Ethnic Differences in Achievement - Internal Factors (Labelling, Pupil Subculture). Flashcards

1
Q

What are the internal factors causing ethnic differences?

A

1) . Labelling.
2) . Pupil subcultures.
3) . Ethnocentricity and institutional racism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the main sociological approach to internal factors?

A

Interactionists =

  • focus on face-to-face interactions between teachers and pupils.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do labels imposed by teachers result in ethnic differences?

A

Racist labels –> disadvantaging ethnic minorities –> self-fulfilling prophecy = under-achievement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Gillborn and Mirza (2000) find about black pupils’ achievement?

A
  • Primary school = highest achievers on entry.
  • GCSE = 21 points below average.

Suggests the school is to blame, not background.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Gillborn and Youdell (2000) find about teachers racially labelling black pupils?

A
  • Based on racial expectations, they believed black pupils had more discipline problems.
  • Saw their behaviour as threatening.
  • More likely to be punished for the same behaviour.
  • Pupils felt they were being picked on.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What do Gillborn and Youdell conclude about teachers labelling black pupils?

A

Conflict is a result of racist stereotypes of the teacher, not the pupils background.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how can labelling black pupils lead to under-achievement?

A

1) . Higher levels of exclusion of black boys (Bourne).

2) . Black pupils being placed in lower sets/streams.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Wright (1992) find about teachers labelling Asian primary students?

A

Stereotyped them and treated them differently =

  • assumed poor English –> used simplistic language.
  • mispronounced children’s names.
  • saw them as a problem they could ignore.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does teacher’s actions to Asian pupils lower self-esteem and result in under-achievement?

A

They would feel worthless, marginalising them.

  • this will prevent them from achieving, making them inevitably feel worse.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why are pupil subcultures formed?

A

As a result of labelling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What responses do black boys take to labelling, according to Sewell (1998)?

A

1). Conformists =

keen to succeed and accepted the school goals.

2). Innovators =

pro-education, anti-school –> value school, but not teacher approval.

3). Retreatists =

disconnected from school and black subcultures.

4). Rebels =

became the ‘black macho lad’ and despised white boys, and black conformist boys.

  • shows that not all black pupils live up to teachers expectations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Sewell say black people joining subcultures has led to under-achievement?

A

Even though only a minority of black boys fitted the ‘macho’ stereotype =

  • teachers viewed them all like this.
  • discrimination led to under-achievement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

According to Sewell, what is more important in causing underachievement of black boys?

A

External factors –> peer pressure, street culture and the lack of a nurturing father.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to Archer, what are the 3 ways teachers define pupils’ identities?

A

1) . Ideal pupil identity =
- white m/c, masculinised identity.
- achieve through natural ability.
2) . Pathologised pupil identity =
- Asian, feminised identity.
- slogger –> achieve through hard work.
3) . Demonised pupil identity =
- black/white w/c.
- peer led, culturally deprived, under-achiever.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What pupil identity are ethnic minorities likely to be seen as, according to Archer?

A

Pathologised or demonised =

  • this leads to their under-achievement as teachers label them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which 2 sociologists show how ethnic minorities reject negative labels?

A

1) . Fuller (1984) =
- groups of high achieving black girls in year 11.
2) . Mac an Ghaill (1992) =
- study of black and Asian Alevel students.

17
Q

What did Fuller find?

A
  • Group of black girls in year 11 (rejected teacher stereotypes).
  • Determined to achieve, worked hard without looking like they were.
  • Didn’t seek teachers approval (like innovators).
18
Q

What did Mac an Ghaill find?

A
  • Black and Asian Alevel students.
  • Didn’t accept teacher’s negative labels.
  • e.g. girls who attended all girls school = felt it gave them a greater academic commitment to overcome negative labels at college.
19
Q

What did Mirza find about black girls’ strategies for dealing with negative labels?

A

It put them at a disadvantage, even though they didn’t accept the label.

  • e.g. not asking certain staff for help.
20
Q

How does Fuller and Mac an Ghaill’s findings criticise Sewell?

A

Too deterministic =

  • labelling doesn’t inevitably result in a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure, sometimes they refute it.
21
Q

How is the labelling theory criticised?

A

They assume that once labelled, pupils will have a self-fulfilling prophecy.