’s proposal not binding on the Court but the final amount shall not exceed it
 Criteria: gravity, duration, ability to pay

41
Q

What is Article 259 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)?

A

Article 259 TFEU allows one Member State to take legal action against another Member State before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for failing to fulfill its obligations under EU law. Before initiating legal proceedings, the complaining Member State must first notify the European Commission and allow both parties to present their observations. If the Commission does not issue a reasoned opinion, the complaining Member State can proceed to ECJ litigation within 3 months. This article is seldom used due to political sensitivities among Member States.

42
Q

What is the legal basis for annulment?
Against what can annulment be taken?
When?

A

Art. 263 TFEU

Legally binding acts of the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission and Bank.
Earliest 2 months after publication.

43
Q

From case law, what characteristics must acts have to be fought against in annulment?

A

They have to be final (ERTA; 1971)
It can even be a decision in ongoing proceedings, as long as it is binding (AKZO; 1986).

44
Q

Kadi (2008) was a sanctions case. What did the EUCJ find?
What were the two results?
What type of action was it?

A

The imposition of sanctions from the UNSC did not respect due process. Right to fair hearing and respect for property was infringed.

In this case, the ECJ affirmed its right to review all Community acts with regard to fundamental rights, even if those acts are passed in conformity with an internationally-binding resolution. In this way, the ECJ gave itself the ability to “de facto review” the resolution itself. Additionally, by comparing the UN Charter to agreements under article 300(7) EC (218 TFEU), the court declined to place the UN Charter hierarchically above EC law.

Kadi challenged the decision through which the CFSP adopted the United Security Council Resolution. It was an action for annulment. He contested a secondary source of European Law, in contrast with the treaties.

45
Q

In Kadi, was the EUCJ’s decision to put the EU law before the UN Charter correct?

A

No, art. 103 of the UN Charter prevails.

46
Q

What are the three categories of people who can bring annulment requests before the EUCJ?

A

 Privileged applicants (EC, Parliament, Council)
 Semi-privileged applicants (European Central Bank, Court of Auditors, Regional Commission)
 Non – privileged applicants: individuals!

47
Q

When can individuals as non-privileged applicants make a request for annulment?

A
  1. Act of Direct and Individual Concern: Direct Concern equires that the legal act directly affects the legal situation of the individual challenging it. Individual Concern demonstrating that the individual is individually affected by the act in a manner that distinguishes them from the general population
  2. Regulatory Act of Direct Concern Not Needing Implementation: A broad administrative decision that applies uniformly to a category of individuals or entities, changes their legal situation directly, and does not require further discretionary decisions for its implementation.
48
Q

What are the grounds of annulment?

A
  1. Lack of Competence: The EU institution or body exceeded its powers or acted outside the scope of its competence. The act was adopted at the wrong time, concerned the wrong subject matter, was addressed to the wrong persons, or was adopted in the wrong place.
  2. Infringement of Essential Procedural Requirement: Failure to follow procedural rules required by EU law that are essential for the adoption of the act. An error in the form of the act, such as typographical errors or errors in numbering, which do not affect the substance of the act. Procedural aspects: Issues such as the choice of legal basis, obligation to give reasons for the act, and publication requirements not being met.
  3. Infringement of the Treaties or Rule of Law: The act violates EU Treaties or any other rule of law relating to their application. Relates to the form and substance.
  4. Misuse of Powers: The EU institution or body used its powers for a purpose other than that for which they were intended, or in a way that is inconsistent with the EU legal order. Grounds Related to Ends/Scope/Motives: The purpose or scope of the act was not properly aligned with its legal basis or objectives set out in EU law.
49
Q

What are the effects of an annulment?

A
  • Decision = act is null and void
  • Erga omnes effect
  • As if the act has never been adopted
50
Q

What did the Substantive Law of the EU do for the internal market?

A

It was the driving force behind the creation of an internal market.
It turned the EU from a Customs Union to a Common Market to an Economic Union.

51
Q

What are the general principles and tools of building an internal market?

A
  1. Non-discrimination
  2. Mutual recognition
  3. Harmonization
52
Q

Where can we find the legal basis for mutual recognition?

A

There is no statute for mutual recognition. This stems from a ruling of the EUCJ Cassis de Dijon 1979.

53
Q

What is the legal effect of the Cassis de Dijon case?

A

The legislation of another Member State is equivalent in its effects to domestic legislation.

54
Q

Harmonization is a different approach under EU law than mutual recognition, what is the legal basis? The objective, legislative procedure, and scope?
Where does this power end?

A

Objective: The primary objective of Article 114 is to create a level playing field within the EU’s internal market by removing barriers to the free movement of goods, services, persons, and capital. Harmonization aims to ensure that different national regulations do not hinder cross-border trade or create unfair advantages for domestic products or services.

Legislative Procedure: Measures adopted under Article 114 are enacted through the ordinary legislative procedure (co-decision) involving the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. This process ensures democratic legitimacy and allows for the input of elected representatives from member states.

Scope: Article 114 applies to laws, regulations, and administrative actions that directly impact the internal market. However, it explicitly excludes fiscal provisions, rules on free movement of persons, and labor law provisions concerning the rights and interests of employees.

55
Q

The “New Approach” is followed by the EU to harmonize the internal market. Under what circumstances justified? What are the restrictions?

A

Harmonisation restricted to essential requirements + justified when national rules cannot be considered equivalent and create restrictions.

Directives adopted under this new approach: free movement through technical harmonisation + high level
of protection of the public interest objectives referred to in Article 114(3) TFEU.

The focus is on harmonizing “essential requirements,” which are fundamental criteria or standards that products or services must meet to ensure a high level of protection for health, safety, environmental protection, and other public interests specified in Article 114(3) TFEU.

If national rules cannot be considered equivalent in achieving these essential requirements and create barriers to trade or distort competition, harmonization becomes necessary.

56
Q

What are the so called essential requirements under art. 114(3)?
There are four.

A

Health, safety, environmental protection and consumer protection, will take as a base a high level of protection, taking account in particular of any new development based on scientific facts.

57
Q

Where do we find the legal basis for the internal market?

A

Art. 2 TFEU
Art. 26 TFEU
Art. 258 TFEU (Infringement)

58
Q

In absence of harmonization, what are the obligations of member states to contribute to an internal market?

A

In principle, a member state has the legal obligation to recognize the legislation of the other member state (Cassis de Dijon principle).

59
Q

What are the two measures (broad, with equivalent effect) that were introduced for the customs union?

A

Art. 30 TFEU: Elimination of customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect. Customs duties of a fiscal nature.
Art. 34 + 35 TFEU: Elimination of quantitative restrictions on imports and exports and measures of equivalent effect.

60
Q

What are the three obstacles to free movement?

A

 Custom duties and charges having equivalent effect
 Discriminatory taxation
 Quantitative restrictions on imports and exports (quotas) and all measures having equivalent effect

61
Q

How did the European Court of Justice (ECJ) contribute to the establishment of the internal market in the European Union?

A

The ECJ played a crucial role through landmark cases interpreting measures equivalent to restrictions. It established a duty of equivalence, limiting member states’ ability to maintain rules that could exclude goods from other member states. This jurisprudence effectively prohibited any legislation, regulation, or administrative practice that might hinder the free movement of goods across EU borders.

62
Q

Art. 30 TFEU: Elimination of customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect. Customs duties of a fiscal nature.
Art. 34 + 35 TFEU: Elimination of quantitative restrictions on imports and exports and measures of equivalent effect.

Which one of these has an exception provision? Which article and what does it contain?

A

public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants (4 Ps)

Art. 36 TFEU

63
Q

What was the “German beer” case? What was the outcome?

A

Commission v Germany (C-178/84). The case addressed Germany’s Beer Tax Act, which prohibited the marketing of beer containing additives and reserved the name ‘Bier’ for products made from malted barley, hops, yeast, and water only. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that Germany’s restrictions on additives in beer were unjustified under EU law. The ECJ found that there was no scientific evidence indicating additives posed a health risk, as confirmed by international research and EU scientific committees. Additionally, Germany’s allowance of additives in other beverages contradicted its policy on beer. The case underscored the ECJ’s role in ensuring free movement of goods within the EU and preventing protectionist measures that could hinder trade. (the court found that art. 36 TFEU did not apply, this was a quantitative restriction case).

64
Q

Art. 34 + 35 TFEU: Elimination of quantitative restrictions on imports and exports and measures of equivalent effect. To what goods do these provisions apply?

A

They apply to sectors where EU legislation has not harmonised rules across member states. If there are other EU treaty articles or provisions that specifically regulate certain aspects of goods (e.g., taxation under different articles), both areas applies in areas not covered by these specific provisions.

65
Q

What is the “Spanish Strawberries case”?

A

Commission v France (C-265/95) (1997).

French farmers sabotaged imported agricultural produce, such as Spanish strawberries and Belgian tomatoes, and French authorities turned a blind eye. The Commission brought enforcement proceedings under TFEU article 258 for ‘failing to take all necessary and proportionate measures’ to prevent the obstructions to trade by the farmers (infringement). It argued the failure contravened TFEU article 34.

MS can be also responsible for actions of individuals that result in the disruption of the free flow of goods in the EU.

66
Q

Art 36 TFEU was from the 1950 and never amended. The Treaty did not cover the mutual recognition principle. EUCJ filled the gap with two measures. Which?

A

1) Established the mutual recognition principle.
2) Recognition that national legislation can deviate in some cases (art. 36 TFEU + Cassis de Dijon case)

67
Q

In class, we discussed the “Scottish whiskey” case. What is the key ruling from the case? What did it relate to?

A

Dassonville formula (1974).
The case expanded quantitative restrictions to “measures having equivalent effect.” “all trading rules enacted by Member States which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade.”

68
Q

Key message from the Dassonville formula (1974) case: “all trading rules enacted by Member States which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade.” What are “all trading rules”?

A

Laws, regulations, but also administrative practices.
Frequent inspections, for instance, are practice.

69
Q

How did the 1982 “Buy Irish” campaign lead to a quantitative restriction?

A

Member states are responsible for the conduct of individuals (“Spanish Strawberries case”).
Individuals made a publicity campaign to buy Irish products, which amounted to a measure having equivalent effect of quantitative restriction. The key factor was that the part had received public funds.

70
Q

What was the facts of the Cassis de Dijon case (1979)? What legal effect did it have?

A

Rewe, a large German retail company, wanted to import and sell Cassis de Dijon, a crème de cassis blackcurrant liqueur produced in France. The liqueur contained between 15 and 20 per cent alcohol by volume (ABV). Germany, however, had a law specifying that products sold as fruit liqueurs be over 25 per cent ABV. The Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (Federal Monopoly Administration for Spirits), part of the Federal Ministry of Finance, informed Rewe that it would not be able to market Cassis in Germany as a liqueur.

Complaint according to art. 36 TFEU.

The Court held that a regulation applying to both imported and to domestic goods (an “indistinctly applicable measure”) that produces an effect equivalent to a quantitative import restriction is an unlawful restriction on the free movement of goods.

In the same ruling, the Court established the so-called rule of reason, allowing non-discriminatory restrictive measures to be justified on grounds other than those listed in article 36 TFEU.

71
Q

The Cassis de Dijon case established the so-called rule of reason, what does it mean?

A

The Court established the so-called rule of reason, allowing non-discriminatory restrictive measures to be justified on grounds other than those listed in article 36 TFEU.

Cassis opened the path to a second way of argument for national governments to justify national legislation that put an obstacle to the mutual recognition principle. But it is on a case-by-case basis. Has to be reasonable and proportional. But these requirements also apply to art. 36 TFEU. Art. 36 TFEU was historically the only way to justify such a measure. The measure must be reasonable and proportional.

72
Q

In the Sunday Trading case, the court recognised that two principles from the Cassis de Dijon case. Which? What was the deviation?

A

The Court held that a regulation applying to both imported and to domestic goods (an “indistinctly applicable measure”) that produces an effect equivalent to a quantitative import restriction is an unlawful restriction on the free movement of goods.

In the same ruling, the Court established the so-called rule of reason, allowing non-discriminatory restrictive measures to be justified on grounds other than those listed in article 36 TFEU.

Following the rule of reason, the court declared that the measure was restriction on the free movement of goods. However, it was justified with the rule of reason due to socio-cultural reasons. It referred to an earlier case in which it stated that working hours ‘constituted a legitimate part of economic and social policy, consistent with the objectives of public interest pursued in the Treaty. ’ It therefore concluded that similar considerations must apply to Sunday trading rules since ‘such rules reflect certain political and economic choices in so far a’s their purpose is to ensure that working and nonworking hours are so arranged as to accord with national or regional socio-cultural characteristics’.

73
Q

What did the Keck case (1993) change from the Dassonville case (1974)?

A

Prior to Keck, the landmark Dassonville case broadly defined measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions (MEQRs) as any national rules capable of hindering intra-EU trade, directly or indirectly.

Dassonville’s expansive definition led to challenges against numerous national regulations under the premise that they could potentially restrict trade between EU member states. This approach significantly curtailed the regulatory autonomy of member states, often requiring them to justify even seemingly minor trading rules based on EU law compliance.

The EUCJ drew a distinction between product requirements and certain selling arrangements (CSAs). Product requirements would always fall within the scope of EU law and have to be justified but not CSAs.

Unlike what was decided before, rules in a country that restrict or ban specific ways of selling products from other EU countries do not necessarily hinder trade between EU states under the Dassonville ruling. This is true if these rules apply to all businesses in that country and affect both domestic products and those from other EU countries in the same way, both legally and practically.

74
Q

What were three post-Keck cases?

A

Leclerc (marketing): This case dealt with advertising restrictions on fuel distributors in France. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) assessed whether these restrictions constituted a certain selling arrangement under the Keck ruling and found that they did. This decision clarified that advertising regulations, if applied equally to all businesses and affecting domestic and foreign goods similarly, do not constitute measures equivalent to quantitative restrictions (MEQRs) under EU law.

Belgapom (price control): In this case, the ECJ examined whether Belgian regulations on the pricing of potatoes infringed EU law. The court ruled that price control measures, if they apply uniformly to all traders within the country and do not discriminate against products from other EU member states, may be permissible under certain conditions. This reinforced the principle that national price regulations can comply with EU law if they meet the criteria set out in Keck.

De Agostini (advertising): This case involved restrictions on advertising in Italy, specifically concerning the sale of collectible stamps through mail order catalogs. The ECJ determined that advertising regulations, if they do not discriminate against products from other member states and apply equally to domestic and foreign goods, may not constitute unlawful barriers to intra-EU trade. This decision underscored the importance of non-discriminatory application of national advertising rules under EU law.

75
Q

Where do we find the obligation of MSs to impose sufficient legal protection? What is the wording?

A

Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.
Art. 17 TEU