engaging Flashcards
engaging
process of establishing a mutually trusting and respectful helping relationship
relational foundation of MI
should always be engaging even after the engagement process is over
Goal #1 of engaging
create a working alliance
Goal #2 of engaging
have the client return
* people who are actively engaged are more likely to return and benefit from treatment regardless of the orientation of the provider
sustain talk
when someone is supporting the status quo
doesn’t want to change
the more someone hears change talk, the more likely they are to get on board with it
same is true about sustain talk
traps (7)
assessment trap
expert trap
premature focus trap
confrontation-denial trap
labelling trap
blaming trap
chat trap
assessment trap / Question-answer trap
* how to avoid?
counsellor controls session by asking questions, while the client only responds
effects: teaches client to be passive
avoid by: using a pre-counselling questionnaire to gather information or save questions until after engagement
– use open questions
– no more than 3 questions in a row
expert trap
* how to avoid?
when there is an uneven position between the client and counsellor and the counsellor is expected to provide all the answers
effects: teaches client to be passive
– builds expectations for a counsellor =-prescribed solution
avoid by: exchanging information in an empathetic, collaborative fashion
– better to ask them what they already know and how they think about it compared to just providing info
premature focus trap
assuming you know what the client wants to discuss and focusing before engaging
** getting wrong focus could cause discord
effects: can create a power struggle for the discussion topic
– can create discord
avoid by: starting broad and by focusing on the person’s concerns (rather than your own)
confrontation-denial trap
arguing for change, leaving the client in the opposite role
effects: can increase sustain talk and create discord
avoid by: offering empathy for the client’s situation
labelling trap
the client is given a “diagnosis” that may stigmatize
effects: may provoke denial and hinder progress
– power struggle for control
avoid by: using reflections and reframing
– deemphasizing the label
blaming trap
client feels blamed by others and themselves
effect: may create defensiveness
avoid by: reflecting and reframing the person’s concerns
– render blame irrelevant
chat trap
off-topic chatting that has insufficient direction (small talk)
effects: hinders progress
avoid by: using relevant open questions
– devoting attention to client’s concerns
process of communication
encoding: the speaker is trying to put into words what’s in their head
– can go wrong if someone doesn’t say what they meant
hearing: maybe you hear something not in the way that they meant it
decoding: determine and interpret what you think they meant
** lots of places where the communication process can break down
** reflective listening gets us out of this problem
nonverbal listening
undivided attention
** nodding, eye contact, tone, sitting at same level, mirror their emotions (but not when angry)
– physical distance/seating
– open body language
roadblocks to communication
traps are more about the counsellors interaction and roadblocks are more about responses to what the client is saying
ordering
warning
advising
persuading
criticizing
praising
shaming
analyzing
reassuring
questioning
withdrawing
reflective listening
statements of understanding that are used to check for meaning (rather than relying on assumptions)
requires thinking reflectively
- requires inflection that turns down at the end
is directive
simple - repeats clients own words
more sophisticated - new words, unspoken feelings
reflections
making statements not questions
words may be similar but the delivery and effect are different
creates momentum in the conversation
MI microskills: oars
open questions
affirmations
reflecting
summarizing
ask open questions
goal: to give client the opportunity to express themselves
their answer allows you to follow the clients lead
affirming
providing client with statements of support, appreciation, respect
must be appropriate and sincere - will backfire if it’s fake
can use reframing to recast a weakness as a strength
affirmations
communicate a value of the person
statement of thanks and appreciation
mirror of the client’s personal qualities and strengths
anchor to support self-efficacy
praise
may be perceived by the client as “judging” their behaviour
assumes that people need to be told what is right and wrong
may seem patronizing
may suggest that the relationship is tentative, based on the counsellor’s approval
summarizing
a special form of reflective listening that is used to recap session content and allow client to hear their own words for a 3rd time
be careful using “but”
– cancels out what has been said before
3 types of summarizing
collecting: recalling series of interrelated items as they accumulate
linking: use to contrast or tie together what the person has said - use “and” not “but”
transitional: use to wrap-up or move from one phase of change to another