Epidemiology/BioStats Flashcards
Prevalence?
of existing cases in population at a specific moment in time.
(Total number of cases in population at one point in time)/(total population)
Incidence?
of new cases in the disease free population that develop over a period of time
(of new cases in the disease free population over a given time period)/(total population at risk during specified time period)
(remember to subtract pre-existing cases of the disease from total population at risk)
Prevalence depends on?
Incidence and duration of disease
P = I X D
Incidence can be measured in a ___ study?
cohort
Prevelance can be measured in a ____ study?
cross-sectional
As the mortality of a disease decreases, prevalence of the disease ______ because ____ increases?
Increases because duration of disease increases.
Sensitivity
Probability that a patient with a disease will have a + test result
sNOUT- will rarely miss people with the disease so it is good at ruling out those who do not have the disease.
Desirable early in diagnostic work up
Specificity
Probability that a patient without the disease will have a negative test result. A specific test will rarely say someone has the disease when they do not so its good at ruling IN.
sPIN - desirable to confirm a diagnosis
The higher the prevalence of a disease, the higher the ____
positive predictive value
positive predictive value
probability that a patient with a (+) test result truly has the disease
negative predictive value
probability that patient with (-) test result truly does not have disease
the lower the prevalence, the higher the?
NPV
Likelihood ratio?
express extent to which a given test result is likely in diseased people vs people without disease
(+) LR shows?
how much the odds of disease are increased if test result is (+)
(-) LR shows?
how much the odds of disease decrease if test result is (-)
Posttest odds?
Pretest odds X LR
Absolute risk?
Incidence of disease
Attributable risk (risk difference)
Difference in risk between exposed/unexposed groups
Incidence of disease in exposed - incidence in unexposed
needed to treat
of individuals that need to be treated for 1 patient to benefit
1/attributable risk
1/(incidence of disease in exposed - incidence in unexposed)
relative risk or risk ratio?
how much more likely an exposed person is to get the disease in comparison to unexposed
(measures strength of association between exposure and disease)
relative risk/risk ratio equation?
incidence in exposed/incidence in unexposed
RR > 1 suggests? RR<1 suggests?
>1 = increased risk <1 = decreased risk
Odds ratio definition and equation
estimates relative risk in case control studies. the lower the disease incidence, the more closely it approximates RR.
odds that diseased person is exposed / odds that non-diseased person is exposed
Kaplan-Meier curve
describes survival in cohort of patients over time
gold standard study to evaluate diagnosis, treatment, etc?
double-blinded randomized control trial
List types of studies in descending order of quality?
RCT, observational study-(used if exposure is therapeutic intervention), case series/case reports.
double - blinded studies prevent _____ bias?
observation
cross-sectional study?
observational study that assesses risk factors and outcomes at snap-shot in time. (measures correlation, not causation)
Prevalence study?
cross sectional study performed to measure prevalence.
cohort study (also known as longitudinal or incidence study)
group of people without outcome of interest (disease) are assembled. For each possible risk factor people are categorized as exposed or unexposed and then they are all followed over time. Incidence of outcome is compared in exposure groups.
(Ex: Framingham heart study)
What study is only way to directly determine incidence of disease?
cohort
2 types of cohort studies?
prospective or retrospective
case-control study
Two groups are identified (case group) and (control group) and then the frequency of a risk factor is compared between them.
case group- heart disease
control- no heart disease
risk- red meat exposure
advantage of case control study?
can be used to study rare diseases as they can use smaller groups than cohort studies
RCT
patients randomly assigned to treatment vs control groups.
ability to demonstrate causal relationships.
Cohort studies can measure?
RR, OR, Incidence, Prevalence
Cross-sectional studies measure?
Prevalence (not incidence) because measurements occur at a specific moment in time.
case control studies measure?
Odds Ratio (approximating relative risk)
What type of bias is particularly problematic in retrospective cohort studies?
selection bias
What types of bias are common in case control studies?
recall bias (since groups with or without disease are selected first and then asked about exposures)
Selection bias
Selection bias
samples/participants selected that may differ from rest of population
ex: individuals concerned about breast cancer due to family history may be more likely to enroll in a study
measurement bias
measure or data gathering diff btwn groups (one group measured with CT, other with MRI)
Confounding bias
3rd variable positively or negatively associated with exposure or outcome (leads to incorrect association)
effect modification
third variable disproportionately affects 2 groups. It shows a meaningful difference (vs confounding which does not)
Ex: new chemo drug shows improved survival for patients undergoing radiation but no effect for patients not undergoing radiation.
lead-time bias
results from earlier detection of disease- gives appearance of prolonged survival
length bias
screening tests detect disproportionate # of slowly progressive disease but miss rapidly progressive ones (leads to overestimation of benefit of the screen)
Type I error:
concluding that there is a difference in treatment when there is not. (false +)
-rejecting null hypothesis when it should not be
Type II error:
concluding no difference in treatment effects when there is a difference. (false negative)
Failing to reject the null hypothesis.
p value
estimate of probability that differences in treatment effects in a study could have happened by chance alone
does p value say anything about direction or size of the effect?
No
Power
probability that a study will find a statistically significant difference when one is truly there
Increasing ____ will increase power of study?
of study subjects
Power equation?
1 - type II error.
Confidence interval
Demonstrates the statistical significance- showing the size of the effect and the statistical power (the narrower the confidence interval- the greater the statistical power)
If the confidence interval contains the (RR or OR of 1.0 or 0%), the results are?
not statistically significant