ethnicity - internal Flashcards

1
Q

what are the three internal features that affect achievement?

A

labelling, pupil identity, pupil responses and subcultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

GILLBORN and MIRZA’s evidence that suggests internal factors are impactful?

A

in one LAE black children werer the highest achievers on entry to primary (20% higher than avg.)
by the time it came to GCSE, they had the worst results of any ethnic group (21% below avg.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did teachers treat black students according to GILLBORN and YOUDELL?

A

quicker to discipline for the same behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why did teachers discipline black pupils quicker? GILLBORN and YOUDELL

A

result of racialised expectations. Teachers expected them to present discipline problems and misinterpreted their behaviour as threatening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how did pupils react to the harsher discipline? GILLBORN and YOUDELL

A

responded negatively and further conflict resulted. pupils felt picked on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did BOURNE find?

A

schools tend to see black boys as threat - label them negatively - result in exclusion.
only 1/5 excluded achieve 5 GCSEs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what do black pupils suffer from according to OSLER?

A

higher rates of unofficial exclusions e.g. internal exclusions.
more likely to be in PRU.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what part of the A-C economy do black pupils get placed in?

A

lower sets due to negative stereotypes about their ability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did WRIGHT’s study show?

A

multi-ethnic primary school - teachers held ethnocentric views: regarded GB culture and Standard English as superior.
assumed Asians would have poor grasp of English and left them out of discussions or used simplistic lang. when talking to them.
pupils felt isolated when teachers expressed disapproval of their customs/mispronounced their names.
teachers didn’t see them as threat but as a problem they could ignore.
Asian pupils = marginalised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

According to ARCHER how do teachers view EM pupils’ identities?

A

lacking the favoured identity of the ideal pupil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the three pupil identities constructed by teachers? ARCHER

A

ideal pupil - white, M/C, masculinised identity, normal sexuality, Achieving in ‘right’ way through natural ability and initiative
pathologised pupil - asian, ‘deserving poor’, feminised, asexual/oppressed sexuality, seen as conforming and culture-bound ‘overachiever’, succeeds through hard work> natural ability.
demonised pupil - black/white W/C, hyper-sexualised, unintelligent, peer-led, culturally deprived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were teacher’s views on Chinese?

A

homogenous, passive and hardworking mass. girls= too quiet, passive and repressed.
seen as achieving success ‘abnormaly’ - hardwork>ability, meaning they could never occupy identity of ‘ideal pupil’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Fuller’s study reveal about responses to labelling?

A

studied group of black girls in year 11 of London comprehensive. They were unlike the other black girls who were in low sets.
they channelled anger about being labelled into the pursuit of ed success.
they didn’t seek approval of teachers or limit friends to other achievers.
unlike other successful pupils, they conformed only as far as schoolwork was concerned.
didn’t give appearance of working conscientiously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how did the girls in FULLER’s study maintain a positive self-image?

A

relied on their own efforts>accepting teachers’ negative stereotype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what 2 points does FULLER’s study highlight?

A

pupils may succeed without conforming
negative labelling doesn’t lead to failure - not always self-fulfilling prophecy
anti-school - pro-education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what did MIRZA discover about the teachers she studied?

A

discouraged black pupils from being ambitious through career advice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what 3 types of teacher racism did MIRZA identify?

A

colour-blind - believe all pupils are equal but in practice allow racist to go unchallenged
liberal chauvinists - believe blacks are culturally deprived and have low expectations of them
overt racists - believe blacks are inferior and actively discriminate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how did the girls in MIRZA’s study avoid the negative attitudes?

A

selective about what teachers to ask for help.
avoid certain options with racist teachers
get on with work in lessons and not partake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the four responses to schooling of black boys identified by SEWELL?

A

rebels, conformists, innovators, retreatists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

SEWELL’s rebels

A

most visible/influential group but only a small minority of black pupils
rejected goals and rules of school
expressed opposition thorugh peer group membership
conformed to stereotype of anti-school, anti-authority ‘black macho lad’.
contemptuous of white boys and conformist blacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

SEWELL’s conformists

A

largest group. keen to succeed. accepted school’s goals and had friends from other ethnic groups
anxious to avoid being stereotyped

22
Q

SEWELL’s retreatists

A

tiny minority
disconnected from school and black subcultures
despised by rebels

23
Q

SEWELL’s innovators

A

second largest groups
like FULLER’s girls - anti-school and pro-education
distanced from conformists allowed them to maintain credibility with rebels while remaining positive about ed.

24
Q

what does SEWELL believe is most important in the underachievement of black boys?

A

role of peer groups, street culture and lack of nurturing father

25
Q

what is the danger with focusing teacher’s stereotypes?

A

they are seen as product of individual prejudices rather than of racism in the education system is run. e.g. marketisation GILLBORN and YOUDELL

26
Q

who believes we need to go beyond examining individual teacher racism and look at institutional racism?

A

TROYNA and WILLIAMS

27
Q

what is the critical race theory?

A

sees racism as an ingrained feature of society.

28
Q

what is institutional racism according to CHARMICHAEL and HAMILTON?

A

less overt, more subtle, less identifiable in terms of specific individuals committing the acts… it originates in the operation of established and respected forces in society.

29
Q

what is institutional racism according to ROITHMAYR?

A

a ‘locked-in inequality’

30
Q

why is institutional racism described as a ‘locked-in inequality’?

A

the scale of historical discriminaition means there is no longer any conscious intent to discriminate - the inequality becomes self-perpetuating

31
Q

how has marketisation led to discrimination according to GILLBORN?

A

gives schools more scope to select pupils, allowing negative stereotypes to influence decisions about admissions.

32
Q

what did MOORE and DAVENPORT’s research find?

A

show how selection procedures led to ethnic minorities failing to get into better secondary schools due to discrimination.
e.g. primary school reports were used to screen out pupils with lang difficulties, while application process was difficult for non-English speaking parents.
these favoured white pupils leading to an ethnically stratified ed system.

33
Q

what did UCAS 2015 find that suggests marketisation impacts ethnic minorities?

A

white students with similar A level results are more successful than EM students at gaining places at university.

34
Q

how does GILLBORN’s A-C economy affect ethnic minorities?

A

marketisation = rationing of education.

teachers neglect those labelled as ‘no hopers’ and many blacks are labelled as such.

35
Q

According to COARD how does the ethnocentric curriculum affect achievement?

A

what is taught in school mainly reflects white culture. Black students may view the knowledge being taught as insulting/irrelevant and have a low-esteem.
e.g. British being presented as bringing civilisation to the ‘primitive’ people they colonised.

36
Q

what evidence shows black pupils are affected by the ethnocentric curriculum?

A

TIKLY - African-Caribbeann students = aware of their invisibility in the curriculum and were frustrated by the focus on white people/Europe.

37
Q

why can the idea that ethnocentric curriculum affects EM be criticised?

A

Indian and Chinese pupils performance is above the national average.

38
Q

why do TRONYA and WILLIAMS criticise the curriculum?

A

meagre provision for teaching Asian language > European languages.

39
Q

why does GILLBORN believe the ‘assessment game’ is rigged?

A

if black children succeed the rules will change to re-engineer failure.
primary schools used to use ‘baseline assessments’ which tested pupils at the start of compulsory schooling but these were replaced by the foundation stage profile in 2003
overnight black pupils were doing worse.
in one LAE black children were the highest achievers on entry to school in 2000 and by 2003 the FSP ranked them lower than whites across all 6 development areas..

40
Q

why has the reversal in the ranking of black children according to GILLBORN?

A

FSP is based entirely on teachers’ judgement - baseline assessments used written tests too
FSP done at end of reception and baseline at the start

41
Q

what did SANDERS and HORN find?

A

where more weighting in GCSE’s was given to tasks assessed by teachers, the gap between the scores of ethnic groups widened

42
Q

what is the difference in how many whites and blacks were identified as ‘gifted and talented’?

A

whites twice as likely as Black Caribbeans

five times more likely than Black Africans

43
Q

what does STRAND conclude about his analysis of large scale data from LSYPE?

A

White-black achievement gap in maths and science tests at 14 = result of blacks being systematically under-represented in entry to higher tier exams.
reflects teahers’ expectations and self-fulfilling prophecy

44
Q

what does access to opportunities such as higher sets depend on?

A

teachers’ assessment of pupils’ ability

45
Q

what is the new IQism and how does it affect achievement?

A

teachers see potential as a fixed, easily measurable quality.
GILLBORN believes ‘potential’ cannot be measured and teachers’ attempts to do so reproduce racialised stereotypes.

46
Q

how does GILLBORN criticise the idea that the overachievement of Indian and Chinese pupils mean there isn’t institutional racism?

A

the image of them as hardworking ‘model minorities’ performs an ideological function, concealing the institutional racism.
makes it appear meritocratic
justifies the failure of other minorities - e.g. blacks fail because they’re unwilling to make effort
ignores the fact that ‘model minorites’ still suffer racism in schools.

47
Q

does SEWELL agree with GILLBORN?

A

no - racism isn’t strong enough to prevent success but external factors such as lack nurturing father are

48
Q

what does EVANS are sociologists should look at to understand the relationship between ethnicity and achievement?

A

the class and gender of black pupils

49
Q

what is meant by the ‘interactions effect’ CONNOLLY?

A
class and gender interact differently with ethnicity depending on ethnic groups.
e.g. there is bigger gap between white M/C and white W/C than balck M/C and black W/C
50
Q

how did CONNOLLY’s study show how masculinity was constructed differently depending on ethnicity?

A

saw black boys as disruptive and controlled them by punishing them and channelling energies into sport.
they responded by seeking status in non-academic ways
teachers saw asian boys as passive and conformist. seen as immature>threatening when they miisbehaved