Establishing conformity Flashcards
An experiment in Absolutism, 1629–1640 - Religious issues: Laud and Arminianism in England and Scotland.
What were Laud’s reforms (Establishing conformity) aimed at achieving?
Laud’s reforms aimed to enforce discipline and conformity within the Church, tightening local governance, and reflecting Charles I’s struggles with the Parliaments of the 1620s
How did Charles I view Laud’s policies of establishing conformity?
Charles I supported Laud’s policies as a means to instill order and obedience, aligning with his belief in the divine right of kings and efforts to consolidate royal authority.
What measures were taken to assert conformity in the Church?
- Use of Liturgy: Strict instructions for service format and wording.
- Church Canons: Revised to include Laud’s new altar policy.
- Proclamations: Issued frequently for maintenance and repair of church buildings.
How was conformity audited under Laud’s reforms?
- 1629 Order: Bishops were instructed to reside in their dioceses and oversee parish priests.
- Visitations: Routine inspections ensured compliance with liturgical reforms.
- Presentment Bills: Detailed reports on failings in church buildings, clergy conduct, or parishioner behavior were submitted to the Archdeacon.
What judicial methods were used to enforce conformity?
- Increased use of the Star Chamber and Court of High Commission with harsher punishments.
- The removal of Robert Heath in 1634 to prevent unfavorable rulings on religious uniformity.
What were the social and religious impacts of Laud’s reforms of establishing conformity?
Laud’s reforms alienated Puritans and many gentry, fostering resentment and contributing to polarization between the monarchy, Church, and local communities.
How did Laud’s reforms of estbalihsing conformity contribute to the English Civil War?
They exacerbated the breakdown of trust in Charles I’s rule, intensifying political and religious divisions of the 1640s.
What broader themes were reflected in Laud’s push for conformity?
- Centralisation of power and enforcement of royal authority.
- Alienation of key groups, such as Puritans and gentry, who viewed reforms as authoritarian.
- Use of fear and coercion to enforce conformity.
How did Laud’s enforcement signify both continuity and change?
Continuity:
- The Church as a royal authority instrument was not new.
- Legal and judicial tools like Star Chamber and High Commission were longstanding traditions.
Change:
- Stricter controls on liturgy, church appearance, and clergy behavior.
- Harsher punishments and increased trials for dissent.
- Greater politicization of conformity tied to Charles I’s broader power consolidation.
What were the key causes of Laud’s reforms?
- Laud’s religious convictions for a hierarchical and ceremonial Church.
- Charles I’s belief in divine right and distrust of Parliament.
- Rising Puritan dissent threatening religious uniformity.
What were the effects of Laud’s reforms?
- Increased resentment among Puritans and dissenters.
- Alienation of gentry and local elites.
- Heightened tensions between monarchy and Parliament, leading to the Civil War.
What were the turning points of Laud’s enforcement of conformity?
- Removal of Robert Heath (1634): Ensured legal rulings favored religious uniformity.
- Prosecution of High-Profile Dissenters (1630s): Punishments galvanized opposition.
- Broader Breakdown of Trust: Symbolized Charles’s disregard for liberties and escalated the crisis of authority.
What are the historiographical perspectives on Laud’s reforms?
- Traditional View: Laud and Charles’s inflexibility caused their downfall (S.R. Gardiner).
- Revisionist View: Policies aimed at maintaining order, opposition exaggerated by radicals.
- Modern View: Kevin Sharpe emphasizes reforms as part of Charles’s centralization efforts.
How did Laud’s enforcement deepen political and social divisions?
It widened the religious divide between Laudians and Puritans and the political divide between royalists and opponents, framing resistance as a defense of “ancient liberties.”
What were some counterarguments to criticisms of Laud’s reforms?
- Laud’s measures sought to restore order in a lax Church, not enforce authoritarianism.
- Arminian theology emphasized beauty and order, countering Puritan austerity.
- High-church Anglicans and traditionalists supported the reforms for practical and theological reasons.