Ethics Exam Study Guide Flashcards
the important questions of ethics and if it is first order/metaethics
which actions are right and wrong? - 1st order
what makes actions righ tor wrong? - 1st order
is there such a thing as right and wrong? - meta
what is metaethics and 1st order ethics
1st order = at face value
metaethics = asks if questions are even valid
the point of ethical theories
gives a decision procedure, one can do x if x is permitted by the ethical theory, when faced with hard moral decision then consult theory that is true
method for deciding which ethical theory is correct
judge to see if it comes to intuitively correct result in certain moral dilemmas like bystander case
why the issue of how moral judgements are formed is important
they guide behavior so to judge them is praise/blame
challenges we face when forming moral judgements
there may be morally irrelevant factor contaminating, may not know why we make the moral judgement
main contrast of deontolgy and utilitarianism
utilititarianism is only need to know consequences, deontology is only need to know the type of action
general view of utilitarianism
action is right if it leaves the most people best off, cares about consequences of action
how utilitarianism relates to consequentialism
it is a type of consequentialism - which is that an action is right only if it has the best consequences
great happiness principle
right action makes greatest happiness for greatest number, so greatest hedons (measure of pleasure/displeasure), JS Mills, under utilitarianism
how utilitarianism is universalist and impartialist
it takes everyone’s welfare into account equally
general view of deontology and what Kant considered to be forbidden
action is right if doesn’t violate moral laws, some things are wrong no matter what (murder, lying, stealing)
doctrine of double effect
acceptable harm as side effect of causing a good end - but cannot use harm as means for making good end, deontology adopted the concept
bystander case
utilitarianism says flip the switch and deontology says don’t, utilitarianism wins, so deontology made doctrine of double effect
footbridge case
utilitarianism says push, deontology says no push, deontology wins, and utilitarianism says emotion is just getting in the way
medical sacrifice case
harvest organs of one to save another, utilitarianism says do, deontology says don’t, healthy person wouldn’t want it so utilitarianism makes rule utilitarianism where the rule is to not do because then people wouldn’t go to hospitals which is worse
case og outweigh moral law
torture a terrorist, hide a Jew in the attic
moral pluralism
correct ethical theory is made of prima facie duties (fidelity, gratitude), and use moral judgement to tell which one to follow when conflict - in utilitarianism
threshold deontology
when faced with very bad consequences, resort to consequentialism
rule utilitarianism
in some situations, way to maximize good is to have rules that everyone follows