educational policy Flashcards
what happened in 1944?
Butler Education Act
introduced tripartite system
what was the tripartite system?
11+ used to determine whether children attended:
grammar school, secondary modern, technical schools
suppossed to be meritocratic and allow ascribed status’ to fairly develop
what were the different schools in the tripartite system?
grammar - academic curriculum and access to non-manual jobs and HE. Mainly M/C
secondary modern - non-academic ‘practical’ curriculum and access to manual work for pupils who failed 11+. Mainly W/C
technical schools - only a few (bipartite system)
how did the tripartite system reproduce and legitimate inequalities?
channelled social classes into different types of schools that offered unequal opportunity.
gender ineqaulity by requiring girls to gain higher marks in 11+ to attend grammar schools
ideology that ability is inborn and can be measured early on, ignoring the impact a child’s environment can have
what year were Educational Priority Areas set up?
1967
what did EPA do?
aimed to compensate for poverty
provide schools with extra money and resources to raise poor children’s achievement and encourage parental involvement in education.
inspired by CD and MD theories.
what year was the comprehensive system introduced?
1965
which gov introduced the comprehensive system?
labour
what did the introduction of the comprehensive system involve?
11+ and grammars and secondary moderns = abolished
all children within a catchment areas would go to the same school
supposed to be meritocratic
why did the grammar-secondary modern divide still exist in many areas?
left to LEA to decide whether to ‘go comprehensive’
what is the functionalist view on comprehensives?
promote social integration, social solidarity and meritocracy by bringing students from different backgrounds together.
who criticises the functionalist viewpoints and why?
FORD - little social mixing between W/C and M/C in comprehensives due to setting and streaming
why do functionalists see the comprehensive system as more meritocratic?
gives students longer period to develop and show their ability, unlike the tripartite system, which sought to select the most able at the age of 11.
why do marxists believe comprehensives aren’t meritocratic?
‘myth of meritocracy’ - streaming benefits M/C
not selecting at 11 makes failure seem the fault of the individual> system
why might there not be a mixture of classes in comprehensives?
catchmemt areas:
people tend to live alongside others from similar social background
why could catchment areas cause W/C failure?
deprived inner-city catchment = predominantly W/C intake. parents may not be abe to educationally support children.
Schools become ‘failing’ and struggle to attract teaching staff
what is ‘selection by mortgage’?
A good school can raise house prices in catchment areas, causing W/C parents to be priced out of the housing market
what are the ‘successes’ of comprehensives?
- W/C have opportunity to pursue same qualifications as M/C
- more W/C now enter HE
- less bright students benefit from the greater range of courses
- exam results of top comprehensives compare well with private sector
what are the ‘failures’ of comprehensives?
- HARGREAVES and BALL - the comprehensive ideal is undermined by streaming and its often based on social class/conformity>ability
- some LEA continue with grammar school
- comprehensives in suburban areas achieve better results than innner-city areas = reproducing class inequaluty
what happened in 1979?
shift away from social Democratic emphasis on equal opportunities to New Right emhasis on marketisation, parental choice and selection.
what is marketisation?
the introduction of market forces of consumer choice and competition between suppliers into areas run by the state.
what happened in 1988?
Education Reform Act
which government introduced ERA?
conservative
what 2 important changes to the administration of state education were introduced by the ERA that helped schools market themselves?
1 - open enrolment: parents are allowed to select multiple schools to send their children too, but only specifying one as their ‘first choice’. result of this was that some schools became oversubscribed, and these were allowed to select pupils according to certain criteria.
2 - formula funding: money given to schools based on the number of students they attracted.
who describes marketised education as ‘parentocracy’?
MIRIAM DAVID
what is parentocracy?
rule by parents.
ERA gave power to the parents to shape their educational future by giving them the right to choose which school their children attend
what were some of the ERA measures?
- League tables and Ofsted report publications
- National Curriculum hailed as meritocratic
- testing at 7, 11 and 14
- diversification - give more choice. Existing schools could opt out of LEA control and become directly funded by central gov. ‘grant maintained schools’ managers had freedome over marketing, enrolment and selection
- specialist schools e.g. IT schools widened parental choice
- parents and others can set up free schools