Contracts I - Quasi Contracts - Cases

Question 1

In Anderson v. Schwegel (1990), Anderson wanted his oldtimer repaired. Schwegel and Anderson were at a disagreement what “restoring” means. What did the court decide?

Answer 1

The court held that no contract existed between the parties due to their failure to agree on the term “restore.” Hence, quasi contract.

Question 2

Estate of Frances Cleveland v. Gorden (1992), in this case, Gorden sought reimbursement for the expenses incurred when she assumed care of her sickly aunt, Frances Cleveland. What was important for her to recover the expenses?

Answer 2

1) She was not a volunteer or capricious intermeddler. She was acting out of a family obligation (hence, not voluntary). It was not a gift (she documented her expenses). Her aunt did not protest to receive the support.

2) She provided necessaries to her aunt.